This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically analyze a case. Organizing the data in this way will help you apply the four principles of principlism.Based on the "Case Study: Healing and Autonomy" and other required topic study materials, you will complete the "Applying the Four Principles: Case Study" document that includes the following:Part 1: Chart This chart will formalize principlism and the four-boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.Part 2: EvaluationThis part includes questions, to be answered in a total of 500 words, that describe how principalism would be applied according to the Christian worldview.Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.3 APA reference.

Week 5: Risk Evaluation and Patient Safety (Links to an external site.)PurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to (a) provide examples of a potential risk concern in your organization, (b) apply basic principles of risk management and risk reporting to a healthcare risk management concern, (c) demonstrate an understanding of risk management tools by correctly choosing and using them in specific cases, (d) recognize the extent of problems in patient safety in medical care, and (e) explore the contributing factors for this adverse medical outcome.Course OutcomesThrough this assessment, the student will demonstrate the ability to do the following.Analyze the effects of regulation, legislation, and accreditation on healthcare quality improvement. (CO 2)Use critical inquiry to evaluate the design, implementation, and outcomes of quality and safety improvement strategies. (CO 3)Advance knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for the continuous improvement of quality and safety in healthcare. (CO 5)Assignment Criteria for the Paper1. Identify a potential risk within a healthcare organization and provide the rationale for choosing this issue.2. Discuss the risk management elements and patient safety strategies in this issue.3. Complete a literature review related to this issue.4. Discuss the risk assessment measures related to internal and external environmental factors, and mechanism.5. Discuss use of human factors, engineering, and other factors to improve patient safety.6. Use a risk theory and apply it to the patient safety issue.7. Integrate two QSEN competencies within your plan to mitigate this risk-related issue.8. The body of the scholarly paper is to be 3–5 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages.9. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, references, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing and APA format as expressed in the current edition.10. Include a minimum of four references published within the past 5 years, not including your textbook. References may include scholarly websites of organizations or government agencies and must be presented using APA current edition format for electronic media.Preparing the Paper CategoryPoints%DescriptionIntroduction2010%Identify a risk-related issue and provide a rationale.Patient safety strategies 3010%Discuss patient safety strategies related to this event.Literature review3015%Complete a literature review.Contributing factors3015%Discuss contributing factors, environmental risk assessment/internal and external factors.Risk theories3015%Use one of the risk theories to illustrate the failure in the patient safety program.QSEN3015%Discuss two QSEN competencies used to mitigate a risk-related issue.Conclusion205%Provide summary and concluding statements.APA style105%Text, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA current edition format.Scholarly references105%Paper is 3–5 pages in length, excluding the cover and reference pages. References include a minimum of 4 scholarly references, excluding the course text.Grammar and spelling105%Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.

Module 4 - CaseHEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACQUISITION AND IMPLEMENTATIONCase AssignmentAs the Health IT Director at Trident Hospital (400-bed inpatient facility), you are responsible for all health information technology upgrades and maintenance. Trident Hospital has recently decided to purchase a new electronic health record (EHR) system. Trident Hospital’s Chief Information Officer (CIO) has requested that you provide a detailed report of what to expect from the point of acquisition through implementation.This report should be between 7 – 10 pages (excluding title page and reference page) and outline the following:Which EHR product you are recommending and why Discuss any features that you feel are important, such as clinical decision support systems (CDSS), computerized provider order entry (CPOE), patient portal, etc.Acquisition (what are the steps and what to expect)Implementation (what are the steps and what to expect)Standards (what types of standards should be implemented)Policies (what are some of the important policies that should be implemented?)In addition, you need to discuss the benefits of this particular EHR and any potential barriers. Keep in mind that this should be a technical paper that discusses the aforementioned areas.Assignment ExpectationsProvide a 7- to 10-page technical paper (excluding title and reference pages) that discusses the particular EHR you have selected; acquisition; implementation; standards; and policies. You also need to discuss the benefits and barriers of the EHR implementation.Provide an introduction and conclusion paragraph.Your references and citations should be consistent with a particular formatting style such as APA.Provide references from at least 3 scholarly articles (peer-reviewed). Do not include information from non-scholarly materials such as wikis, encyclopedias, or www.freearticles.com (or similar websites). Use the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals: http://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php.For additional information on reliability of sources, review the following source:Georgetown University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating internet resources. Retrieved from https://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/research-guides/evaluating-internet-contentYour response should incorporate the outcomes of the module with the requirements of this assignment and will be graded according to the rubric.Module 4 - BackgroundHEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACQUISITION AND IMPLEMENTATIONRequired ReadingCresswell, K. M., Bates, D. W., & Sheikh, A. (2013). Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 20(e1), e9–e13. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001684Karimia, F. (2015). Clinical information systems end user satisfaction: The expectations and needs congruencies effects. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 53:342–354. Retrieved from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046414002731R, A. R., O, S., M, F., & A, S.-G. M. (2019). Electronic Health Record implementation: A review of resources and tools. Cureus, 11(9). Retrieved from https://www.cureus.com/articles/21899-electronic-health-record-implementation-a-review-of-resources-and-toolsAyatollahi, H. (2016). Confirmation of expectations and satisfaction with hospital information systems: A nursing perspective. Health Information Research, 22(4) 326–332. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116545/VIDEO: Health Information Management at Houston Healthcare. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCAmNh-PgFQ