TASK:part A. 1 Read this one-page information sheet about forensic facial reconstruction. (links on the left to learn more) http://www.anthropology.si.edu/writteninbone/facia... (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. 2 Browse this list of websites that feature Neanderthal facial reconstructions by reputable and knowledgeable experts. (5 points) 3 http://peabody.yale.edu/exhibits/fossil-fragments/... (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. 4 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-1996... (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2008/09/17... (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. 5 http://www.daynes.com/en/reconstructions/neanderth... (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. http://arc-team-open-research.blogspot.com/2012/08... (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. 6 Visit the following website and write a brief report on research that strikes you as interesting - it must be about Neanderthals. http://www.pnas.org/search?submit=yes&y=0&fulltext=Neanderthal&x=0&format=standard&hits=80&sortspec=relevance&submit=Go (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site.7 Your post should be a minimum of 100+ words - please cite any resources used. PART B.Discuss the evidence that archaic Homo sapiens built temporary shelters and used fire.(150+ words ; cite the resources used)

Assignment DetailsAnimal TestingHumans use animals for all sorts of things, like food, of course, and companionship. They harvest all sorts of animal products from wool and leather to glue and even heart valves. Animals are used for many different services: guard dogs, therapy animals, truffle-hunting pigs, polo ponies, and so on. In 1933, more than a dozen women went blind after using Lash Lure mascara (National Academy Press, 2004). The compounds in this product literally burned their eyes and resulted in blindness and even death in one case. This led to the use of animals for safety testing of cosmetics. Today, animal testing for safety and efficacy of drugs, sweeteners, food additives, and medical treatments is commonplace. These uses are controversial, however, not only because the animals may suffer during the process and are often euthanized at the end of a test, but because even closely related mammals do not respond to drugs or toxins the same way humans do much of the time. Mice models are often used for safety testing, but they may not be the best choice.This video may help you decide: Should We Trust Studies On Mice?Use this article to help shape your opinion on animal testing: 14 Pros and Cons of Animal ResearchNow choose ONE of the following topics:Volkswagen exhaust testing on monkeysTesting the safety of cosmeticsAlzheimer’s treatments tested in animalsAnswer the following four questions as they relate to your chosen topic:Explain the rationale and main benefit of the testing process you chose.Debate whether this use of animals is necessary or worthwhile.Is there an alternative to this testing?Is there some animal that it is okay to test on—insects, worms, fish, mice, and so on? Where do you draw the line?Use at least 1 credible source to support the arguments presented in your post.ReferencesAyres, C. (2019). 14 pros and cons of animal research. Retrieved from: https://vittana.org/14-pros-and-cons-of-animal-res...Engbretson, M. (2014). Seventy years is enough: It’s time to put the Draize Test out of its misery. Huffington Post. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/monica-engebretson/...Ewing, J. (2018). 10 Monkeys and a Beetle: Inside VW’s Campaign for ‘Clean Diesel’. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/world/europe/vo...Kane, C. (2017). The most promising research in Alzheimer’s disease is conducted with animal models. Retrieved from https://fbresearch.org/promising-research-alzheime...Seeker. (2014, December 1). Should we trust studies on mice? [Video file]. Retrieved from In your own words, post a response to the Discussion Board, and comment on at least 2 other postings. You will be graded on both level of engagement and the quality of the contribution to the discussion.Discussion Board Reminders: Must have three posts: A Main Post and two replies to peers.First post: Either your main post or a reply to others must be posted before midnight CT (Central time) on Friday of each week.Second and third post: Must be posted on a different day from the first post.Connect to Content: At least one post must refer to course learning materials. See the Academic Resource on Discussion Boards for help with connecting to the content.Engaging in Class Discussions: For more information on making the most of your class dialog, review the Academic Resource on Discussion Boards. Grading RubricAssignment CriteriaProficient DescriptorPointsQuality of Main Post27 Points TotalStudent’s main post meets or exceeds the following requirementsResponds completely to all of parts of discussion question. (7 points)Communicates content information accurately and/or logically (7 points)Delivers a thoughtful response demonstrating insights and reflections (7 points)Connects to both key content concepts and personal experiences (6 points)/27 pts.Response to Peers24 Points Total• Responds to a minimum of 2 peers. (12 points per response)Substantive response (6 points)Furthers the conversation with peers. Examples could include: (6 points) Provides additional resourcesConnects to key conceptsShares personal or professional experiencesContributes new information or perspectivePresents a competing viewpoint/24 pts.Support from Learning Resources4 Points TotalAt least one post refers to course learning resources./4 pts.Professional Writing5 Points TotalResponse is well-organized, clear and free of grammatical and mechanical errors.Posts demonstrate courtesy and respect for others./5 pts.Total/60 pts.