MGT 20131 SNHU Decisison Making Process Microbrewery Case Study

User Generated

QbexfgreTeY2b9

Business Finance

MGT 20131

Southern New Hampshire University

MGT

Description

I really need help!, im not getting it..

please and thank you!

New Hampshire Microbrewery’s owner, Eli Hopps, is facing a dilemma and has put the decision making in your hands. He wants you to create a presentation for the stakeholder groups of NHM that outlines both the final decision and how you came to that as the best option.

  • All of the stakeholders think they intuitively understand what’s best for the company. However, you know you need to process the information—both their beliefs and data about the options—more objectively by using a good decision-making framework. Select a decision-making strategy or model and use it as a framework to guide your thought process in approaching the decision. You may use the provided framework or one of your own from the list of strategies.
    • Identify the model.
    • Gather the information.
    • Apply the model to make the best decision.
  • Now that you have your decision, it’s time to think about convincing the stakeholders by making your process transparent. Create a presentation for your decision. A template is provided for you, or you may use one of your own choice.
    • Think about how you will use the information in the slides to communicate your message. Remember all stakeholders will be in the same room, so some people may react positively and others negatively to the same piece of information.
    • Consider how the speaker notes can help you reinforce or support your message or clarify key points.
  • Regardless of people’s individual desires, they always accept decisions firmly rooted in the organization’s goals; thus, explain how your decision furthers NHM’s organizational goals.
    • Specify which goals it upholds.
    • Note any goals it may seem to undercut, and explain your thinking.
  • Because some stakeholders may be slightly disgruntled by the decision you make, it’s important to clearly outline the decision-making process you engaged in to find the optimal choice.
    • Explain why you chose the particular decision-making model you used.
    • Walk through each stage of the process and how you came to each smaller conclusion.
  • Part of a convincing stakeholders is showing them that you have heard their concerns and that you take them seriously. By initially gathering data, you have already done a piece of that. The last piece is to be transparent about the potential impact of the decision for your audience.
    • Specify which stakeholders may be impacted negatively, and speak to what could be done, if anything, to mitigate those consequences.
  • Justify how this decision supports and continues to position NHM as an ethical company.
    • Specify which stakeholders may be impacted negatively, and speak to what could be done, if anything, to mitigate those consequences.

What to Submit

Every project has a deliverable or deliverables, which are the files that must be submitted before your project can be assessed. For this project, you must submit the following:

Presentation to New Hampshire Microbrewery Stakeholders
This presentation should be 7 to 15 slides in length and should clarify the input you gathered, describe the decision-making process you followed, and present the final decision in a persuasive manner.

The template will provide you with the structure to complete this task without focusing on the format of the presentation. Use of this template is optional, and modifications (e.g., color, addition of slides) are welcome.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Bottling Equipment Clarifying the Decision-Making Process Options and Risks Positive Impacts (Potential) Negative Impacts Decision-Making Process Alignment With Organizational Goals Adherence to Organizational Ethics Questions or Concerns? Bottling Equipment Clarifying the Decision-Making Process Options and Risks Positive Impacts (Potential) Negative Impacts Decision-Making Process Alignment With Organizational Goals Adherence to Organizational Ethics Questions or Concerns? Organizational Information Bottling Production Equipment The top-of-the-line equipment is exactly what you’d expect: It’s costly, puts out a large capacity, requires little maintenance (i.e., low maintenance costs), and requires the most people (nine bottling employees and two assistant maintenance workers) to operate. Because it requires the most people, you would have to double your team and provide extensive training to all team members. Also, though the maintenance costs are low, the initial cost is expensive. That said, its output is the largest of all options, and thus could help grow the company the most. But it is also arguably risky because of the high initial cost, both in machinery and hiring of new people, and the “up-skilling” of employees will take time. The middle-of-the-road equipment is just that: medium cost, and medium capacity output. It requires notable human capital, so you would have to hire a few extra hands (requires seven bottling employees). Additionally, some training would be required for all employees, but it wouldn’t be extensive. The maintenance cost, however, is fairly high. Though this is the least risky, its long-term impact on cost and its inherent limits on growth are a concern. The low-end equipment is fairly inexpensive, but also has the least output. Additionally, it requires fewer employees to operate, and thus there may be layoffs (requires two bottling employees and no assistant maintenance workers). The maintenance cost is moderate. There are concerns in regard to your team capacity: Layoffs would likely be on your team, and there is no assurance NHM could find a position for them elsewhere. Also, this equipment offers the least opportunity for growth because it has the lowest output. The refurbished machine is the least expensive option, with medium capacity. You wouldn’t need to hire new employees, but would need to provide some training to the ones you have. Additionally, the maintenance cost is extremely high because it is an old machine, though it has some new parts; refurbished machines break down frequently, so in addition to its high cost, the capacity may be affected by time spent offline. Stakeholders’ Roles and Perspectives The board of directors helps fund the brewery. They are excited about what this major investment means for the future of the company! That said, they are focused mainly on high capacity; they are optimistic and foresee a revenue spike if capacity is increased. Secondly, the cost is a concern; their optimism is tempered by the realities of the budget and their ability to fundraise. You, the brewmaster, are most concerned with your team, of course! The human capital needed for each is important not only for the budget (more people = more paychecks) but also for managing larger teams. Thus, the lower human-capital machines are your preference. It would be difficult to expand quickly, both in hiring and training new employees and in regard to budgeting for this influx. That said, you would like to see a higher-capacity machine because more product is good for the company in order to keep up growth, but it’s less of a concern than your worry about straining the team. The owner is a bottom-line pragmatist: His main concern is the cost. Because some of this cost is reflected in maintenance, this is his secondary concern, but only in its relation to the overall cost. Additionally, there is a potential cost in hiring additional team members, so human capital is an interest of his as well. The maintenance manager, who is a great employee given his extensive history in brewing at this exact plant before NHM purchased it, is a critical component of the success of the company. His main concern is maintenance, since this is something he single-handedly handles. He knows his team and what they can handle; when the work takes too long, production stops, and the company loses money. That said, he’s also clear that the more human capital that’s needed, the more people there are to potentially disrupt the machinery. Thus he would prefer a machine that has lower human capital. Organizational Goals     Increase state-wide market share from 7% to 10% within two years Be known in the community as family-values oriented Earn third-party recognition for “green” practices, including energy and waste reduction Diversify product offerings with the creation of at least one new product by the end of the fiscal year Team Capacity Information: Brewmaster’s Team Brewmaster ($60,000 per year)  Creates beer recipes  Orders ingredients for beer recipes  Cleans and manages equipment  Conducts quality assurance checks (beer tasting)  Manages brewing staff  Manages vendor relationships Assistant brewmaster ($35,000 per year)  Assists brewmaster with brewing process  Cleans and manages equipment  Conducts quality assurance checks (beer tasting)  Ensures appropriate inventory levels Five bottling employees ($28,000 per year)  Ensure safety standards on bottling equipment  Monitor production process  Assemble final six-packs Shipping manager ($45,000 per year)  Packs goods to be shipped  Uses forklift to fulfill orders  Manages vendor relationships  Manages shipping schedule Maintenance manager ($50,000 per year)  Performs regularly scheduled maintenance on all equipment  Manages vendor relationships Maintenance assistant ($30,000 per year)  Maintains maintenance logs  Assists maintenance manager
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached. Please let me know if you have any questions or need revisions.

Bottling Equipment
Clarifying the Decision-Making Process

Options and Risks
❖ Option 1: Top-of-the-line equipment
❖ Option 2: Middle-of-the-road equipment
❖ Option 3: Low-end equipment
❖ Option 4: Refurbished machine

Positive Impacts
❖ Option 1: High Output, low maintenance cost, high growth prospects
❖ Option 2: Medium Output, medium growth prospects, medium maintenance cost
❖ Option 3: Low initial cost, liminal training, low staff requirement
❖ Option 4: Low staff requirement, low maintenance cost

(Potential) Negative Impacts
❖ Option 1: High initial capital outlay, staff require training, and it requires more staff to operate.
❖ Option 2: medium capital outlay, requires some staff training, additional staff will be required.
❖ Option 3: High maintenance cost, low growth prospects, and staff layoff will be required.
❖ Option 4: Low output, low growth prospects, high maintenance cost, and disruption of service expected.

Decision-Making Process
❖ Initial cost of the equipment
❖ Maintenance Costs
❖ Staff requirements
❖ Level of training required
❖ Growth prospects of the option chosen
❖ Company goals and objectives

Alignment With Organizational Goals
❖ High capacity targeted
❖ Budgetary constraints considered
❖ Quality production by following green practices
❖ Family oriented
❖ Growth prospects through creation of new products

Adherence to Organizational Ethics
❖ The company has a family orientation and laying off workers may not be a probable option for the
company.
❖ This will affect t...


Anonymous
Great content here. Definitely a returning customer.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags