Description
Discuss the concept of “value” as it relates to social, environmental, and economic inputs. How is value perceived differently from different stakeholders? When looking at sustainability why is “value” important? What types of metrics help to quantify “value” for stakeholders? Can organizational learning play a role in improving “value”?
220 word and two APA style references
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
Goes above and beyond expectations!
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
PM670 Colorado Technical University Management Methodologies Project Response
Deliverable Length:400 - 600 words APA FormatAssignment Objectives:Demonstrate the significance of the Waterfall, Agile, ...
PM670 Colorado Technical University Management Methodologies Project Response
Deliverable Length:400 - 600 words APA FormatAssignment Objectives:Demonstrate the significance of the Waterfall, Agile, Scrum, and Kanban approaches to project management.Differentiate between Waterfall, Agile, Scrum, and Kanban, in terms of processes and application.Assignment Details:Write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.Research the traditional waterfall method and the Agile methods, including scrum and Kanban. Describe the functions or characteristics for each method. Discuss the difference between waterfall and Agile methods. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the waterfall and Agile methods.
12 pages
Zynga.edited
Social gaming is increasing in popularity with such big names as Zynga. Zynga Inc. is a company that develops the social g ...
Zynga.edited
Social gaming is increasing in popularity with such big names as Zynga. Zynga Inc. is a company that develops the social games played by over 300 ...
4 pages
Diversity And Multiculturalism In Education.edited 1
Mr. Jilka, in this case, needs to look into the matter of Juanita by applying various tactics; develop an understanding of ...
Diversity And Multiculturalism In Education.edited 1
Mr. Jilka, in this case, needs to look into the matter of Juanita by applying various tactics; develop an understanding of Juanita's behavior through ...
5 pages
Gun Control Annotated Bibliography
DeGrazia, D., & Hunt, L. H. (2016). Debating Gun Control: How Much Regulation Do We This article by DeGrazia and Hunt is c ...
Gun Control Annotated Bibliography
DeGrazia, D., & Hunt, L. H. (2016). Debating Gun Control: How Much Regulation Do We This article by DeGrazia and Hunt is credible and reliable, as the ...
University of the Cumberlands Risk Management Discussion
I have three sets of problems related to the risk management. The first and the third questions does not have a paper limi ...
University of the Cumberlands Risk Management Discussion
I have three sets of problems related to the risk management. The first and the third questions does not have a paper limit as long as it has all the answers to the given question. The ssecond question requires 3 pages worth of explanantion with three refrences.
He decides to use the IRR method first. He wants to see which project is better according to the IRRs. Which project is the best using IRR?
Evaluating Mutually Exclusive Projects with Capital Budgeting Techniques (Case Study) Halil D. Kaya Abstract This case dea ...
He decides to use the IRR method first. He wants to see which project is better according to the IRRs. Which project is the best using IRR?
Evaluating Mutually Exclusive Projects with Capital Budgeting Techniques (Case Study) Halil D. Kaya Abstract This case deals with the capital budgeting techniques of Net Present Value (i.e. NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (i.e. IRR). In this case, students will compare two mutually exclusive projects using NPV and IRR, and choose the best project. They will learn about NPV and IRR methods and their advantages and disadvantages. Students will also learn the weakness of the IRR method when comparing two or more projects. Finally, they will evaluate the two projects assuming that the projects are independent projects rather than mutually exclusive ones. This is a hands-on experience for students who want to delve into project valuation. IntroductionAfter graduating from an MBA Program on the East Coast, Michael Strahan had started workingfor a mining company. His company is evaluating two projects: One of them requires a smallerinvestment, and then will create a big, positive cash flow in the first year; and then smaller cashflows after that. The second project is a relatively bigger project. It will require a larger cashflow at the beginning, and then will bring in a relatively small cash flow in the first year. But,this second project will create much larger cash flows in the years after that.Michael has been given the task of evaluating these two projects and choosing the best one forhis company. Initially he thought that this would be an easy task for him. He would just try toaccurately predict the cash flows from the two projects and then evaluate them using some of the“capital budgeting techniques” that he had learned when he was at school.He visits Elizabeth, one of his colleagues, in order to clarify some issues that come to his mind.“Liz” he said, “I am tasked with evaluating two projects and then choosing the best one for ourcompany. I am really excited because it seems like this decision will have a big impact on ourcompany’s bottom line. Could you help me a little bit?”Elizabeth has been working for the company for more than five years. She sure wants to help hiscolleague. She says “Sure, I can help you. Exactly what do you want to learn?”Michael sighs “Elizabeth, when evaluating these two projects, I think I need to use some of thecapital budgeting techniques that we had learned at school. For example, we had Net PresentValue, Internal Rate of Return, Payback Period, and others. I am not sure which of these methodsto use”.Elizabeth responds “I read somewhere that NPV and IRR are the most commonly used methodsto evaluate a project. The Payback Period has lots of disadvantages, so you shouldn’t use thatone for sure”.Michael responds “I don’t know what the advantages and the disadvantages of each of thesemethods. I guess, first, I need to get more information about them. But, if I remember correctly,the Payback Period ignores the time value of money, so it is not good”.Elizabeth says “And it also ignores the cash flows that come after the payback period. In otherwords, if there is a very big positive cash flow that is expected to come sometime in the future,the Payback method ignores that. So, it is kind of weak. There are also other weaknesses withthat method.”She adds “IRR also has some weaknesses. I don’t remember them, but you need to research. Youdon’t want to do something wrong here.”Michael responds “I have read on the web that IRR has two main weaknesses. So, I guess I needto learn about those weaknesses”.“Thanks Liz for offering help. I am now starting to work on it. I think I will see you a few timesin the coming days!”Elizabeth responds “No problem. I am here for help, 24/7”. NPV and IRRMichael’s boss told him that these are “mutually exclusive projects” (meaning that the companywill accept only one of them). Michael thought that going over some of his class notes mayrefresh his memory. After scrambling through his notes, he noticed that he skipped the lecturewhere the professor explained capital budgeting techniques. “No problem” he thought. “I cansearch the web to find some information on these so called “mutually exclusive projects”.Michael has found some explanations for NPV and IRR on the internet. Michael finds a straightforward explanation of Net Present Value: “The difference between the present value of the future cash flows from an investment and the amount of investment. Present value of the expected cash flows is computed by discounting them at the required rate of return”.The same source explains IRR as follows: commonly used as an NPV alternative. Calculations of IRR rely on the same formula as NPV does, except with slight adjustments. IRR calculations assume a neutral NPV (a value of zero) and one instead solves for the discount rate. The discount rate of an investment when NPV is zero is the investment’s IRR, essentially representing the projected rate of growth for that investment. Because IRR is necessarily annual it allows for the simplified comparison of a wide variety of types and lengths of investments.The DecisionMichael has requested some help in estimating theThe expected cash flows for the two are:Yr.Project 1Project 20 - $20 million-$30 million (Initial cash outlay for each project)1 + $12 million+$5 million2 + $8 million+15 million3 + $5 million+20 millionHe knows that for similar projects, his company has a required return of 12%, and a cost of capital of 10% so he decides to use the 12% required rate of return in his calculations.To impress his boss, he wants to do a detailed analysis. He wants to answer all of the followingquestions:1. He decides to use the IRR method first. He wants to see which project is better accordingto the IRRs. Which project is the best using IRR?2. Is IRR an acceptable method to compare two mutually exclusive projects?3. Is NPV an acceptable method when comparing two mutually exclusive projects?4. Later, he visits one of his colleagues and talks about his findings. His colleaguerecommends him to check the NPVs also. He says “O.K. Why not? Confirming my findings with the other method would be nice”. What does he find? Do NPVs confirm his earlier findings?5. Are both methods (i.e. NPV and IRR) good in these situations? What would you do?According to your opinion, which project is better for this company?6. Does IRR always choose the same project whether a firm has a high cost of capital or alow cost of capital?7. How about NPV? Does NPV always choose the same project whether a firm has a highcost of capital or a low cost of capital?8. Over what range of discount rates should we choose Project A? Project B?9. If they were independent projects rather than mutually exclusive projects, what would wedo?
Similar Content
UMUC Cutting Losses and Abandoning Efforts Project Management Discussion
discussion 1One of the most difficult decisions for any leader is to decide when to “cut losses” and abandon an effort...
Beverage Service Operations Assignment Details - Week 5 Individual Project 1, management homework help
Deliverable length: Marketing proposal (600–800 words)Course Objective(s):Create a Proposal for Beverage Marketing/Promo...
FSM 4160 St Francis Preparatory Marketing Strategies of McDonald Case Study
https://hbsp.harvard.edu/coursepacks/790098I will send the username later...
Discussion question
Please read carefully.
You are the marketing director for an NFL team and need to prepare marketing strategies for upcomin...
**Task 3 Strategic Business Marketing
https://online.stratford.edu/mod/assign/view.php?i...username: mqaiymah6046password: MS078653mSTRATEGYThe Company is RJ Re...
PCC Tourism Experience Madame Tussauds Tour Presentation
The purpose of this assignment is:
To give students experience in the tourism, hospitality, and recreation field.
To provi...
Consumer Protection Questions
Read the article and provide a definition of media bias. The answer should be paraphrased in your own words and include an...
Management Question Three Issues
The three issues that had drastic changes by percentage between 2016 and 2021 are; inability to attract and retain a quali...
Lease Obligations
a. Wesjet apply Canadian GAAP or Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. b. IAS 17 is the specific lease standard ...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
PM670 Colorado Technical University Management Methodologies Project Response
Deliverable Length:400 - 600 words APA FormatAssignment Objectives:Demonstrate the significance of the Waterfall, Agile, ...
PM670 Colorado Technical University Management Methodologies Project Response
Deliverable Length:400 - 600 words APA FormatAssignment Objectives:Demonstrate the significance of the Waterfall, Agile, Scrum, and Kanban approaches to project management.Differentiate between Waterfall, Agile, Scrum, and Kanban, in terms of processes and application.Assignment Details:Write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.Research the traditional waterfall method and the Agile methods, including scrum and Kanban. Describe the functions or characteristics for each method. Discuss the difference between waterfall and Agile methods. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the waterfall and Agile methods.
12 pages
Zynga.edited
Social gaming is increasing in popularity with such big names as Zynga. Zynga Inc. is a company that develops the social g ...
Zynga.edited
Social gaming is increasing in popularity with such big names as Zynga. Zynga Inc. is a company that develops the social games played by over 300 ...
4 pages
Diversity And Multiculturalism In Education.edited 1
Mr. Jilka, in this case, needs to look into the matter of Juanita by applying various tactics; develop an understanding of ...
Diversity And Multiculturalism In Education.edited 1
Mr. Jilka, in this case, needs to look into the matter of Juanita by applying various tactics; develop an understanding of Juanita's behavior through ...
5 pages
Gun Control Annotated Bibliography
DeGrazia, D., & Hunt, L. H. (2016). Debating Gun Control: How Much Regulation Do We This article by DeGrazia and Hunt is c ...
Gun Control Annotated Bibliography
DeGrazia, D., & Hunt, L. H. (2016). Debating Gun Control: How Much Regulation Do We This article by DeGrazia and Hunt is credible and reliable, as the ...
University of the Cumberlands Risk Management Discussion
I have three sets of problems related to the risk management. The first and the third questions does not have a paper limi ...
University of the Cumberlands Risk Management Discussion
I have three sets of problems related to the risk management. The first and the third questions does not have a paper limit as long as it has all the answers to the given question. The ssecond question requires 3 pages worth of explanantion with three refrences.
He decides to use the IRR method first. He wants to see which project is better according to the IRRs. Which project is the best using IRR?
Evaluating Mutually Exclusive Projects with Capital Budgeting Techniques (Case Study) Halil D. Kaya Abstract This case dea ...
He decides to use the IRR method first. He wants to see which project is better according to the IRRs. Which project is the best using IRR?
Evaluating Mutually Exclusive Projects with Capital Budgeting Techniques (Case Study) Halil D. Kaya Abstract This case deals with the capital budgeting techniques of Net Present Value (i.e. NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (i.e. IRR). In this case, students will compare two mutually exclusive projects using NPV and IRR, and choose the best project. They will learn about NPV and IRR methods and their advantages and disadvantages. Students will also learn the weakness of the IRR method when comparing two or more projects. Finally, they will evaluate the two projects assuming that the projects are independent projects rather than mutually exclusive ones. This is a hands-on experience for students who want to delve into project valuation. IntroductionAfter graduating from an MBA Program on the East Coast, Michael Strahan had started workingfor a mining company. His company is evaluating two projects: One of them requires a smallerinvestment, and then will create a big, positive cash flow in the first year; and then smaller cashflows after that. The second project is a relatively bigger project. It will require a larger cashflow at the beginning, and then will bring in a relatively small cash flow in the first year. But,this second project will create much larger cash flows in the years after that.Michael has been given the task of evaluating these two projects and choosing the best one forhis company. Initially he thought that this would be an easy task for him. He would just try toaccurately predict the cash flows from the two projects and then evaluate them using some of the“capital budgeting techniques” that he had learned when he was at school.He visits Elizabeth, one of his colleagues, in order to clarify some issues that come to his mind.“Liz” he said, “I am tasked with evaluating two projects and then choosing the best one for ourcompany. I am really excited because it seems like this decision will have a big impact on ourcompany’s bottom line. Could you help me a little bit?”Elizabeth has been working for the company for more than five years. She sure wants to help hiscolleague. She says “Sure, I can help you. Exactly what do you want to learn?”Michael sighs “Elizabeth, when evaluating these two projects, I think I need to use some of thecapital budgeting techniques that we had learned at school. For example, we had Net PresentValue, Internal Rate of Return, Payback Period, and others. I am not sure which of these methodsto use”.Elizabeth responds “I read somewhere that NPV and IRR are the most commonly used methodsto evaluate a project. The Payback Period has lots of disadvantages, so you shouldn’t use thatone for sure”.Michael responds “I don’t know what the advantages and the disadvantages of each of thesemethods. I guess, first, I need to get more information about them. But, if I remember correctly,the Payback Period ignores the time value of money, so it is not good”.Elizabeth says “And it also ignores the cash flows that come after the payback period. In otherwords, if there is a very big positive cash flow that is expected to come sometime in the future,the Payback method ignores that. So, it is kind of weak. There are also other weaknesses withthat method.”She adds “IRR also has some weaknesses. I don’t remember them, but you need to research. Youdon’t want to do something wrong here.”Michael responds “I have read on the web that IRR has two main weaknesses. So, I guess I needto learn about those weaknesses”.“Thanks Liz for offering help. I am now starting to work on it. I think I will see you a few timesin the coming days!”Elizabeth responds “No problem. I am here for help, 24/7”. NPV and IRRMichael’s boss told him that these are “mutually exclusive projects” (meaning that the companywill accept only one of them). Michael thought that going over some of his class notes mayrefresh his memory. After scrambling through his notes, he noticed that he skipped the lecturewhere the professor explained capital budgeting techniques. “No problem” he thought. “I cansearch the web to find some information on these so called “mutually exclusive projects”.Michael has found some explanations for NPV and IRR on the internet. Michael finds a straightforward explanation of Net Present Value: “The difference between the present value of the future cash flows from an investment and the amount of investment. Present value of the expected cash flows is computed by discounting them at the required rate of return”.The same source explains IRR as follows: commonly used as an NPV alternative. Calculations of IRR rely on the same formula as NPV does, except with slight adjustments. IRR calculations assume a neutral NPV (a value of zero) and one instead solves for the discount rate. The discount rate of an investment when NPV is zero is the investment’s IRR, essentially representing the projected rate of growth for that investment. Because IRR is necessarily annual it allows for the simplified comparison of a wide variety of types and lengths of investments.The DecisionMichael has requested some help in estimating theThe expected cash flows for the two are:Yr.Project 1Project 20 - $20 million-$30 million (Initial cash outlay for each project)1 + $12 million+$5 million2 + $8 million+15 million3 + $5 million+20 millionHe knows that for similar projects, his company has a required return of 12%, and a cost of capital of 10% so he decides to use the 12% required rate of return in his calculations.To impress his boss, he wants to do a detailed analysis. He wants to answer all of the followingquestions:1. He decides to use the IRR method first. He wants to see which project is better accordingto the IRRs. Which project is the best using IRR?2. Is IRR an acceptable method to compare two mutually exclusive projects?3. Is NPV an acceptable method when comparing two mutually exclusive projects?4. Later, he visits one of his colleagues and talks about his findings. His colleaguerecommends him to check the NPVs also. He says “O.K. Why not? Confirming my findings with the other method would be nice”. What does he find? Do NPVs confirm his earlier findings?5. Are both methods (i.e. NPV and IRR) good in these situations? What would you do?According to your opinion, which project is better for this company?6. Does IRR always choose the same project whether a firm has a high cost of capital or alow cost of capital?7. How about NPV? Does NPV always choose the same project whether a firm has a highcost of capital or a low cost of capital?8. Over what range of discount rates should we choose Project A? Project B?9. If they were independent projects rather than mutually exclusive projects, what would wedo?
Earn money selling
your Study Documents