Proceso de Enfermería Aplicado al Adulto y Viejo con Conductas Inadaptables en la Necesidad de Oxigenación: Fluidos, Electrolitos y Balance Ácido-Base. Medicina y cirugia

Health Medical

University of the Sacred Heart

Question Description

este es un foro que necesito hacer para el dia 18 de enero, necesito hacer un post inicial que esta en el documento adjunto, tambien necesito 5 replies a 5 companeros, necesito que ellos posteen primero y luego yo les enviare sus posts y asi poder contestar, son replies sencillos, el mas importante es el post inicial. esto es 100 español.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Discusión Grupal Módulo 2: Proceso de Enfermería Aplicado al Adulto y Viejo con Conductas Inadaptables en la Necesidad de Oxigenación: Fluidos, Electrolitos y Balance Ácido-Base Discusión grupal módulo 2: Proceso de Enfermería Aplicado al Adulto y Viejo con Conductas Inadaptables en la Necesidad de Oxigenación: Fluidos, Electrolitos y Balance Ácido-Base Llega cliente adulto con episodios de vómitos y diarreas. Al hacerle el estimado físico, usted encuentra los siguientes hallazgos: piel pálida, reseca y escamosa, mucosa oral y lengua escamosa, observa episodios de desorientación esporádicas y debilidad leve al caminar distancias cortas. Cliente refiere: "no como ni bebo nada desde ayer". Al momento, usted no tiene resultados de laboratorios que validen un posible cuadro de desbalance hidroeléctrico. Entonces les pregunto: ¿qué usted haría con el cliente para manejar su estado de salud actual? Argumente su presentación. Instrucciones Para contestar el foro, tome en consideración lo siguiente: 1. Cliente no ha sido evaluado por el doctor (no cuenta con órdenes médicas). 2. Concéntrese en intervenciones de enfermería independientes. 3. Valide su aportación con literatura científica, relacionada a la profesión de enfermería y actualizada (no más de 5 años de publicación). Favor de leer cuidadosamente las siguientes instrucciones: 1. Conteste exclusivamente, las preguntas guías del foro. 2. Su aportación y presentación al foro debe ser bajo un estricto ambiente de respeto y cordialidad. 3. Siga las reglas gramaticales y de ortografía correctamente. 4. El foro esta programado de manera tal que usted presente su aportación primero antes de tener acceso a la de sus compañeros de clase. 5. Reaccione a, mínimo, cuatro (5) compañeros de clase. 6. Tanto su presentación como las reacciones a sus compañeros, debe tener un mínimo de 50 palabras. No podrá someter participación ni reacción alguna si no cumple con dicha directriz. No hay máximo de palabras. 7. Refiérase a las normas de *Netiquette*, , para la redacción correcta de comunicación en línea. 8. Recuerde incluir las referencias y citas según formato APA. 9. De tener algún inconveniente, no dude en comunicarse con su profesora. Rubrica Rúbrica: Foros de Discusión Rúbrica: Foros de Discusión Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Assignment Posting This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation Ratings 4 pts Excellent Posts well developed assignment that fully addresses and develops all aspects of the task. 4 pts Excellent The student actively participated in the forum in the period to carry out this dynamic of discussion and made a minimum of 4 contributions to different partners that the activity required. 3 pts Very Good Posts well developed assignment that addresses all aspects of the task; but lacks full development of concepts. 3 pts Very Good The student participated actively in the forum in the period to carry out this dynamic of discussion and made only 3 contributions to different partners that the activity required. 2 pts Satisfactory Posts adequate assignment with superficial thoughts and without preparation; but doesn’t address all aspects of the task. 2 pts Satisfactory The student participated actively in the forum in the period to carry out this dynamic of discussion and made only 2 contributions to different partners that the activity required. Pts 1 pts Deficient Posts not adequate assignment with superficial thoughts no clear and without preparation; doesn’t address all aspects of the task. 1 pts Deficient The student participated actively in the forum in the period to carry out this dynamic of discussion and made only 1 contribution to different partners that the activity required. 0 pts Not Present The student did not participate, nor did he make contributions to his classmates. 0 pts Not Present The student did not participate, nor did he make contributions to his classmates. 4 pts 4 pts Rúbrica: Foros de Discusión Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollow-Up Postings and Participation Relevance Ratings 4 pts Excellent The participation's demonstrate a total mastery of the topic to be discussed, as well as the integration of ideas and information or knowledge relevant to the topic that enrich the dialogue among the forum participants. Sustain your contributions with evidence of sources of updated information. 3 pts Very Good The participation's demonstrate a good command of the topic to be discussed, as well as the integration of ideas and information or knowledge relevant to the topic that enrich the dialogue among the forum participants. In most of the contributions made by the student support his opinion with evidence of sources of updated information. 2 pts Satisfactory The participation's demonstrate an average domain of the topic to be discussed, but the student needs to improve and, almost does not manage to integrate information or knowledge that complements the dialogue. Not in all contributions supports their opinions with evidence when debating the issue. Pts 1 pts Deficient The participation's show little or no dominion of the topic to be discussed and do not integrate data or additional information. Rarely sustains your opinion with evidence or information that contributes to the discussion of the subject. 0 pts Not Present The student did not participate, nor did he make contributions to his classmates. 4 pts Rúbrica: Foros de Discusión Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbility to Analyze Critically Ratings 4 pts Excellent Analyze in depth the opinions expressed by classmates, managing to identify general ideas, as well as the unsound arguments presented and criticize them constructively. Making contributions based on evidence that can support through literature. 3 pts Very Good It analyzes carefully the opinions that the classmates express and frequently manages to identify the general ideas, as well as the unsound arguments that they present and in almost always criticize them constructively. In most of the occasions it makes contributions to them based on evidences that can sustain through the literature 2 pts Satisfactory It superficially analyzes the opinions expressed by classmates, and rarely identifies general ideas and their main arguments. Sometimes he criticizes them constructively and makes contributions that sustain his choice with literature related to the topic of discussion. Pts 1 pts Deficient It does not analyze the opinions expressed by classmates, nor does it identify general ideas, nor its arguments. It never criticizes constructively the contributions of its peers and does not make contributions that support its choice with literature related to the topic of discussion. 0 pts Not Present The student did not participate, nor did he make contributions to his classmates. 4 pts Rúbrica: Foros de Discusión Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Contributions Ratings 4 pts Excellent It constantly contributes clear and critical ideas that enrich the dialogue with classmates and help them move towards the construction of knowledge based on evidence related to the topic of discussion. 3 pts Very Good It often contributes clear and mostly critical ideas that contribute to enrich the dialogue with classmates. Occasionally, these help to move towards the construction of knowledge based on evidence related to the topic of discussion. 2 pts Satisfactory It brings some ideas but often they are not very clear or critical. Only on some occasions, they contribute to enrich the dialogue with classmates. Rarely sustains its choice with literature related to the topic of discussion. Pts 1 pts Deficient It almost does not make contributions and in general, its ideas are not clear or critical, so that it contributes little or nothing to the dialogue. It does not support its choice with literature related to the topic of discussion. 0 pts Not Present The student did not participate, nor did he make contributions to his classmates. 4 pts Rúbrica: Foros de Discusión Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Nursing Professional Terminology and Language This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInteraction with Participants Ratings 4 pts Excellent In his participation's he expresses his ideas with total clarity and thoroughness, correctly applying the orthographic, grammatical and syntactic rules, as well as, an appropriate nursing professional terminology. 3 pts Very Good In his participation's, he expresses ideas with enough clarity and thoroughness, applying, in most cases, the orthographic, grammatical and syntax rules, correctly, as well as the appropriate nursing professional terminology. 4 pts Excellent It establishes an open dialogue with the classmates and the professor, debating and defending their ideas, and building new contributions together with the participants. Always supported by the literature and knowledge of the nursing discipline. 3 pts Very Good Establish a dialogue with classmates and the professor, contributing in the construction of new ideas, but only occasionally debate opinions about the subject. In most of its contributions, it is based on the literature and knowledge of the nursing discipline. 2 pts Satisfactory In his participation's he does not express ideas very clearly or thoroughly and applies with certain errors, in the use of nursing professional terminology, orthographic, grammatical and syntax rules. 2 pts Satisfactory Establish a minimum dialogue with colleagues and the professor, the contribution in the construction of new ideas is little. Rarely, their contributions are supported by literature and knowledge of the nursing discipline. Pts 1 pts Deficient In his participation is not expressed clearly and his ideas are superficial, writing with multiple errors, in the use of nursing professional terminology, spelling, grammar and syntax rules. 0 pts Not Present The student did not participate, nor did he make contributions to his classmates. 1 pts Deficient Does not establish a dialogue with colleagues and the professor. 0 pts Not Present The student did not participate, nor did he make contributions to his classmates. 4 pts 4 pts Rúbrica: Foros de Discusión Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences Ratings 4 pts Excellent Contributes to discussion with clear, concise comments formatted in an easy to read style that is free of grammatical or spelling errors. No unprofessional comments or behaviors. 4 pts Excellent The student cites in his contribution’s authors of recent references (5 years or less of published) related to the topic of the discussion forum, written according to the latest edition of APA. 3 pts Very Good Contributes valuable information to discussion with minor clarity or mechanics errors. Less than two grammar errors no unprofessional comments or behaviors. 3 pts Satisfactory In most of its contributions, the student cites authors of recent references (5 years or less of published) related to the topic of the discussion forum, written according to the latest edition of APA. 2 pts Satisfactory Communicates in friendly, courteous and helpful manner with some errors in clarity or mechanics. Less than 5 grammar errors, no unprofessional comments or behaviors. 2 pts Satisfactory On rare occasions the student cites authors of recent references (5 years or less of published) related to the topic of the discussion forum, written according to the latest edition of APA. Pts 1 pts Deficient Posts long, unorganized or rude content that may contain multiple errors or may be inappropriate. Unprofessional comment or behavior. 1 pts Deficient The student never cites authors of recent references (5 years or less of published) related to the topic of the discussion forum, written according to the latest edition of APA. 0 pts Not Present The student did not participate, nor did he make contributions to his classmates. 0 pts Not Present The student did not participate, nor did he make contributions to his class 4 pts ...
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

This question has not been answered.

Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!

Similar Questions
Related Tags