Individual Theory , communications homework help

User Generated

ebal69

Business Finance

Description

Micro level theories

write 5-6 pages research about Argumentation Theory  

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running Head: ARGUMENTATION THEORY

Argumentation Theory
Name
Instructor
Institutional Affiliation
Date

1

ARGUMENTATION THEORY
ARGUMENTATION THEORY
This is a learning that constitutes many fields on how deductions can be arrived at
through rational thinking; founded on claims, fitfully or not. It comprises the arts and sciences of
civic discussion, conversation, negotiation and inducement. This theory tries to expound more on
the laws of extrapolation, logic and bureaucratic laws focusing on both the artificial and real
universe scenery.
This theory comprises of discussions and conciliations aimed at arriving at a mutually
acceptable deductions between the parties involved. It further embraces dialogues which
primarily focuses on disputing another argument, the subdivision of communal discussions
whose core objective is the opponent to emerge as the winner. It’s by this art that people guard
their beliefs, self-interests in logical discussions, with joint phraseology and during the course of
negotiation (Van Eemeren et al, 2013).
Argumentation can be applied in law, for instance during trials, in preparing the defense to be
presented in the court law during a case hearing, testing the legitimacy of the certain varieties of
evidence presented. It further, helps the scholars in learning of post hoc rationalizations whereby
the managerial participants try to substantiate resolutions made unreasonably.
This theory can be understood further by exploring its core components which comprises
of: having a clear understanding and recognizing the arguments which can be either overt or
inferred and the objectives of those individuals involved in various kinds of dialogues,
recognizing grounds which build the basis of the deductions arrived at, launching the weight
proof which tasks individuals to come up with

the proof for the claims presented, this

constituent focuses on shaping the person who made the initial claim and bring him/her to task of
providing the proof that will show why the positions held should merit the acceptance of the

ARGUMENTATION THEORY
opponent, this can only be achieved when the individual tasked to provide the proof to present
arguments which are valid, persuasive, lack of any feebleness and which cannot be easily
criticized (Van Eemeren et al, 2013). Further, one should try to recognize reasoning in the
challenger’s arguments in order to criticize the basis of the argument in order to provide counter
arguments.
...


Anonymous
Very useful material for studying!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags