PADM 611 American Public University Wk 3 District of Columbia v Heller Discussion

User Generated

serqybhpn

Law

PADM 611

American Public University System

PADM

Description

Assignment Instructions

Your assignment is to listen to the oral argument of the attorneys before the court for District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008) then write a one page double-spaced opinion paper on your impression. Did the attorneys argue their point well? Did one do better than the other? Were they able to get their statement out without being interrupted? Which Justice was dominant? Was it clear from what direction they were asking - conservative? liberal? Did they seem to take sides? Next you are to read the short brief from oyez to see exactly what the holding was for the case and which Justices were in the majority or dissent. Was this how you thought they would rule? Finally, look at the background to see what implications this case might have after you finish your paper.

The oral argument and brief for District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008) can be found at https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/07-290

The background and details can be found at http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/dc-v-heller/.

Remember, I am looking for your impressions of the workings of the Court, not your opinion on the holding! You should only use the sources given for this assignment. The only source on the submission should be the oral argument for the case itself.

Please see the rubric below:

Criteria

Description

Points

Synthesis of Knowledge:

Paper cohesively links legal concepts and learning objectives to the case. Student demonstrates critical understanding of the legal concepts and its relation to the workings of the Court.

0-20

Application of Knowledge:

Student establishes connections to the arguments by the attorneys and the political leanings of the Justices. Student addresses the interactions between the Justices and the attorneys and the impact on their arguments. The paper ends with a prediction on how the case will be decided prior to reading the decision.

0-45

Writing and Research Skill:

Student effectively communicates policy concepts and ideas. Paper follows APA formatting and style guidelines. Paper is grammatically correct, free of spelling errors and has an introduction, logical body, and summary.

0-35

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached. Please let me know if you have any questions or need revisions.

Running Head: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER

District of Columbia v. Heller
Professor's name
Name of student
Course title
Date

1

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER

2

District of Columbia v. Heller began as a suit filed in the US District Court in
Washington in 2003. The suit had been filed by six residents of the federal District of Columbia
as Parker v. District of Columbia. The residents wanted the court to revoke the enforcement of
three provisions of the district's Firearms Control Regula...


Anonymous
I was struggling with this subject, and this helped me a ton!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags