You just found out that the intervention program report you completed in week 5 was accepted by the Director of the Department of Health.She wants to move forward with a proposal to receive grant funding to create and implement the program. It all comes down to this; everything you have learned is now being put to the test. You can affect the lives of the residents of Anytown. You will submit both the proposal and a video presentation for this assignment.Part I: Based on all the information you have gathered regarding the opioid crisis, create a mini-grant proposal to submit to the Director of the Department of Health.In your grant proposal, be sure to include:A needs assessment:Discuss the reason for a needs assessment.Include the goals and desired outcomes of this assessment.Determine the stakeholders you would seek to help you complete the assessment. Explain your rationale for your selection.Explain the strengths and weakness of this assessment.List the resources you would recruit from the community to help you accomplish your goals.An intervention program to combat the opioid crisis (from your week 5 assignment):State your null hypothesis.Examine the type of intervention you would use.Describe the population sample you would target, why you chose this population, and how you would recruit your participants.Include any other stakeholders who were not included in your needs assessment.Discuss how you would ensure that the intervention is culturally appropriate.The evaluation process:Determine the desired outcome for this program.Detail the types of evaluations you would carry out for this program.Assess the type of statistical analysis appropriate for this intervention program.Explain the type of budget that would be appropriate for this process.The effects of this program on Anytown, U.S.A.:Analyze whether the results of this program are applicable to the general population.Based on your anticipated results, what local policies would you advocate for implementation, and what community stakeholders would assist with supporting these policies?Conclude with the potential effects of this proposal.Your proposal should be 5–7 pages in length, excluding title and reference page. Use current APA formatting to style your paper and to cite a minimum of four sources. Integrate a minimum of four scholarly sources into the paragraphs. Use internal citations pointing to evidence in the literature and supporting your ideas. You will need to include a reference page. Download Click here to access an example grant proposal.This is an accepted grant proposal that can help get you started. Please adhere to current APA guidelines.

written Reflection of Knowledge GainedWeekly Objective 3 is addressed in this assignment.Directions: Write a scholarly paper that reflects upon your new knowledge. Submit your paper as a Word document (.docx). Your paper should be 5 pages including title and reference page. Include three scholarly references in APA format. The following questions should be addressed in your reflection paper:Describe how your attitude of including aspects of health literacy in education has changed during this course.Describe your approach to incorporating evidence-based literature in health teaching.Describe the theory of teaching or learning that you applied to your presentation.Describe two ways that you have grown as a health educator by taking this course.Document the results of your teacher and learning objectives surveys.Please refer to your APA manual as well as the Purdue Owl website for guidelines with APA style.

**APA format, keep away from from the word "normal", use a lot of details to describe patient** You will perform a history of a neurologic problem that your instructor has provided you or one that you have experienced and perform an assessment of the neurologic system. You will document your subjective and objective findings, note any abnormal findings, and submit this in a Word document to the drop box provided. Title: Documentation of problem based assessment of the neurological system. Purpose of Assignment: Learning the required components of documenting a problem based subjective and objective assessment of neurological system. Identify abnormal findings. Course Competency: Apply assessment techniques for the neurological and respiratory systems. Instructions: Content: Use of three sections: Subjective, Objective, and Abnormal Findings Short descriptive paragraph of findings for each section Format: Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.) Documentation Grading Rubric- 10 possible points Levels of Achievement Criteria Emerging Competence Proficiency Mastery Subjective (4 Pts) Missing components such as biographic data, medications, or allergies. Symptoms analysis is incomplete. May contain objective data. Basic biographic data provided. Medications and allergies included. Symptoms analysis incomplete. Lacking detail. No objective data. Basic biographic data provided. Included list of medications and allergies. Symptoms analysis: PQRSTU completed. Lacking detail. No objective data. Information is solely what “client” provided. Basic biographic data provided. Included list of medications and allergies. Symptoms analysis: PQRSTU completed. Detailed. No objective data. Information is solely what “client” provided. Points: 0.5 Points:1 Points: 2 Points:4 Objective (4 Pts) Missing components of assessment for particular system. May contain subjective data. May have signs of bias or explanation of findings. May have included words such as “normal”, “appropriate”, “okay”, and “good”. Includes all components of assessment for particular system. Lacks detail. Uses words such as “normal”, “appropriate”, or “good”.Contains all objective information. May have signs of bias or explanation of findings. Includes all components of assessment for particular system. Avoided use of words such as “normal”, “appropriate”, or “good”.No bias or explanation for findings evident Contains all objective information Includes all components of assessment for particular system. Detailed information provided.Avoided use of words such as “normal”, “appropriate”, or “good”.No bias or explanation for findings evident. All objective information Points: 1 Points: 2 Points: 3 Points: 4 Strength and Weakness (2 Pts) Lists one strength and one weakness with no description or reason for selection of them. Failure to provide both one strength and weakness will result in zero points for this criteria. Provides brief description of one strength and one weakness with no reason for identification of the strength and weakness. Provides description of one strength and one weakness noted on assessment. Gives reason for identification of the strength and weakness. Detailed description of one strength and one weakness noted during assessment. Detailed reason provided for identifying the strength and weakness. Points: 0.5 Points: 1 Points: 1.5 Points: 2