For this assessment, you will use the three tests you selected for Assessment 1. Locate and summarize a minimum of two articles related to the technical qualities for each selected test.Note: Synthesizing the evaluation of test technical quality requires specific steps that must be carried out in a certain order. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.Introduction Professionals in the field must be able to administer and interpret tests to establish a diagnosis and determine a treatment plan. Before a test is selected, test users must be knowledgeable of the technical quality (reliability and validity) of the tests they use. Test users should only use instruments with adequate reliability and validity.In this assessment, you will complete a deeper analysis of the technical quality of your three selected tests from Assessment 1 by focusing on reliability and validity evidence. To complete this assessment, you will draw upon your knowledge about psychometrics in general and reliability and validity in particular.Preparation Download the Assessment 2 Template: Evaluation of Technical Quality [DOCX] to your computer and use it for the basis of your assessment. The template contains instructions to guide you through each element of the assessment.For this assessment, you will conduct a deeper analysis of the technical quality of the three tests you selected for Assessment 1.Instructions For Assessment 1, you selected three standardized tests from one category that have relevance to your specialization or a related profession. Assessment 1 focused on the purpose, contents and constructs assessed, norms, and required training of psychological tests. For this assessment, you will complete a deeper analysis of the technical quality of your three selected tests by focusing on reliability and validity evidence. To complete this assessment, you will draw upon your knowledge about psychometrics in general and reliability and validity in particular. You are encouraged to use the PSY-FP7610 – Tests and Measurements Library Guide to assist your searchFor each article: List the APA reference for each journal article (a minimum of six). Identify if the article addresses reliability or validity. Discuss if the article addresses sources of error variance, reliability estimates, evidence of validity, or bias and fairness. Identify the specific type of reliability or validity (for example, test-retest reliability, predictive validity, etc.). Identify the overall results of the research, including any psychometric or statistical outcome. Guidelines for Selecting the Literature Use the most current sources you can find. You may cite older sources if they are classics, if you want to show the chronology of something, or if you have another good reason (i.e., the test was published more than 8 years ago) If you choose to use older sources, you will need to explain why. Use current, peer-reviewed journal articles for more current tests. Do not use sources without an author or a publication date. Do not use quotes; use only your own words. Evaluate whether the results support the use of your test as appropriate for your field and populations to be served.Note: The articles you need to complete this assessment should be available as part of the library collection. In future courses, you may use the Capella library's Interlibrary Loan service to obtain articles outside of the collection, but you should not have to use the service for this course. In the event that you cannot find articles covering a newer test edition, please refer to the List of Tests by Type [DOCX]. Note which tests have been designated as acceptable for searching prior test editions.Note: Be sure to use the Assessment 2 Template: Evaluation of Technical Quality [DOCX].Additional Requirements Your assessment should meet the following requirements: Template: Assessment 2 Template: Evaluation of Technical Quality [DOCX] to complete the assessment. References: A minimum of six peer-reviewed journal articles (textbooks, websites, literature reviews, and the MMY book reviews do not count for these references). Three of the articles must discuss reliability and three must discuss validity. Length of paper: A minimum of 6 double-spaced pages of content, not including the title page or references (an abstract is not required). Font and font-size: Times New Roman, 12 point. APA format: Current APA format and style is required throughout. Refer to the Academic Writer for guidance on APA style and format as you prepare all of your assessments for this course. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria: Competency 2: Analyze key psychometric properties related to tests and measurement, with an emphasis on reliability and validity. Review the reliability evidence for three tests and support the analysis by citing at least two peer-reviewed journal articles for each test. Review the validity evidence for three tests and support the analysis by citing at least two peer-reviewed journal articles for each test. Synthesize information from the articles to evaluate the current technical quality of three tests and their status as appropriate quality tools in the field. Competency 7: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological profession. Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations for members of an identified field of study, using APA style and formatting.

Complete part I (the worksheet), Part II, & Part IIIAPAThe sources I reviewed are given bellow but choose the ones that have an abstract and most importantly, the ones required according to the instructions. If they do not meet the requirements, kindly find the suitable ones. ReferencesBellin, J. (2014). The inverse relationship between the constitutionality and effectiveness of New York City stops and frisk. BUL Rev., 94, 1495.Chu, C., Lu, E. Y., Wang, C., & Tsai, T. (2016). Grounding Police Accountability and Performance in Context: A Comparative Study of Stop and Frisk Between New York City and Taipei City. Public Administration & Development, 36(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1755Evans, D. N., Maragh, C. L., & Porter, J. R. (2014). What do we know about NYC’s stop and frisk program? A spatial and statistical analysis. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 1(2), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.12.66Howell, K. B. (2015). Gang policing: The post stop-and-frisk justification for profile-based policing. U. Denv. Crim. L. Rev., 5, 1.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147158https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.12.66Miller, T. R., Lawrence, B. A., Carlson, N. N., Hendrie, D., Randall, S., Rockett, I. R., & Spicer, R. S. (2017). Perils of police action: a cautionary tale from US data sets. Injury prevention, 23(1), 27-32.Milner, A. N., George, B. J., & Allison, D. B. (2016). Black and Hispanic Men Perceived to Be Large Are at Increased Risk for Police Frisk, Search, and Force. PloS one, 11(1), e0147158. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147158Nebeker, C., Harlow, J., Espinoza Giacinto, R., Orozco-Linares, R., Bloss, C. S., & Weibel, N. (2017). Ethical and regulatory challenges of research using pervasive sensing and other emerging technologies: IRB perspectives. AJOB empirical bioethics, 8(4), 266-276.Ponte Carvalho, G., & Duarte, E. P. (2018). Police frisk/search and the Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case: institutional violence and Constitutional courts' role in assuring the right to counsel during the police investigation. Rev. Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 4, 303.