CCJS 321 UMGC Week 8 Advent of Internet Enhanced Terrorism in the World Discussion

User Generated

qqvyyba1139

Writing

CCJS 321

University of Maryland Global Campus

CCJS

Description

Do you believe that we are winning the war on terrorism online? Why or why not? Suggest one policy implication that you think should be put in place to target one area of national security and/or terrorism online and discuss how this policy would help to thwart terroristic activities online or better protect people in the online environment.

https://www.justice.gov/archive/ll/highlights.htm

https://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/global-terroris...

https://learn.umgc.edu/content/enforced/544170-027...

https://learn.umgc.edu/content/enforced/544170-027...

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Criteria Excellent Above Average Average Below Average Poor Criterion Score 20 points 17.9 points 15.9 points 13.9 points 11.9 points / 20 Content of original post/demonstration of material command/integration of course materials and other readings. Demonstrated a clear understanding of the weekly material/subject and articulated command of content/subject into well stated post responses; and/or displayed critical thinking by bringing in more than 2 relevant resources and by promoting significant further thought on the topic. Points available: 18-20 Displayed a good understanding of weekly material /subject that was presented in most posts; and/or displayed critical thinking by bringing in at least 2 relevant resources promoting further thoughts on the topic. Points available: 16-17.9 Displayed an understanding of weekly material/subject but did not fully articulate their understanding; and/or displayed minimal critical thinking by bringing in only 2 relevant resources that minimally promoted further thoughts on the topic. Points available: 14-15.9 Displayed very little understanding of the weekly material /subject and did not articulate an understanding; and/or did not demonstrate critical thinking as evidenced by having 1 or less relevant resources which minimally promoted further thoughts on the topic; and/or displayed poor command of subject matter. Points available: 12-13.9 Failed to display any understanding of the week's materials; and/or incorrectly addressed the weekly material/subject; and/ or did not display critical thinking; or did not bring in relevant resources to support thoughts; or did not promote further thoughts on the topic; or did not display command of subject matter. Points available F: 0 - 11.9 No post = 0 Timeliness of original 5 points 4.4 points 3.9 points 3.4 points 2.9 points /5 post Posts original discussions by day two (2) of the academic week. Points available: 4.5-5 Posts original discussions by day three (3) of the academic week. Points available: 4-4.4 Posts original discussions by day four (4) of the academic week. Points available: 3.5-3.9 Posts original discussion by day five (5) of the academic week. Points available: 3-3.4 Posts original discussion by day six (6) or seven (7) of the academic week. Points available F: 0-2.9 No Post = 0 10 points 8.9 points 7.9 points 6.9 points O points / 10 Peer response content/weekly involvement in discussion board. Did not engage in discussion with peers Engaged in discussion with at least three (3) peers whereby an idea was built upon or refuted and displayed exemplary critical thinking. Points available: 9-10 Engaged in discussion with at least two (2) peers whereby an idea was built upon or refuted and displayed good critical thinking. Points available: 8-8.9 Engaged in discussion with at least one (1) peer whereby an idea was built upon or refuted. Points available: 7-7.9 Replies to others but did not built upon or refute peer thoughts. Points available D: 6-6.9 F: 0-5.9 Timeliness of peer 5 points 4.4 points 3.9 points 3.4 points 2.9 points /5 posts. Posts peer discussions by day three (3) of the academic week. Points available: 4.5-5 Posts peer discussions by day four (4) of the academic week. Points available: 4-4.4 Posts peer discussions by day five (5) of the academic week. Points available: 3.5-3.9 Posts peer discussion by day six (6) of the academic week. Points available D: 3-3.4 Posts peer discussion on day six (7) of the academic week. Points available Points available F: 0-2.9 No Post = 0 8.9 points 6.9 points O points / 10 Adherence to Discussion Forum Standards and Guidelines. 10 points All standards followed as required (ie. APA format; grammar; citations; references, other standards as required). Points available: 9-10 No posts for the discussion. 1 discussion standard not followed (i.e. APA format; grammar; citations; references, other standards as required). Points available: 8-8.9 7.9 points 2-3 discussion standards not followed (i.e. APA format; grammar; citations; references, other standards as required). Points available: 7-7.9 4 or more discussion standards not followed (i.e. APA format; grammar; citations; references, other standards as required). Points available D: 6-6.9 Points available F: 0-5.9
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Let me know if you need edits :)

Running head: COUNTERTERRORISM

1

Counterterrorism
Name
Institution

COUNTERTERRORISM

2
Counterterrorism

The advent of the internet enhanced terrorism in the world. This is by connecting
terrorists around the world. Internet connects people, both when doing good and when doing ill.
Because of its global scale, terrorists consider the internet as the best platform for conducting
their activities. They use it in various ways. One, they use it to spread their extremist ideologies
and recruit new members. In light of this, terrorist groups post terrorism content online
(Department of Justice, n.d). This content radicalizes consumers. Ultimately, those individuals
join terrorist organizations. This makes terrorist organizations stronger. To this effect, winning
the war on t...


Anonymous
Super useful! Studypool never disappoints.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags