Course Code
NRS-433V
Class Code
NRS-433V-O507
Criteria
Content
Percentage
75.0%
Quantitative Studies
5.0%
Background of Study
10.0%
Article Support of Nursing Practice
15.0%
Method of Study
15.0%
Results of Study
15.0%
Anticipated Outcomes and Outcomes
Comparison
15.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
5.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles
presented use quantitative research.
Background of study, including problem, significance to
nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is
incomplete.
Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is
incomplete.
Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted.
The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete.
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications
for nursing practice, is incomplete.
Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are omitted or are
unrealistic. Comparison of research article outcomes to
anticipated outcomes is incomplete.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
190.0
2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)
Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only
one article is based on quantitative research.
Background of study, including problem, significance to
nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is
included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is
presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to
answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information
and detail is required.
A partial summary of the method of study for each article is
presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete.
A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or
incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.
A summary of the study results includes findings and
implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and
explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies.
Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are partially summarized.
Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated
outcomes contains omissions of key information. It is unclear
how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the
current research mentioned compare.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, or word choice are present.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
3: Satisfactory (83.00%)
N/A
Background of study, including problem, significance to
nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is
partially complete and includes some relevant details and
explanation.
A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT
question is presented. The articles demonstrate general
support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is
unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the
articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question.
Some rational or information is needed.
A general discussion on the method of study for each article
is presented. The comparison of study methods is
summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are
summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions.
More information is needed.
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications
for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the
discussion includes some relevant details and explanation.
Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are summarized.
Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated
outcomes is generally presented. More information is needed
to fully establish how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT
and those of the current research mentioned compare.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some
minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
4: Good (94.00%)
N/A
Background of study, including problem, significance to
nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is
complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is
presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the
proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison
groups in the articles compare to those identified in the
PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity
or support.
A discussion on the method of study for each article is
presented. The comparison of study methods is generally
described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are
presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is
required for accuracy or clarity.
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications
for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details
and explanation.
Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are discussed. A
comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated
outcomes of the PICOT is presented. An explanation of how
the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the
current research mentioned compare is presented. Some
detail is needed for clarity.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in
formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
: Excellent (100.00%)
Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on
quantitative research.
Background of study, including problem, significance to
nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is
thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive
explanation.
A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question
is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in
answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions
and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to
those identified in the PICOT question.
A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article
is presented. The comparison of study methods is described
in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are
presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid
understanding of research methods.
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications
for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant
details and extensive explanation.
Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are thoroughly
discussed. A detailed comparison of research article
outcomes to the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT is
presented. An explanation of how the anticipated outcomes
of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned
compare is presented in detail.
Comments
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned
Research Critique Guidelines – Part II
Use this document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that
you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your
responses.
Quantitative Studies
Background
1. Summary of studies. Include problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and
research question.
How do these two articles support the nurse practice issue you chose?
1. Discuss how these two articles will be used to answer your PICOT question.
2. Describe how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those
identified in your PICOT question.
Method of Study:
1. State the methods of the two articles you are comparing and describe how they are
different.
2. Consider the methods you identified in your chosen articles and state one benefit and one
limitation of each method.
Results of Study
1. Summarize the key findings of each study in one or two comprehensive paragraphs.
2. What are the implications of the two studies you chose in nursing practice?
Outcomes Comparison
1. What are the anticipated outcomes for your PICOT question?
2. How do the outcomes of your chosen articles compare to your anticipated outcomes?
© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Literature Evaluation Table
Student Name:
Summary of Clinical Issue (200-250 words):
America has seen an increase in the number of aged persons over recent years attributed to the large sizeable baby boomer
cohort. The complexity of the needs of the aged persons is one of the main challenge health practitioners’ faces. However, one of the
issues nurses working with older people face is acknowledging cognitive changes in the aged. Most nurses fail to acknowledge when
attribute subtle observed cognitive changes to underlying neurodegenerative conditions compared to normal developmental changes.
However, various factors such as lifestyle and maintenance, among others influence the aged-associated cognitive changes. Moreover,
nurses also struggle to contemplate the functional capacity of the aged in the physical and social environment. This is because most
aged persons maintain a high level of functioning suggesting that the factors attributed to health, lifestyle, and the comparison between
functional capabilities and environmental requires more powerfully determine performance. However, the diversity and complexity of
needs among aged persons have also made it difficult for nurses to contemplate comprehensively patients psychopathology. Therefore,
most nurses struggle to understand the psychopathology within the aged persons when providing care. Understanding patients’
psychopathology is fundamental to respond effectively to customers, especially those that often experience multiple physical and
psychosocial problems.
PICOT Question: Does understanding patients’ psychopathology improve caregiving among the aged persons after, especially during
the initial months after being admitted.
Criteria
APA-Formatted
Article Citation with
Permalink
Article 1
Hamdan, A. (2016).
Article 2
Article 3
Kane, R. A. (2010). Psychosocial
Heffernan, E., Coulson, N. S., &
Psychosocial and
issues. Psychological and
Henshaw, H. (2016).
sociodemographic
social issues for older
Understanding the
© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
predictors of depression
people with cancer.
psychosocial experiences
among older persons in
Cancer, 68(11), 2514-
of adults with mild-
Jordan. Open Journal of
2518.
moderate hearing loss:
Nursing, 532.
An application of
Leventhal’s selfregulatory model.
International Journal of
Audiology, 1-11.
How Does the Article
Relate to the PICOT
Question?
Quantitative,
Qualitative (How do
you know?)
Purpose Statement
Research Question
The article seeks to investigate
the physiological issues that need
to be considered when
performing a clinical intervention
with aged persons.
The article is a qualitative
research as the investigations and
opinions provided are based on
non-numeric data.
To investigate the physiological
issues that need to be considered
when performing a clinical
intervention with aged persons.
The article investigates various
psychological and social issues
for aged persons with cancer.
The article explored psychosocial
experiences among adults with
hearing loss.
The article is a qualitative
research as the investigations and
opinions provided are based on
non-numeric.
To investigate various
psychological and social issues
for aged persons with cancer.
Identify a frame of reference for
engaging in clinical work with
older adults.
NA
The article is a quantitative
research as the investigations and
opinions are based on an analysis
of numeric data.
To explore the psychosocial
experiences of adults with
hearing loss using the selfregulatory model as a theoretical
framework.
NA
2
Outcome
NA
Most older persons do not want
to enter a nursing home.
Physicians believe that a nursing
home is a sensible, practical
option.
Setting
(Where did the study
take place?)
University of Rochester School
of Medicine, Rochester, New
York.
Institute of Medicine of the
National Academy of Science,
Washington, DC.
Sample
NA
NA
Method
The research uses an
investigative approach based on
previous research.
The research used the hypothesis
approach by investigating
previous work.
Key Findings of the
Study
Psychologists strive to
understand the functional
capacity of older adults.
Psychologists strive to be
knowledgeable about the
psychopathology of the older
Social issues for older people
with cancer include multiple
losses, the reactions of
others, arranging for their own
care and meeting responsibilities
for others.
3
The individuals with hearing loss
reported a small number of
positive consequences of hearing
loss, such as being able to ignore
unpleasant sounds and
disturbances.
A small number of individuals
with hearing loss hoped that a
cure could yet be developed.
National Institute of Health
Research, UK.
Twenty-five adults with hearing
loss from the UK participated in
the study.
The research uses a sampling and
recruitment method to collect
data. Twenty-five persons with
hearing loss participate in the
study. A pilot study was also
conducted with two adults with
hearing impairment and two
audiologists. Thematic analysis
was used to analyze the data.
People with hearing loss have
activity limitations to various
activities such as conversing with
others and watching television.
population.
Recommendations of
the Researcher
Criteria
APA-Formatted
Article Citation with
Permalink
The identified aspects t should be
taken into consideration when
performing clinical interventions
with older adults.
The availability of a wide range
of therapeutic possibilities is
crucial in care facilities.
The paper recommends the need
for a comprehensive,
multidimensional assessment that
considers psychological wellbeing, social well-being, the
social environment, and the wellbeing of family members who
give care to the patient.
The study recommends social
isolation to patients with hearing
loss to avoid embarrassment,
fatigue, and stress in social
situations.
Article 4
Article 5
Article 6
Proctor, E. K., Hasche, L., &
Zebrack, B., & Butler, M.
Poon, L. W., Martin, P., &
Morrow, N. (2008).
(2012). The context for
Perceptions about
understanding
competing for
psychosocial outcomes
psychosocial problems
and behavior among
and treatment priorities
adolescents and young
among older adults with
adults with cancer.
depression. Psychiatric
Journal of the National
Services, 9(6), 670-675.
Comprehensive Cancer
Bishop, A. (2010).
Understanding
centenarians’
psychosocial dynamics
and their contributions to
health and quality of life.
Current Gerontology and
Geriatrics Research, 20.
4
Network, 10(9), 11511156.
How Does the Article
Relate to the PICOT
Question?
Quantitative,
Qualitative (How do
you know?)
Purpose Statement
Research Question
Outcome
The article highlights recent data
to illustrate how psychological
domains affect the health and
quality of life among aged
persons’.
The article is a quantitative
research as the investigations and
opinions are based on an analysis
of numeric data.
To showcase how the four
pertinent psychosocial domains
affect the health and quality of
life of the old, and supplement
recommendations of the 2001
NIA Panel on Longevity for
future research.
NA
Depression co-occurred with
health problems and functional
impairment.
The paper showcases how
depression should be considered
as a treatment priority among
older persons’.
The article is a qualitative
research as the investigations and
opinions provided are based on
non-numeric data.
To explore dispersion as a
treatment priority among a group
of older persons with comorbid
conditions.
What are effective caregiving
strategies during mental health
care?
What are the problems clinicians
face during mental health care?
40% of the participants reported
emotional problems, such as
grief, loneliness, worries,
boredom, or memory problems.
5
The paper investigates how
clinicians can achieve costeffective quality care by
understanding the psychological
and social factors for patients.
The article is a quantitative
research as the investigations and
opinions are based on an analysis
of numeric data.
To provides a context for
understanding the
experiences of adolescents and
adults with cancer, and highlight
the key domains of
Psychosocial needs in this
population.
NA
87% of adolescent patients
with cancer, 92% of patients in
their 20s, and 92%
of patients in their 30s expressed
need for information about
cancer and its treatment within
the first four
months of diagnosis.
Setting
(Where did the study
take place?)
Sample
University of Georgia, USA.
Urban and rural regions of
Midwestern state.
Comprises characteristics of 49
NA
community long-term care
clients with a history of
depression who were interviewed
to discuss competing priorities to
the treatment of depression.
Michigan
Age at Diagnosis
14–19 y 103 (47.9)
20–29 y 48 (22.3)
30–39 y 64 (29.8)
Gender
Male 114 (53)
Female 101 (47)
Race
White/Caucasian 95 (44.6)
Hispanic/Latino 91 (42.7)
African American 11 (5.1)
Asian American 13 (6.1)
American Indian 3 (1.4)
Employment/School Status
Employed/in school 127 (61.1)
Not employed/in school 81
(39.0)
Relationship Status
Married/partnered 81 (38.4)
Not married/partnered 130 (61.6)
Type of Cancer
Hodgkin disease 23 (10.7)
Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma 17
(7.9)
Melanoma 1 (0.5)
Testicular 14 (6.5)
Thyroid carcinoma 1 (0.5)
Female genital 8 (3.7)
6
Method
Key Findings of the
Study
Recommendations of
the Researcher
The study investigated 109
individuals who were asked to
participate in recruitment letters.
A diagnostic interview was also
carried out.
Data on participants' perceptions
of depression and depression's
relationship to other problems
were analyzed with NVivo
qualitative data analysis
software.
Patients with mild depression
were significantly more likely to
identify family problems as
having higher priority.
There is a need to establish nonspecialty settings such as that
Soft tissue sarcoma 21 (9.8)
Brain 14 (6.5)
Leukemia 50 (23.4)
Other carcinomas 19 (8.9)
Breast 19 (8.9)
Bone tumors 26 (12.1)
All other 1 (0.5)
Treatment Status
Currently undergoing treatment
198 (92.1)
Not in treatment 17 (7.9)
The article used questionnaires to The article used a hypothesis
interview the participants.
approach in its investigation.
Financial, family, and health care
problems were also common
problems attributed to various
psychological issues.
Health care providers should
elicit older adults' perspectives
7
Communicating information to
the target population can be
challenging because levels of
cognitive and emotional
development are varied, labile,
and maturing.
Effective communication with
the target population requires
cultural competence.
The need for information,
practical support, and
studied here may be wellpositioned to engage older adults
in depression treatment.
on depression and approach
depression care within a social
context, linked to other medical
and social services.
8
Counseling support is important
during the continuum of care.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment