1
Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Annotated Bibliography
Student’s Name
Institution
2
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Annotated Bibliography
Part 1
Nhamo, G., Dube, K., & Chikodzi, D. (2020). Restaurants and COVID-19: A Focus on
Sustainability and Recovery Pathways. In Counting the Cost of COVID-19 on the
Global Tourism Industry (pp. 205-224). Springer, Cham.
Summary
In this article, Nhamo, Dube, and Chikodzi focus on a study the evaluates the position
of the hospitality industry in the US and the input of that industry to the entire economy of the
US and that of the world. They find out that the hospitality industry is responsible for millions
of jobs. The industry is however vulnerable to such pandemics and disasters as COVID 19.
This pandemic has shaken the entire world but most significantly the food and hospitality
industry. Millions of jobs lost and numerous restaurants closed down. They, therefore, chat
out a way to salvage the industry from the impending danger of collapse. They suggest higher
hygiene measures, grants, loans and interventions, lower interest rates among other measures
to recover from the effects of the pandemic.
Critical Evaluation
After an understanding of the current situation and how the world got there, the authors
discuss and suggest ways out of the financial and business deep that the industry is in. They
explore the extent of the pandemic’s effects and how possible it is to recover the suggest a
route map for the recovery process.
Relevance
While the pandemic may have been harsh to many businesses, the authors chat out a
recovery path that includes higher hygiene measures hence better food safety, the inclusion of
3
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
technology in the new normal with less contact, new tactics, and the rise of higher takeaway
service than dining service among other ways. That makes the article relevant to the topic at
hand as it routes out a way forward for restaurants and the industry in general.
Part 2
Gursoy, D., & Chi, C. G. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on hospitality
industry: a review of the current situations and a research agenda.
Summary
This one is an analysis of the onset of the pandemic and the effects imposed on the
hospitality industry as a result of the measures taken to protect populations from the virus.
Gursov and Chi find out that the decline of the industry is not yet over since the pandemic is
still not completely dealt with. The pandemics keep coming back in waves that return the
measures which directly result in hospitality business closures and slow down. They,
therefore, suggest better research and specific pathways that could enable the industry to
regain without having regular relapses.
Critical Evaluation
In the pursuit of a solution, Gursov and Chi discuss specified and intensified research
that will suggest solutions between now that the pandemic is still on and after it is gone and
going forward. They also focus more on the customers than the business as they discuss
solutions that keep the safety and trust of the customers first.
Relevance
As a solution, they suggest assuring customers of their safety through heightened
measures in restaurant spaces as well as involving them so that they are a part of the forward
4
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
trajectory and pathway. They make customers the center of attention for the way forward for
the industry.
Annelies Goger and Tracy Hadden Loh. (2020, June 17). ‘A band-aid on a gunshot
wound’: How the restaurant industry is responding to COVID-19 relief.
Summary
At the beginning of their research, Annelies Goger and Tracy Hadden Loh advance
the fact that food preparation and service is the second most common occupation in the US
while waiting tables is the eighth. That makes the effect of the pandemic massive on
employment and consequently income. They recommend that restaurants may have to shed
off some of the human resources which they may have already. They then focus on the reliefs
for businesses that enable them to keep their heads up at least.
Critical Evaluation
Millions of jobs were lost in the initial reduction of customers and the eventual
lockdown of the economies. The authors here discover that these effects are not only on
immediate employees but they come with further secondary effects across to other people.
They also evaluate other solutions that could work for the resumption of the industry on a
gradual basis.
Relevance
They fall in line with the aim of the topic of this study as they start by appreciating the
previous position of the industry, the effects it got from the pandemic, and possible ways out
in the future such as mortgage and rent freezes relieves on debts among other collective action.
Collective community and industry action would make the most needed progress for the
industry.
5
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
How restaurants can thrive in the next normal. (2020, May 19). McKinsey &
Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/how-restaurantscan-thrive-in-the-next-normal
Summary
Stacey Haas and other co-authors focus their recovery attention on the new normal.
They appreciate the role of the industry and the impact the pandemic has had on the industry
altogether. They explain that the recovery is already underway but the normal as was known
before may not return. That is what they term as a ‘new normal’. They make an anticipated
timeline for the progress of the recovery but emphasize that the pandemic will continue to
affect the industry in immense ways event after its containment and that will mean that
restaurants and the entire hospitality industry have to brace for the new normal.
Critical Evaluation
First. The impacts of the pandemic included the closure and upon reopening,
restaurants, and hotels had to consider the new way of business. That included having to
combine on and off-premises dining. That, as they find out is something that will take a while
to go away. That will be a part of the new definition of normal. The industry will have to brace
tactically and financially as the timelines may be slow and sluggish.
Relevance
While they offer a length timeline and speculation, they appreciate the fact that the
industry will thrive in the new normal with the incorporation of prevention and protection
measures, social distancing, mixed selling, and other measures of survival.
6
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
References
Gursoy, D., & Chi, C. G. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on hospitality industry: a
review of the current situations and a research agenda.
Nhamo, G., Dube, K., & Chikodzi, D. (2020). Restaurants and COVID-19: A Focus on
Sustainability and Recovery Pathways. In Counting the Cost of COVID-19 on the
Global Tourism Industry (pp. 205-224). Springer, Cham.
How restaurants can thrive in the next normal. (2020, May 19). McKinsey &
Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/how-restaurantscan-thrive-in-the-next-normal
Annelies Goger and Tracy Hadden Loh. (2020, June 17). ‘A band-aid on a gunshot wound’:
How the restaurant industry is responding to COVID-19 relief.
Annotated Bibliography – Part 1 and 2 (20%)
COMM 1007 (College English) – Professor S. Narinesingh
Overview
Objective:
•
Upon completion of this assignment, students will be able to correctly cite, accurately
summarize, and critically assess reliable research sources (primary and/ or secondary
sources) to determine how they might incorporate the sources into their Argumentative
Research Essay
Submission Instruction:
•
•
Part 1 –– see the exact due date on the Course Calendar and on Blackboard
o Upload a Word document of your APA formatted Annotated Bibliography Part 1
to Blackboard
Part 2 –– see the exact due date on the Course Calendar and on Blackboard
o Upload a Word document of your APA formatted Annotated Bibliography Part 2
to Blackboard
Percentage of Final Grade:
•
•
5% - Part 1 (on the first source – must be a research-based secondary source)
15% - Part 2 (on three additional sources – can be research-based secondary sources
and/ or primary sources such as documentaries, first-person point of view essays,
podcast episodes, policies, etc.)
Course Learning Outcome(s) Assessed:
•
•
•
•
Analyze post-secondary sources to distinguish purpose, organization, and logic of an
argument across a variety of platforms.
Demonstrate research skills by locating, evaluating, and organize information from a
variety of sources.
Produce organized, unified, and coherent work using correct grammar, mechanics,
diction, and a standard formatting and documentation style.
Create informative and persuasive texts in which the main points are supported by
appropriate evidence.
1
Purpose
This assignment marks the development of your research process, specifically Steps 6 and 7
(i.e. find and evaluate sources; cite sources) depicted in the following graphic:
Figure 1. The Research Process graphic. Adapted from "Introduction to the Research Process," by K. Louie for
Lumen Learning, Lumen Learning. License: CC BY: Attribution.
Now that you have completed the Up for Debate: The Newsletter assignment, you have
narrowed down your topic and determined your position on the debate. It’s important to start
finding, organizing, and citing reliable research sources that you can use in your Argumentative
Research Essay.
The purpose of our Annotated Bibliography is to alphabetically catalogue, cite, summarize,
and assess 4 current, relevant, and reliable research sources that will help you to defend your
position in your Argumentative Research Essay.
Instructions for Part 1 (5%):
Use the APA Style Guidelines to create an annotated bibliography for 1 source you will use in
your Argumentative Research Essay. This source must be a research-based secondary
source. You may share this source with your Research Team for your Current Conversation
Podcast Episode assignment, which is due in Week 6.
For your source, provide the following information:
1. Full APA reference citation (double spaced with a hanging indent)
2. A concise and accurate formal summary paragraph of the source written completely in
your own words (approximately 200 words in total).
3. A formal paragraph in which you evaluate the reliability of the source. Provide
evidence from the source to support your evaluation.
2
To plan your paragraph, use the following questions to critically evaluate the source’s
reliability:
a. The author’s level of bias
• Is the author’s tone, attitude, and/ or bias detrimental to the value of their
perspective and the quality of their information?
• Does the author incorporate and acknowledge multiple perspectives?
b. The author’s use of language
• Does the author use effective word choice? Does the author use
accessible language or biased language and jargon?
c. The author’s use of rhetorical strategies (logos, pathos, ethos):
• Does the author clearly express their ideas with logical reasoning?
• Does the author support their points with credible and relevant evidence?
• Can you trace the author’s claims to other reputable sources?
• Can you find trusted coverage that corroborates the author’s claims?
• Does the author appeal to your emotions with appropriate storytelling and
description?
4. A formal paragraph in which you explain the relevance and value of the source to
your research and writing process. In other words, how will you use this source to
respond to your essay prompt and defend your position on the debate? Provide
evidence from the source to support your evaluation.
To plan your paragraph, use the following questions to critically assess the
source’s relevance and value to your Argumentative Research Essay:
a. Do you agree and/or disagree with the source, and why?
b. Did the source make new connections or offer you new ways of seeing the
problem?
c. Are you interested in the source’s use of evidence? Is this something you might
want to use/ do in your own essay?
d. Are you interested in the source’s use of rhetorical strategies? Is this something
you might want to use/ do in your own essay?
e. How do the source’s conclusions impact your own research?
f. How do you plan to use this source in your Argumentative Research essay, and
why?
Important Reminder:
You must justify your views in your paragraphs with specific evidence from the
source. For example, if you argue that the source’s use of
language undermines its reliability, be prepared to incorporate specific
quotations from the source to show the inflammatory, biased, or problematic
language. As always, don’t forget to include your APA in-text citations, and
always explain your evidence!
3
Instructions for Part 2:
Use the APA Style Guidelines to create an annotated bibliography for 3 more sources you will
use in your Argumentative Research Essay. These sources can be research-based secondary
sources and/ or primary sources, such as documentaries, first-person point-of-view essays,
podcast episodes, policies, etc. You may use the 2 sources that your Research Team shared
with you for the Current Conversation Podcast Episode assignment if the sources meet your
research needs and help you defend your position in your Argumentative Research Essay.
For each source, provide the following information:
1. Full APA reference citation (double spaced with a hanging indent)
2. A concise and accurate formal summary paragraph of the source written completely in
your own words (approximately 200 words in total).
3. A formal paragraph in which you evaluate the reliability of the source. Provide
evidence from the source to support your evaluation.
To plan your paragraph, use the following questions to critically evaluate the source’s
reliability:
a. The author’s level of bias
• Is the author’s tone, attitude, and/ or bias detrimental to the value of their
perspective and the quality of their information?
• Does the author incorporate and acknowledge multiple perspectives?
b. The author’s use of language
• Does the author use effective word choice? Does the author use
accessible language or biased language and jargon?
c. The author’s use of rhetorical strategies (logos, pathos, ethos):
• Does the author clearly express their ideas with logical reasoning?
• Does the author support their points with credible and relevant evidence?
• Can you trace the author’s claims to other reputable sources?
• Can you find trusted coverage that corroborates the author’s claims?
• Does the author appeal to your emotions with appropriate storytelling and
description?
4. A formal paragraph in which you explain the relevance and value of the source to
your research and writing process. In other words, how will you use this source to
respond to your essay prompt and defend your position on the debate? Provide
evidence from the source to support your evaluation.
To plan your paragraph, use the following questions to critically assess the
source’s relevance and value to your Argumentative Research Essay:
a. Do you agree and/or disagree with the source, and why?
b. Did the source make new connections or offer you new ways of seeing the
problem?
4
c. Are you interested in the source’s use of evidence? Is this something you might
want to use/ do in your own essay?
d. Are you interested in the source’s use of rhetorical strategies? Is this something
you might want to use/ do in your own essay?
e. How do the source’s conclusions impact your own research?
f. How do you plan to use this source in your Argumentative Research essay, and
why?
Important Reminder:
You must justify your views in your paragraphs with specific evidence from the
source. For example, if you argue that the source’s use of
language undermines its reliability, be prepared to incorporate specific
quotations from the source to show the inflammatory, biased, or problematic
language. As always, don’t forget to include your APA in-text citations, and
always explain your evidence!
5
Annotated Bibliography Success Criteria and Rubric:
The following features are the success criteria for this assignment. Please view the rubric, which
details how you will be marked:
Correctly cite all sources in APA Style (full reference and in-text citations when necessary)
Accurately summarize each source
Critically respond to each source with fair, logical, and insightful analysis of textual evidence
Include the use of “I” in the critical response paragraph (use sparingly and appropriately)
Incorporate textual evidence as paraphrases; only quote when necessary in the critical
response paragraph and do not include long/ block quotations (40 words or more)
Communicate in grammatically correct sentences and a formal tone (i.e. no slang or
colloquialism)
6
Annotated Bibliography Rubric (Part 1 – 5% of final grade; Part 2 – 15% of final
grade)1
Summary: 30% of assessment
Superior/ Advanced
(Wow!: 85-100%)
• Summaries clearly, coherently,
10----9.5----9.0----8.5
• Summaries are mostly clear,
coherent, and accurate.
8.4----8.0----7.5----7.0----6.5----6.1
Fair
(Near Target: 41-60%)
• Summaries are somewhat clear,
coherent, and accurate.
Basic
(Not Yet: 20-40%)
INC
• Summaries are not clear,
coherent, and accurate.
Incomplete
and accurately explain the main
message and main supporting
arguments of the texts.
Good
(On Target: 61-84%)
6.0----5.5----5.0----4.5----4.1
4.0----3.5----3.0----2.5----2.0
See
Prof
Fair
(Near Target: 41-60%)
Basic
(Not Yet: 20-40%)
INC
Critical Response: 40% of assessment
Superior/ Advanced
(Wow!: 85-100%)
• Each source is clearly and
critically evaluated for its
reliability, relevance, and value
explained through analysis that
is fair, insightful, and
thorough.
• Based on the clarity of the
answer given, each source will
be used in a meaningful and
purposeful way in the research
project.
1
• Each source is mostly evaluated
for its reliability, relevance, and
value
• Student’s response is logically
explained through analysis that is
mostly fair and thorough.
• Based on the clarity of the
answer given, each source will
be used in a mostly meaningful
and purposeful way in the
research project.
• Each source is somewhat
evaluated for its reliability,
relevance, and value
• Student’s response is somewhat
logically explained. Analysis is
rushed or underdeveloped.
• Based on the clarity of the
answer given, each source will
be used in a somewhat
meaningful and purposeful way
in the research project.
• Each source is not evaluated for
its reliability, relevance, and
value
• Student’s response is not
critically or logically explained;
analysis is missing or illogical.
• Based on the clarity of the
answer given, each source will
not be used in a meaningful and
purposeful way in the research
project.
Incomplete
• Student’s response is logically
Good
(On Target: 61-84%)
The same rubric will be used to assess both Part 1 (5% of final grade) and Part 2 (15% of final grade)
7
10----9.5----9.0----8.5
8.4----8.0----7.5----7.0----6.5----6.1
6.0----5.5----5.0----4.5----4.1
4.0----3.5----3.0----2.5----2.0
See
Prof
Basic
(Not Yet: 20-40%)
INC
Style & Grammar: 20% of assessment
Superior/ Advanced
(Wow!: 85-100%)
• Writing is clear, accurate,
• Language and tone are
audience-appropriate.
• Free of grammar, spelling, and
mechanical errors.
10----9.5----9.0----8.5
• Writing is mostly clear,
Fair
(Near Target: 41-60%)
•
accurate, and concise.
• Language and tone are mostly
•
audience-appropriate.
• Very few grammar, spelling, and
mechanical errors.
8.4----8.0----7.5----7.0----6.5----6.1
•
Writing is somewhat clear,
accurate, and concise.
• Writing is mostly unclear,
Language and tone are
somewhat audienceappropriate.
• Language and tone are not
Some grammar, spelling, and
mechanical errors.
6.0----5.5----5.0----4.5----4.1
inaccurate, and not concise.
audience-appropriate.
• Many grammar, spelling, and
mechanical errors.
4.0----3.5----3.0----2.5----2.0
Incomplete
concise.
Good
(On Target: 61-84%)
See
Prof
APA Referencing: 10% of assessment
10----9.5----9.0----8.5
Good
(On Target: 61-84%)
Fair
(Near Target: 41-60%)
• APA citations are mostly
correct.
• APA formatting is mostly
correct.
• APA citations are somewhat
correct.
• APA formatting is somewhat
correct.
8.4----8.0----7.5----7.0----6.5----6.1
6.0----5.5----5.0----4.5----4.1
Basic
(Not Yet: 20-40%)
• APA citations are mostly
incorrect.
• APA formatting is mostly
incorrect.
4.0----3.5----3.0----2.5----2.0
INC
Incomplete
Superior/ Advanced
(Wow!: 85-100%)
• APA citations are completely
correct.
• APA formatting is completely
correct.
See
Prof
8
Purchase answer to see full
attachment