Link to video: https://youtu.be/QZIa4kutkIM I want you to watch the attached video about the Holy Rollers of West Virginia. From an etic point of view I want you examine  this group of people and how they practice their religion.  To do this I want you to explain. 1) How does the video connect with the nine universal characteristics? 2) Identify three of the nine in the video

Forensic AssessmentFor this assignment, you will conduct Internet research on the Elizabeth Smart kidnapping trials. In brief, Smart was abducted at the age of fourteen from her home in Utah. Over nine months later, she was found with her kidnappers, Brian David Mitchell and Wanda Ileen Barzee (now deceased). During Mitchell's trial, consideration was given with respect to whether he was competent to stand trial. The legal standard for "competence to stand trial" has not changed since the US Supreme Court decision: "Our challenge is whether [the defendant] has sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding, and whether he has a rational as well as a factual understanding of the proceedings against him" (Stafford, 2003).While conducting your research, pay particular attention to the information you obtain regarding her kidnapper Mitchell. Based on your research, address the following:Describe Mitchell's profile. Describe some of his personality traits, and explain what you learned about his mental state at the time of the trial.Explain how you would proceed with assessing Mitchell's competency to stand trial. Analyze the considerations you would make, and based on your analysis, explain whether you think he was competent to stand trial.Describe your views about Mitchell's competency compared to the criminal justice process and how it measures competency. Analyze and explain whether there are any discrepancies or conflicts between these views. Additionally, for this assignment, you will explore how clinicians determine competency to stand trial. To prepare, you may read the following articles from the Internet or the South University Online Library: Heilbrun, K., Hawk, G., & Tate, D. C. (1996). Juvenile competence to stand trial: Research issues in practice. Law and Human Behavior, 20(5), 573–578.Lipsitt, P. D., Lelos, D., & McGarry, A. L. (1971). Competency for trial: A screening instrument. American Journal of Psychiatry, 128(1), 105–109.Zapf, P. A., &Roesch, R. (2000). Mental competency evaluations: Guidelines for judges and attorneys. Court Review, 37, 28–35.After reviewing the articles, address the following:Explain how clinicians determine competency. Identify the factors that clinicians consider when determining competencies.Explain what is considered the standard for determining whether a person is competent to stand trial.Describe some of the reasons evaluators must separate the developmental stages from the psychopathological causes of competence.

The second part of the prompt asks you to grade yourself on a scale of one to ten on how responsible you are for sweatshops. Your answer to this question should be the topic sentence to either your third or fourth body paragraph (depending on how many paragraphs you wrote for Part One). Your explanation to the grade you give yourself, (along with support from either the assigned article, supporting articles, or documentary), should form the body paragraph. The idea behind having you grade yourself on how responsible you are for sweatshops, is to have you think about your place in the global community, and to think about how your actions affect others around the world (if you think they affect others at all). The final body paragraph should be your counter argument and rebuttal paragraph. The counter argument  should recognize be against who you said is the most to blame for sweatshops. The rebuttal should counter, the counter argument and explain why your argument in who you blame is correct.