Individual Role and the Literary Artist in Societal Criticism PPT

User Generated

snvfnygubznvev

Humanities

Description

You should be using these 4 Texts below to write the presentation, and use the rubric attached for more guidance

  • From the Worms of the Earth
  • Shakespeare's Sister
  • On Seeing England
  • The Prologue (Chaucer)

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Unit 1 - Grade 12 - Reflecting on society; argument, satire and reform Summative 2 Task & Rubric (Presentation) Task Description: Individually, deliver a presentation to the class discussing the following question: What factors lead people to criticize their society rather than simply accept it? Due: Sunday 25th October 2020, 1pm. Presentations will take place during Sunday 25th (P7), Monday 26th (P1), Wednesday 28th (P8) and Thursday 28th October 2020 (P5). You will have 3-4 minutes to present your findings. GRASPS GOAL ● The goal is to deliver a presentation on factors that lead people to criticize society. ROLE Adapted from http://www.readwritethink.org/files/resources/printouts/30700_rubric.pdf ● Your job is to analyze and discuss the different motivations, reasons and rationales on why people criticize society than simply accept it. AUDIENCE ● The target audience is a panel of social commentators. SITUATION ● The context you find yourself in is you have been asked to share your views to a panel of social commentators. PRODUCT, PERFORMANCE AND PURPOSE ● You will create a presentation to be delivered to the rest of the class in order to communicate your views. STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS ● Your performance needs to be based on delivery, content/organization, enthusiasm and audience awareness. Further Guidance ● Develop your thoughts into a thesis statement ● Provide examples of two historical figures who may exemplify your thesis statement ● Refer to at least two of this unit’s texts, as found on Savvas Realize, to support your point of view ● Provide citations/references/bibliography Adapted from http://www.readwritethink.org/files/resources/printouts/30700_rubric.pdf Oral Presentation Rubric 0—1 2—3 4—5 • Holds no eye contact with audience, as entire assignment is read from notes/presentation • Displays minimal eye contact with audience, while reading mostly from the notes/presentation • Consistent use of direct eye contact with audience, but still returns to notes/presentation • Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes/presentation • Speaks in low volume and/ or monotonous tone, which causes audience to disengage • Is uncomfortable whilst speaking with uneven volume and little or no inflection • Is at ease whilst speaking with satisfactory variation of volume and inflection • Is fully comfortable whilst speaking with fluctuation in volume and inflection to maintain audience interest and emphasize key points • Mic is not turned on during the entire presentation • Mic is not turned on intermittently during the presentation • Mic is mostly turned on during the presentation • Mic remains turned on during the entire presentation • Mic does not project voice during the entire presentation • Mic does not project voice clearly (perhaps echoes a lot or has background sound) intermittently during the presentation • Mic mostly projects voice clearly (perhaps some echo or background sound) during the presentation • Mic projects voice clearly (without any disruption) during the presentation • Camera is not turned on or does not work intermittently during the presentation • Camera is mostly turned on or works during the presentation • Camera remains turned on or works during the entire presentation Delivery • Camera is not turned on, or does not work during the entire presentation Adapted from http://www.readwritethink.org/files/resources/printouts/30700_rubric.pdf 6— 7 Content/ Organization • Little to no attempt made to fulfill purpose of question, conveying a simplistic response • Attempts to fulfill purpose of question, conveying an unclear perspective • Partially fulfills purpose of question, mostly conveying a clear perspective • Fully fulfills purpose of question, conveying a clear and distinct perspective • Provides irrelevant evidence/example from one of this unit’s texts, as found on Savvas Realize, or no evidence/example at all • Provides weak/irrelevant evidence/examples from two of this unit’s texts, as found on Savvas Realize • Provides semi-pertinent evidence/examples from two of this unit’s texts, as found on Savvas Realize • Provides entirely pertinent evidence/examples from two of this unit’s texts, as found on Savvas Realize • Supports thesis statement/ideas with weak/irrelevant evidence/examples from two other referenced sources • Supports thesis statement/ideas with semi-relevant evidence/examples from two other referenced sources • Supports thesis statement/ideas with entirely relevant evidence/examples from two other referenced sources • Some citations/references/ bibliography provided • Incomplete citations/references/ bibliography provided • Complete citations/references/ bibliography provided • Uses an approved referencing (MLA, APA) style inaccurately • Uses an approved (MLA, APA) referencing style mostly accurately • Uses an approved (MLA, APA) referencing style entirely accurately • Shows no interest in topic presented • Shows little or mixed feelings about the topic being presented • Shows some enthusiastic feelings about topic • Demonstrates strong enthusiasm about topic during entire presentation • Fails to increase audience understanding of knowledge of topic • Raises audience understanding and knowledge of some points • Raises audience understanding and awareness of most points • Significantly increases audience understanding and knowledge of topic; convinces an audience to recognize the validity and importance of the subject • No variation of visual aids; font size and colour are ineffective in enhancing overall efficacy of the presentation • Little variation of visual aids; font size and colour are chosen randomly that do not enhance overall efficacy of the presentation • Some use of visual aids; font size and colour are chosen with some thought to enhance overall efficacy of the presentation • Entirely original use of visual aids; font size and colour are chosen carefully to enhance overall efficacy of the presentation • No facial expressions and paralinguistic cues are used to complement the presentation • Facial expressions and paralinguistic cues maybe used but are irrelevant or inappropriate • Facial expressions and paralinguistic cues are used partially during the presentation • Facial expressions and paralinguistic cues are used effectively during the presentation that complement the presentation fully • Does not support thesis statement/ideas with evidence/examples from two other referenced sources • Little to no citations/references/ bibliography provided • Uses any approved (MLA, APA) referencing style wrongly Enthusiasm/ Audience Awareness Adapted from http://www.readwritethink.org/files/resources/printouts/30700_rubric.pdf
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

okayal send the answer just wait and write the review
Attached. Please let me know if you have any questions or need revisions.

THE LITERARY ARTIST AS A CRITIC

Name of the student
Name of the professor
Course title
Date

INTRODUCTION
“ Literature is the mirror for the society” (Duhan 2015).
Through literature, the artist is able to influence his society by assuming the higher
role of the critic.
In order for the literary artist to influence his or her society, he should be able to stand
“out ” and look at the society from a higher ground.
The following presentation will labor on answering the question, “ Why is the literary
artist a critic in the society?”
WELCOME!

Plato in his writings opines that, the literary artist dwells on the world of
forms which he relates to the familiar objects which surrounds him
(Palmer, pp. 447-452). His opinion was , that the literary artist depends on
a world of forms and sits on a higher position and tries to influence the
real world. In this opinion, the literary artist stands outside the society and
tries to understand the same society. It is this approach perhaps that makes
the literary artist to criticize the society. In “on seeing England”, the writer
takes the audience through a journey that uses sarcasm and metaphorical
language to express her pessimism towards England.
The nation is compared to “a jail” or “a leg of mutton”. This cannot be
possible if the literary artist does not assume the role of the societal
mirror(Garcia 2015).

Similarly the artist as a teacher.
In “ The Prologue ”the writer introduces us to a group of people on pilgrimage
journey.
This is achieved by the two tales that each pilgrim should tell to the party while the
host joins and acts as the judge. Through this, a clear picture of all levels of English
life are drawn.
At the end the author succeeds in teaching about in teaching about social
...


Anonymous
Excellent! Definitely coming back for more study materials.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags