Investigative Summary Report, law assignment help

User Generated

QrerxCEB

Business Finance

Description

Assignment 2: Investigative Summary Report

After reading the Leopold-Loeb Case, use the template below and write an investigative summary report from the perspective of an Investigator of this crime describing the basic investigative techniques utilized in the case. The case can be found on the Reading page in the unit when you click on the Web Resources icon. Your report should address all of the following:

  1. First, answer who, what, where, when, why and how from reading the case.
  2. How was the victim, Bobby Frank killed and with what type of weapon?
  3. What would be the primary characteristics of this type of wound?
  4. The investigator’s linked key evidence from this crime scene to the original source, what was the source, and how valuable was that source of information in connecting one of the defendants to the crime scene?
  5. How would you categorize the motive for the killing in this case?
  6. What type of homicide was this case Leopold-Loeb compared to the types that were learned in the chapter readings?
  7. Did this case follow the normal investigative procedures, if so how?

The entire attached template is to be completed. Link to case:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/monkeytrial/peopleeve...

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Criminal Investigative Report Criminal Investigative Report CASE #:________________________ DATE: ______________TIME RECEIVED:___________ CASE TYPE: _____________________________________________ Complainant: Address: City/State: Phones: Location of Offense: Date and Time of Offense: Victim: Suspect to Victim (relationship): Weapons/Tools Used: Case Synopsis: This is a brief synopsis of the case from start to finish. Suspect [ ] Arrested [ ] Name: DOB: Date of Arrest: Detective: Supervisor: Case Status: Date Case Report Submitted: 1 Criminal Investigative Report FINGERPRINTS: Developed : Yes [ ] No [ ] By whom: Comparison with Defendant(s) : Yes [ ] No [ ] By Whom: Identification Made : Yes [ ] No [ ] By Whom: PHOTOGRAPHS: Scene : Yes [ ] No [ ] By Whom: Victim : Yes [ ] No [ ] By Whom: Evidence : Yes [ ] No [ ] By Whom: Defendant(s) : Yes [ ] No [ ] By Whom: LINE-UP INFORMATION: Phot Line-up : Yes [ ] No [ ] Identification Made: Yes [ ] No [ ] Physical Line-up : Yes [ ] No [ ] Identification Made: Yes [ ] No [ ] Confrontation : Yes [ ] No [ ] Identification Made: Yes [ ] No [ ] SEARCH AND SEIZURE: Consent to Search : Yes [ ] No [ ] By Whom: To Whom: Search Warrant : Yes [ ] No [ ] Incident to Arrest : Yes [ ] No [ ] Property Seized : Yes [ ] No [ ] By Whom: CONFESSION/ADMISSION: To Law Enforcement Oral [ ] Written [ ] Taped [ ] To Other Oral [ ] Written [ ] Taped [ ] : Yes [ ] No [ ] By Whom: To Whom: : Yes [ ] No [ ] By Whom: To Whom: 2 Criminal Investigative Report Complainant/Victim Name Address Phones Place of Employment Email Address Testify to Independent Witness Name Address Phones Place of Employment Email Address Testify to Emergency Medical Witness Name Address Phones Place of Employment Email Address Testify to 3 Criminal Investigative Report Law Enforcement Witness Name Detective’s Narrative _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________. 4 Criminal Investigative Report Address Phones Place of Employment Email Address Testify to 5
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

hey friend, i have posted the answers, kindly confirm and contact me if you need any clarifications, Thanks
hey friend, i have posted the answers, kindly confirm and contact me if you need any clarifications, Thanks

Running Head: INVESTIGATIVE SUMMARY REPORT

Investigative Summary Report
Name:
Institutional Affiliation:

1

INVESTIGATIVE SUMMARY REPORT

2

Investigative Summary Report
Nathan Leopold Freudethal, Jr was a child who came from a wealthy family and studied
law at Universty of Chicago at the time of their crime. On the other hand, Richard Loeb Albert a
nineteen-year-old partner in crime was also brilliant and wealthy Chicago teenagers who decided
to commit what they described as a perfect crime by kidnapping and killing a 14 years old Bobby
Frank on 21st May 1924. While Loeb was obsessed with the opinion of the perfect crime, Leopold
was for the idea that there is a possibility of rising above evil that is Superman.
Loeb and Leopold were very best of friends, and at some point, Leopold thought of killing
Loeb over breach of secrecy. The two boys had wired relationship between them that lead them to
kill Bobby Frank. The two boys planned and kidnapped Frank who was also coming from a
wea...


Anonymous
I was stuck on this subject and a friend recommended Studypool. I'm so glad I checked it out!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags