General instructions:Responses must be double-spaced, use 12-point font (preferably Times New Roman), and have 1-inch margins. APA in-text citations should be used (no reference page needed unless you add a resource outside of those provided in the module)Word count is a MINIMUM of 750 words. Include the word count at the end of your submission. Only portions of the response that are substantively related to the question will count towards the minimum word requirement. Avoid a lengthy introduction/rephrasing the question (this is not a term paper – get to the point) or the use of rhetorical questions to pad your response.You MUST answer all the questions in the prompt.Submit the Word document (.doc or .docx format) through Canvas. It will be scanned using TurnItIn (plagiarism detection software).Do not self-plagiarize! If you have written on the same subject in the past, it is unfair to your peers for you to use the same responses you have used in the past. Self-plagiarism will result in a zero (0) on the assignment.Although the majority of these are asking for your opinion, you will be expected to support your opinion with your readings, lecture notes, and evidence. These are designed to be critical thinking activities, not regurgitation of class material. This aspect of the course counts for a significant portion of your grade and you should treat these as serious writing assignments. Grading will be based on the student’s ability to 1) identify and explain the issue(s); 2) evaluate empirical evidence and conclusions; and 3) support one’s opinion. A rubric for the reflective writing assignments is available on Canvas.Prompt #3 - Mental HealthThe first two readings focus on police responding to mental health crises. The PERF article and video focus on preventing suicide by law enforcement. For this module's prompt, I want you to consider a scenario that is a combination of both (similar to the experience of Chief McGurry in the film).Put yourself in the role of a law enforcement officer who is concerned about another officer's mental health, specifically concerning suicide. How would you respond with a knowledge of the PERF recommendations and CIT training if:1) You and the officer are the same rank and are on the same shift/team?2) You are a supervisor and the officer is a patrol officer under your command?3) You are a patrol officer and the officer is your shift commander?Apply real world examples from the Saved From Suicide film or personal experience (if you want - remember I am a mandatory reporter). Your answers do not have to be by the book - I want you to consider the nuances of these relationships and potential consequences honestly. RubricReflection Assignment RubricReflection Assignment RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies and Explains Issues3 ptsOutstandingClearly identifies main issues and explains successfully why/how they are problems.2 ptsSatisfactoryClearly identifies main issues but does not explain why/how they are problems.1 ptsUnsatisfactoryFails to identify main issues accurately or clearly.0 ptsIncomplete3 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecognizes Contexts and Stakeholders3 ptsOutstandingAccurately identifies all empirical and theoretical contexts relevant to main stakeholders.2 ptsSatisfactoryShows general understanding of influences of empirical and theoretical contexts on stakeholders, but does not articulate the impact of all specific contexts on stakeholders.1 ptsUnsatisfactoryFails to accurately identify any empirical or theoretical contexts for the problem; presents problems as having no connection to other conditions or contexts.0 ptsIncomplete3 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresents Personal and Other Perspectives3 ptsOutstandingNot only formulates a clear and precise personal point of view but also acknowledges objections and rival positions and provides convincing replies to these.2 ptsSatisfactoryFormulates a clear personal point of view and acknowledges at least some weaknesses of this point of view.1 ptsUnsatisfactoryFails to clearly express own point of view or fails to consider any objection to own point of view.0 ptsIncomplete3 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluates Evidence and Conclusions3 ptsOutstandingNot only identifies and rigorously evaluates all important evidence offered but also provides additional data for consideration; thoroughly discusses implications, conclusions, and consequences.2 ptsSatisfactoryIdentifies and evaluates the credibility of most of the important evidence; suggests some implications, conclusions, and consequences.1 ptsUnsatisfactoryFails to identify and evaluate the credibility of evidence; fails to consider implications, conclusions, and consequences.0 ptsIncomplete3 ptsTotal Points: 12PreviousNext

In this activity, you are going to further develop your analytical and writing skills while applying critical thinking by researching crime prevention programs that have proven successful in reducing crime. You will create a document highlighting the problem, giving an overview of the policy or program implemented, and the results of the program. The audience for your infographic is the city council.The specific steps for this assignment are as follows:Research a crime prevention policy or program that has been proven successful.Select a specific criminological theory that you believe supports the crime prevention policy or program.Write a 2-3 page paper that explains the context of the development of the program. Consider why the program was created. Did the city have an issue with DUIs, burglaries, or gang-related violence? Additionally, did a middle school have issues with bullying or fights?Offer an overview of the program or policy you researched and how it connects to your selected criminological theory. In creating this section, consider the most important steps of the program and how they align to criminological theory. For example, Project H.O.P.E. incorporated elements of deterrence theory with rational choice. You can see both theories in the creation of and implementation of the program.Lastly, your paper should highlight the results of the program. Consider why the program is considered successful. Be sure that your infographic depicts why the program is considered successful.

Please answer each question separately1. Compare and contrast general strain theory and deterrence theory. Be sure to expand on the key aspects of each theory while also explaining notable differences and how these theories contribute to an overall understanding of cybercrime. Your response must be at least 200 words in length.2.What does the term habeas corpus mean? Your response must be at least 75 words in length.3. How would you summarize the basic rights of a U.S. citizen? Your response must be at least 75 words in length.4. What is the Bill of Rights? Your response must be at least 75 words in length.5. Explain the history behind needing probable cause. Your response must be at least 75 words in length.