1200 Word Paper Needed

Oct 7th, 2014
Price: $30 USD

Question description

Below is the paper given to us in class. Basically we had to read an article called “Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets” by Peter Singer. We have to read that and compare it to an article we found on the schools website. Below is the link to that article. Those are the two pieces of literature needed to write the paper. 



Paper Three: Expanding the Conversation

[img alt="page1image1496" width="63" height="1" src="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=c8d7844b84&view=fimg&th=148e7afc05c72488&attid=0.1.1&disp=emb&attbid=ANGjdJ-w1nBntOTmqWXP90jOz3Dyp6HF4wJrCeC9TzGw2qYzJqUAtRYHbEzBAmWlmy0EAtLTLQzskuL6unX8WVeZVnBsxywrDELu2_NQck_Rh63JXaa8rYHTQ4R93Wc&sz=-w1600-h1000&ats=1412653461304&rm=148e7afc05c72488&zw&atsh=1" class="CToWUd">


This paper represents the first step in research. You will be responsible for discovering some article or book chapter or other scholarly source that will help you expand or adjust your initial argument. The key will be to find some source that will give you the opportunity to shift your position in some way, to argue something slightly different than your position in the original paper. Nevertheless, you must still maintain your original sources in the argument: Fukuyama and/or Singer must remain as part of your argument in addition to the new source.

For example, if you argued about the ethics of biotechnology in Paper #1, perhaps you can find another source that also talks about biotechnologies in such a way that offers some new perspective you did not account for in the original paper. Likewise, if you argued about the ethics of privacy in Paper #2, find some source that offers a new perspective on the idea of privacy that in turn allows you to reconsider your position and argument.

You do not need to change your fundamental position, but the shape of your paper should shift to account for new arguments. However, if you read something that makes you completely reconsider your original position so that you want to change it, you can do so—as long as you keep all of the original and the new sources “in the conversation.” If in the original paper you used Fukuyama to support your position, maybe in the revision you will need to show Fukuyama as a contrary position against which you argue, with the support of the new source.

Your new source must be a scholarly, academic article discovered through the library search. Newspaper and Magazine articles are not academic.


Length: 1,200 words
Format: MLA
A Works Cited page is required for this paper.

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
School: University of Maryland

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

Review from our student for this Answer

Oct 26th, 2014
"The best tutor out there!!!!"
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1819 tutors are online

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors