Step 1 – Locate case United States Supreme Court case of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990).The full text of this case, along with numerous case briefs, commentaries, summaries, etc., may be found by simply entering the full name of the case into any major online search engine of your choosing.Step 2 – Read case. Review the following questions:• What was the ultimate numerical vote of the court?• When and how can life support be withdrawn?• How does death by refusal of treatment differ from suicide?• How does a living will work and when does it become of legal effect?• What is a health care directive and how does it work?Step 3 – After completing your research, summarize your answers, and, along with any other sources, if any, address and support your particular position/view on the following specific issues, and, specifically, how you would apply the Saint Leo University Core Values of Community, Respect, and Integrity into your actions. Be sure to use proper APA format for citations.1. What are the potential foreseeable financial, psychological, and medical, yet unintended, harmful consequences to one’s family and friends in failing to provide a properly executed will and living will prior to one’s final illness and death?2. What are the fundamental distinctions between recuperative medical care and palliative care? Who should be included in the decision to modify care from recuperative to palliative? When, if ever, is the right to refuse any and all medical care appropriate when such virtually ensures the death of the patient?3. What professionals, medical or otherwise, should be involved in advising decisions concerning end-of life wishes? How does euthanasia differ from a simple cessation of treatment? Who should make end of life decisions for those who are without a family member to take on such a role?4. What measures can be taken to ensure the quality of ongoing family and social relationships, individually and as a group, to end-of-life patients? What pitfalls are to be avoided in ensuring maintenance of these relationships? What actions may be taken to ensure the spiritual and existential dimensions of the process are respected and integrated? You must submit this assignment as a Word document to Chalk and Wire no later than Sunday 11:59 PM EST/EDT.Ed Pedrreero, JD  Instructor Writing Paper Guide Posted Apr 14, 2020 2:07 PM  The following are writing tips to be used in future assignments. Your introduction should only take up a third to a half of your first page and that it should not be used to provide the specific facts and figures of your argument, as those belong in your body paragraphs.Your introduction's purpose is to let your reader know what you will be discussing and to provide any context or necessary background information that they would need to know before stating your thesis.Avoid referring to your paper within the paper itself. Rather than saying what you are going to discuss, for example "This paper will talk about contracts," go ahead and give your main idea and how you will be approaching that idea. In this way you can indicate the topics you will be addressing by showing their relationship to the main idea rather than announcing that they will be discussed.Be sure to clearly indicate your main idea as well as how you will be approaching the topic. This will help you organize your own information, as well as prepare your reader for how you are going to be presenting the information.As you organize your paper, make sure each body paragraph focuses on developing one supporting point from your thesis statement and that each point clearly leads into another. This will help with the flow of your paper and will also make sure that your thesis is fully supported and elaborated.Remember that your conclusion should be a summary of the points and ideas that you have already discussed throughout the body paragraphs of your essay. Your conclusion should not include any new points, ideas, or information. FIRST & SECOND PERSON USAGE It is generally unaccepted to use the first or second person (I, you, we, our) in academic writing, as it is considered to be too informal to refer to yourself or your reader directly. Avoid asking your reader rhetorical questions, as it is considered to be too informal to refer to your reader directly. QUOTES, CITATIONS, & RESEARCH. When it comes to using direct quotes, a good rule to follow is to have at least three sentences in your own words for every one sentence of quotes. Quotes should be used to support your words rather than to make your point.It is important to include some context when you introduce a person in your essay. Even if you make it clear that this person is the author of the article you're referring to, that does not indicate why this person's opinion is relevant or important. If they are a researcher or scientist or an expert in the field, it is important to let your reader know in order to add validity to your support. POST What was the ultimate numerical vote of the Court?  In a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that while people enchanted in the privilege to reject treatment under the Due Process Clause, inept people were not ready to exercise such rights, the Court found the State of Missouri's activities intended to save human life to be sacred, (Cerminara, 2019). Since there were no certification relatives who would dependably act to the most significant advantage of bumbling patients and claiming wrong choices to pull back treatment were irreversible, the Court maintained the state's uplifted evidentiary necessities.  When and how can life support be withdrawn?  When clinically, the deterioration starts and the patient's illness is at the maturing stage, it doesn't react to the treatment. The patients become non-responsive to the respective treatment.I submitted it through tutor.com and the tutor stated that the first paragraph needed to be completely redone and When and how can life support be withdrawn? More needed to be added to that.           Remove extra words [JS1]          A sentence fragment is a group of words that looks like a sentence, but actually isn't a complete sentence. Sentence fragments are usually missing a subject or verb, or they do not express a complete thought. While it may be punctuated to look like a complete sentence, a fragment cannot stand on its own. [JS2] What was the ultimate numerical vote of the Court?In a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that while people enchanted in the privilege to reject treatment under the Due Process Clause, inept people were not ready to exercise such rights, the Court found the State of Missouri's activities intended to save human life to be sacred, (Cerminara, 2019). Since there were no certification relatives who would dependably act to the most significant advantage of bumbling patients and claiming wrong choices to pull back treatment were irreversible, the Court maintained the state's uplifted evidentiary necessities.When and how can life support be withdrawn?When clinically, the deterioration starts and the patient's illness is at the maturing stage, it doesn't react to the treatment. The patients become non-responsive to the respective treatment.I submitted it through tutor.com and the tutor stated that the first paragraph needed to be completely redone and When and how can life support be withdrawn? More needed to be added to that.

This week you were introduced to different degrees of murder, and the lesser included offenses of voluntary and involuntary manslaughter. Now you will review the following scenario in which these offenses come into play.ScenarioCecelia and Robbie are a married couple and they have been dealing with some marital troubles for the past several months. Cecelia suspects that her husband Robbie has been resuming an intimate relationship with his co-worker Helen. Cecelia’s suspicions arise from the fact that Robbie has frequently been coming home late from work, and he has been spending weekends away on business trips with Helen.Last week Cecelia arrived home from work to find Robbie speaking on his cell phone. Cecelia suspects that Robbie may be speaking to Helen, because she overhears Robbie saying things such as, “I enjoy spending time with you,” and “let’s get away for the weekend and I will tell Cecelia it is another work trip”. Cecelia interrupts Robbie and asks him with whom he is speaking. Robbie is startled but replies that he is speaking with a client. Angered by what she believes is a lie, Cecelia storms into the bedroom and slams the door.After spending some time in the bedroom, Cecelia decides to confront Robbie. While yelling at him she tells him, “I know you’ve been cheating on me!” Distraught and visibly angry, Robbie replies, “Yes, what else did you expect? You’re a lousy wife, and I never wanted to marry you.” He then hits Cecelia and pushes her to the floor causing a bruise to her chest and left arm. Robbie pauses for a moment to await Cecelia’s response. Hearing none, he continues his tirade: “I’ll divorce you in a hot second. I’ll get the best divorce lawyer in town, and you’ll walk out of this marriage without a dime.” A moment later, Cecelia asked Robbie whether he really means what he said. He responds that he did and also says “what are you going to do about it?” Cecelia replies, “give me a minute,” and then begins to experience an intense panic attack with accompanying heart palpitations which, according to her account of the incident, clouded her ability to think clearly. A few moments later, she walks over to the closet to grab a handgun, and hides it behind her back. Cecelia then walks over to Robbie and shoots him 10 times in various parts of his body. He soon dies as a result. After shooting Robbie, she goes to his phone to pull up Helen’s address and phone number. She drives over to Helen’s house and knocks on her door. When Helen answers she shoots her in the chest and then takes off back to her vehicle where she quickly drives off. Cecelia is later apprehended for the murder of Robbie and Helen. What charges will be indicted on as a result of her actions?Response & IndictmentYou are a paralegal living in Minnesota working for the state’s prosecution and have been asked to research the possible charges for this scenario and draft an indictment.Part IFirst, respond to the following question in a memo using the IRAC Method. In a 2-3 page response answer the following:Is manslaughter the best possible charge against Cecilia in this scenario or does the state have enough evidence for a first degree murder charge? Be sure to cite (using Bluebook Standards) all relevant statutes from the State of Minnesota.Refer to the following FAQ in composing your IRAC memo.What is the IRAC Method?Part IIBased on your conclusions in your IRAC method memo, construct an indictment. Use the below resources to help you structure your indictment.Note: This sample is from Georgia. You can use this sample as a template, but you will need to research the statutes in Minnesota and present it from the State of Minnesota. You can use Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, and Minnesota Judicial Circuit as your geographical location, but you will need to identify the relevant statutes in Minnesota.Here is a site where you can research the relevant Minnesota criminal statutes: 2018 Minnesota Statutes Chapter 609 Criminal Code.***** PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT FOR EXAMPLES.