NRS 550 GCU Translational Research Graphic Organizer Discussion

User Generated

Gbhnert2019

Health Medical

NRS 550

Grand Canyon University

NRS

Description

Translational Research Graphic Organizer

Use the "Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template" to compare three types of translational research with traditional (qualitative or quantitative) research. Make sure to include methodology, goals, and data collection in your organizer.

You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Course Code NUR-550 Class Code NUR-550-O502 Criteria Translational Research Graphic Organizer Percentage 100.0% Comparison of Research in Relation to Methodology 25.0% Comparison of Research in Relation to Goals 25.0% Comparison of Research in Relation to Data Collection 25.0% Required Sources 5.0% Presentation 10.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Translational Research Graphic Organizer Unsatisfactory (0.00%) A comparison of research in relation to methodology is not included. A comparison of research in relation to goals is not included. A comparison of research in relation to data collection is not included. Sources are not included. The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Sources are not documented. Total Points 100.0 Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) A comparison of research in relation to methodology is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of research in relation to goals is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of research in relation to data collection is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Number of required sources is only partially met. The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (88.00%) A comparison of research in relation to methodology is present. A comparison of research in relation to goals is present. A comparison of research in relation to data collection is present. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (92.00%) A comparison of research in relation to methodology is clearly provided and well developed. A comparison of research in relation to goals is clearly provided and well developed. A comparison of research in relation to data collection is clearly provided and well developed. Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) A comprehensive comparison of research in relation to methodology is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive comparison of research in relation to goals is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive comparison research in relation to data collection is thoroughly developed with supporting details. Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Comments Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template Observations (Similarities/Differences) Methodology Goals Data Collection © 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Please find attached the final answer and the TURNITIN reportThanks

Translational Research Graphic Organizer
Name
Institution
Date

© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Translational Research Graphic Organizer

Methodology

Goals

Translational
Research Type 1
(T1)

Quantitative
Research

Observations
(Similarities/Differences)

The researcher for
translational research
makes use of
databases to identify
the relationship
between a concept
from traditional
research and human
medicine (Choi,
Tubbs & Oskouian,
2018). The
knowledge from the
link on computer
models and nonhumans

In this case, the
researcher reviews
various research
articles then identify
a gap that is present.
From here, the
researcher develops a
question, which will
be able to address the
gap (Morgan, 2017).
He/she will then
formulate a
hypothesis in
response to the
research question.
The hypothesis can
be tested on human
subjects or at a lab

In both, a review of
research articles and
database search is
conducted. However, in
quantitative research, the
researcher will look for a
gap, while in translational
type 1, he/she will look for
the link in the knowledge
obtained. Besides, a
translational type 1
researcher will test the
knowledge on non-human
and computer models as
opposed to quantitative
research...


Anonymous
Just the thing I needed, saved me a lot of time.

Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags