Need help with essay for Biology (1-3) page paper

User Generated

wnaqf

Science

Description

Need help with essay for Biology. Topic I chose is on Invasive Lionfish but open to any suggestions as long as it's related to biology.  Please find attached assignment along with grading rubric.

Original work only.

Assignment 1 Description and Rubric.docx 

Unformatted Attachment Preview

SCI 115 – Assignments and Rubrics Assignment 1: Biology Article Due Week 5 and worth 120 points Use the Internet to research aspects of biology. Select one (1) article from a magazine or newspaper that has something in it that pertains to biology. This will serve as the ―target article‖ for this assignment. For instance, you can select an article about medicine, invasive species, nature, conservation, genetic technology, ecology, or any other topic that is related to biology. One purpose of this assignment is to help you become aware of how biology is related to your everyday life. Write a one to three (1-3) page paper in which you: 1. Summarize the article in one (1) or more paragraphs, using your own words. Be sure to identify the article using an in-text citation in the body of the paper, as well as a reference in the reference section. 2. Explain how the article relates to this course. Identify which biological concepts from the course and / or text are relevant to the topic covered in the article. Citing the course text, discuss the ways in which this course does (or doesn’t) provide background information to help you understand the article and the larger issues surrounding it. 3. Explain why the article caught your attention. Relate the article to your life and to issues that are important to you. Discuss how or if the scientific knowledge about the topic covered in the article affects you directly or indirectly. 4. Discuss your opinion on how research on this topic should be funded. State whether you think taxpayer monies should support research on this topic or whether such research in this area should be funded by the private sector. Rate the importance of research on this topic, relative to other areas of research. In addition to the target article, you should use at least one (1) additional resource, such as your textbook or another article. You must have a reference section which contains an APA reference to your chosen article and all other sources. Additionally, you must provide in-text citations (in APA format) to your references in the body of the text. Integrate all sources into your paper using proper techniques of quoting, paraphrasing and summarizing, along with your in-text citations. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. Points: 120 Criteria 1. Summarize the article in one (1) or more paragraphs, using your own words. Be sure to identify the article using an in-text citation in the body of the paper, as well as a reference in the reference section. Weight: 20% 2. Explain how the article relates to this course. Identify which biological concepts from the course and / or text are relevant to the topic covered in the article. Citing the course text, discuss the ways in which this course does (or doesn’t) provide background information to help you understand the article and the larger issues surrounding it. Weight: 20% Assignment 1: Biology Article Meets Minimum Unacceptable Expectations Fair Proficient Below 60% F 60-69% D 70-79% C 80-89% Did not submit or incompletely summarized the article in one (1) or more paragraphs, using your own words. Did not submit or incompletely identified the article using an in-text citation in the body of the paper, as well as a reference in the reference section. Did not submit or incompletely explained how the article relates to this course. Did not submit or incompletely identified which biological concepts from the course and / or text are relevant to the topic covered in the article. Did not submit or incompletely discussed the ways in which this course does (or doesn’t) provide background information to help you understand the article and the larger issues surrounding it. Exemplary 90-100% Insufficiently summarized the article in one or more paragraphs, using your own words. Insufficiently identified the article using an in-text citation in the body of the paper, as well as a reference in the reference section. Partially summarized the article in one (1) or more paragraphs, using your own words. Partially identified the article using an in-text citation in the body of the paper, as well as a reference in the reference section. Satisfactorily summarized the article in one (1) or more paragraphs, using your own words. Satisfactorily identified the article using an in-text citation in the body of the paper, as well as a reference in the reference section. Thoroughly summarized the article in one (1) or more paragraphs, using your own words. Thoroughly identified the article using an in-text citation in the body of the paper, as well as a reference in the reference section. Insufficiently explained how the article relates to this course. Insufficiently identified which biological concepts from the course and / or text are relevant to the topic covered in the article. Insufficiently discussed the ways in which this course does (or doesn’t) provide background information to help you understand the article and the larger issues surrounding it. Partially explained how the article relates to this course. Partially identified which biological concepts from the course and / or text are relevant to the topic covered in the article. Partially discussed the ways in which this course does (or doesn’t) provide background information to help you understand the article and the larger issues surrounding it. Satisfactorily explained how the article relates to this course. Satisfactorily identified which biological concepts from the course and / or text are relevant to the topic covered in the article. Satisfactorily discussed the ways in which this course does (or doesn’t) provide background information to help you understand the article and the larger issues surrounding it. Thoroughly explained how the article relates to this course. Thoroughly identified which biological concepts from the course and / or text are relevant to the topic covered in the article. Thoroughly discussed the ways in which this course does (or doesn’t) provide background information to help you understand the article and the larger issues surrounding it. 3. Explain why the article caught your attention. Relate the article to your life and to issues that are important to you. Discuss how or if the scientific knowledge about the topic covered in the article affects you directly or indirectly. Weight: 20% 4. Discuss your opinion on how research on this topic should be funded. State whether you think taxpayer monies should support research on this topic or whether such research in this area should be funded by the private sector. Rate the importance of research on this topic, relative to other areas of research. Weight: 15% 5. Writing / Support for ideas. Weight: 5% 6. Writing / Grammar and mechanics (5%) Did not submit or incompletely explained why the article caught your attention. Did not submit or incompletely related the article to your life and to issues that are important to you. Did not submit or incompletely discussed how or if the scientific knowledge about the topic covered in the article affects you directly or indirectly. Did not submit or incompletely discussed your opinion on how research on this topic should be funded. Did not submit or incompletely stated whether you think taxpayer monies should support research on this topic or whether such research in this area should be funded by the private sector. Did not submit or incompletely rated the importance of research on this topic, relative to other areas of research. Never uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation Insufficiently explained why the article caught your attention. Insufficiently related the article to your life and to issues that are important to you. Insufficiently discussed how or if the scientific knowledge about the topic covered in the article affects you directly or indirectly. Partially explained why the article caught your attention. Partially related the article to your life and to issues that are important to you. Partially discussed how or if the scientific knowledge about the topic covered in the article affects you directly or indirectly. Satisfactorily explained why the article caught your attention. Satisfactorily related the article to your life and to issues that are important to you. Satisfactorily discussed how or if the scientific knowledge about the topic covered in the article affects you directly or indirectly. Thoroughly explained why the article caught your attention. Thoroughly related the article to your life and to issues that are important to you. Thoroughly discussed how or if the scientific knowledge about the topic covered in the article affects you directly or indirectly. Insufficiently discussed your opinion on how research on this topic should be funded. Insufficiently stated whether you think taxpayer monies should support research on this topic or whether such research in this area should be funded by the private sector. Insufficiently rated the importance of research on this topic, relative to other areas of research. Partially discussed your opinion on how research on this topic should be funded. Partially stated whether you think taxpayer monies should support research on this topic or whether such research in this area should be funded by the private sector. Partially rated the importance of research on this topic, relative to other areas of research. Satisfactorily discussed your opinion on how research on this topic should be funded. Satisfactorily stated whether you think taxpayer monies should support research on this topic or whether such research in this area should be funded by the private sector. Satisfactorily rated the importance of research on this topic, relative to other areas of research. Thoroughly discussed your opinion on how research on this topic should be funded. Thoroughly stated whether you think taxpayer monies should support research on this topic or whether such research in this area should be funded by the private sector. Thoroughly rated the importance of research on this topic, relative to other areas of research. Rarely uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation Partially uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation Mostly uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation Consistently uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. Free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation 7. Writing and Information Literacy / Integration of Sources (5%) Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism or failure to use intext citations. Sources are rarely integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations 8. Information Literacy / Crediting Sources in APA (5%) Lack of citations and/or lack of reference section and/or citations don’t correspond to listed references In-text citations and references are given, but not in APA format Mostly shows correct use of intext citations with matching references using APA-format Consistently shows correct use of In-text citations with matching references using APA-format 9. Information Literacy / Research (5%) Quantity and/or quality of sources are unacceptable Target article and/or supporting citations are of poor quality Partially shows correct (or approximately correct) use of in-text citations, with matching references using APA-format The target article is of good quality, but the quality of other sources cited is questionable. The target article is of good quality and any other resources are of sufficient quality. The target article selected is of good quality and any other resources used are quality.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer


Anonymous
I was stuck on this subject and a friend recommended Studypool. I'm so glad I checked it out!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags