In this Discussion you will critique the actions of an administrator interacting with a peer leader, the organizational CIO, in a stressful situation involving data compromise. You are asked to think through various risk management strategies that might have been deployed to avoid this type of a situation in the future. Emphasis is placed on leadership behaviors and recommendations on how this leader might have acted differently to achieve the most constructive outcome in a volatile situation.Video Prompt and Response: CIO with administrator exploring first access. Breach of security protocol.To prepare:Review the Protecting Patient Data I media piece in your Learning ResourcesReflect on the principles of security, privacy, and ethics as they apply to HIT systems and this scenario.Consider risk management strategies for the management of strategic information assets using best IT industry practices.Post:Prepare a comment in response to the Protecting Patient Data Imedia piece. Critique the actions of the administrator in her conversation with the CIO. From a security, privacy, and ethics standpoint how might the administrator have handled the conversation differently? What risk management strategies could have been used?

Throughout this course, you analyzed your current work environment to identify their acquiring, developing, and training practices. Employees are the biggest asset and contribute to the culture and overall performance of the organization. The final part of this project requires you to determine how to leverage on the human capital within your organization. Use the research you have complied throughout this course to determine how to appropriately develop and motivate your employees.

Develop a 4-5 page quality/performance improvement framework for your doctoral project.Quality/performance improvement (QI/PI) frameworks are used to establish and evaluate processes in practice. The most common models for such a framework are Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) and Six Sigma Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC). The purpose of this assessment is to use key information from your project charter to develop a QI/PI framework from which you will begin developing a project implementation plan and logic model in the next assessment.Demonstration of ProficiencyBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:Competency 1: Align the project charter with a continuous improvement model.Describe the current practice needing improvement.Explain how QI/PI data will be collected and analyzed.Describe the proposed QI/PI changes and expected outcomes.Explain how changes in quality or performance will be evaluated.Competency 6: Address assessment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.PreparationNote: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s Writing Support page. InstructionsNote: The assessments in this course must be completed in the order presented; subsequent assessments should be built on both your earlier work and your instructor’s feedback on earlier assessments. If you choose to submit assessments prematurely, without considering and integrating your instructor’s feedback, your assessment may be returned ungraded, resulting in your loss of an assessment attempt.Develop a quality/performance improvement (QI/PI) framework for your project, aligned with your project charter. Choose a model for your framework, using the PDCA or DMAIC model, a model used in your organization, or another familiar reputable model that is suitable for your project. PDCA or DMAIC model information and examples are included in Resources.Provide a succinct, scholarly narrative that reflects the content of your model and addresses the key points outlined below:Graded RequirementsEach of the main tasks corresponds to scoring guide criteria. Read the performance-level descriptions in the scoring guide for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.Describe the current practice needing improvement.What is the problem and its root cause?What is the gap between what is and what should be?What evidence supports your assertions and conclusions?Explain how QI/PI data will be collected and analyzed.What data is needed?How will you record and organize collected data?What are appropriate data analysis methods for the type of data you will be collecting?Describe proposed QI/PI changes and expected outcomes.What are appropriate measures for determining actual improvement?How feasible are the proposed changes and what are the relevant contextual factors that can affect expected outcomes?Explain how changes in quality or performance will be evaluated.What evaluation tools or methods will you use?What criteria will you use to evaluate outcomes?Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.Write with a specific purpose and audience in mind.Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards.Proofread your writing to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult for them to focus on the substance of your introduction.Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.Document Format and LengthFormat your QI/PI framework narrative using current APA style.An APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] is provided to help you in writing and formatting your narrative. Be sure to include:A title page and references page. An abstract is not required.Appropriate section headings.Your paper should comprise 4–5 pages of narrative plus title and references pages.Include your framework model as an appendix.Additional RequirementsBefore submitting your assessment, proofread it to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult for them to focus on the substance of your QI/PI framework.