wwriting need help please

Nov 6th, 2014
KateS
Category:
Writing
Price: $60 USD

Question description

Final Paper – An Analysis of Community Oriented Policing (COPPS) and Traditional Policing Tactics and Procedures paper is eight to ten pages

The purpose of the Final Paper is to analyze and explain the similarities and differences between traditional policing and COPPS as well as infer the future of police leadership. Within the scope of the paper the student will be required to address the following:

  • Compare and contrast Traditional Policing with COPPS. What is Traditional Policing? What is COPPS? What are the similarities and what are the differences between the two? What is the philosophy of each?
  • Explain the successful leadership traits that are inherent in each and how they overlap. What are leaders looking for from their employees within each style?
  • Identify and describe the leadership and motivational theories applicable to each. Discuss how these theories are applied practically in police work today.
  • Compare how leadership, management, and supervision are different and/or similar in Traditional Policing and COPPS.
  • Choose two modern crime issues and explain how each style of policing would address these issues. Which style is more effective for each issue, and why? Would a combination of styles be more effective? Why?
    Choices for crime issues:
    • Incidences of rape on a college campus
    • Multiple home robberies throughout a middle class neighborhood
    • Gang infighting
    • Drug use/abuse by affluent teenagers
    • Prostitution in a low-income residential neighborhood
    • Vandalism of inner-city schools
    • Possible terrorist activity/cell
    • High speed car races on city streets
    • Juvenile crime
    • Bullying in schools
    • Domestic disputes
    • Natural disasters
    • Major accidents
  • Which style of policing is most practical and effective for today’s world, or would a combination of both work? Explain why.
  • How will both styles need to change and/or be implemented in the future to create successful supervision and leadership of police? 

Writing the Final Paper
The Final Paper:

  • Must be a minimum of eight (8) double-spaced pages in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA (6th ed.) style as outlined in the approved style guide.
  • Must use a minimum of five (s) scholarly resources, two from the Ashford Library.
  • Must provide a cover page that includes:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must address one of the topics found in Final Paper guidelines.
  • Must include an introductory paragraph with a succinct thesis statement.
  • Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph.
  • Must use APA (6th ed.) style as outlined in the approved APA style guide to document all sources.
  • Must include a Reference Page that is completed according to APA (6th ed.) style as outlined in the approved APA style guide.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Description:

Total Possible Score: 25.00

Compares and Contrasts Traditional Policing with Community-Oriented Policing and Problem Solving (COPPS) models

Total: 3.50

Distinguished - Provides a comprehensive compare and contrast of Traditional Policing and the COPPS models. Many relevant and specific examples from each policing model are provided to support the comparison.

Proficient - Provides a compare and contrast of Traditional Policing and the COPPS models. Examples from each policing model are provided to support the comparison, but the compare contrast is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Provides a limited compare and contrast of Traditional Policing and the COPPS models. The comparison is underdeveloped or examples provided minimally support the comparison.

Below Expectations - Attempts to compare and contrast Traditional Policing and the COPPS models; however, the comparison is unevenly balanced, significantly underdeveloped, and/or examples provided do not support the comparison.

Non-Performance - The comparison and contrast of Traditional Policing and the COPPS models is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Explains Leadership Traits that are Inherent in Traditional Policing and COPPS

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Provides a detailed explanation of leadership traits that are inherent in Traditional Policing and COPPS and how traits overlap. The explanation is supported by specific and relevant examples.

Proficient - Provides an explanation of leadership traits that are inherent in Traditional Policing and COPPS and how traits overlap. The explanation is mostly supported by examples.

Basic - Provides a limited explanation of leadership traits that are inherent in Traditional Policing and COPPS and how traits overlap. The explanation is somewhat supported by examples.

Below Expectations - Attempts to provides an explanation of leadership traits that are inherent in Traditional Policing and COPPS; however, the explanation is missing significant details, underdeveloped, and/or is not supported by examples.

Non-Performance - The explanation of leadership traits in Traditional Policing and COPPS is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Identifies and Describes the leadership and motivational theories and Discusses How Theories are Applied

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Identifies and comprehensively describes two leadership and motivational theories applicable to each policing model. Provides a thorough discussion of how theories are applied to police work today.

Proficient - Identifies and describes two leadership and motivational theories in either Traditional Policing or COPPS. Provides a discussion of how theories are applied to police work today. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Identifies and briefly describes two leadership and motivational theories in either Traditional Policing or COPPS. Provides a limited discussion of how theories are applied to police work today. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Identifies and attempts to describe two leadership and motivational theories in either Traditional Policing or COPP and provide a  discussion of how theories are applied; however, the discussion of the theories is unevenly balanced or  significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The identification of leadership and motivational theories applicable to Traditional Policing and COPPS and discussion of how these theories are applied practically in police work today are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Compares Leadership, Management and Supervision in Traditional Policing and COPPS

Total: 3.50

Distinguished - Provides a detailed comparison of leadership, management, and supervision in Traditional Policing and COPPS. The comparison is supported by specific and relevant examples.

Proficient - Provides a comparison of leadership, management, and supervision in Traditional Policing and COPPS. The comparison is supported by relevant examples, but is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Provides a minimal comparison of leadership, management, and supervision in Traditional Policing and COPPS. The comparison is somewhat supported by examples and/or is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to compare the leadership, management, and supervision in Traditional Policing and COPPS; however, the comparison is not supported by examples and/or is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The comparison of leadership, management, and supervision Traditional Policing and COPPS is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Identifies Two Modern Crime Issues and Explains How Each Style of Policing Would Handle These Issues

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Identifies two crime issues and comprehensively explains how each policing model would address the issues. The explanation is supported by specific and relevant examples.

Proficient - Identifies two crime issues and explains how each policing model would address the issues. The explanation is mostly supported by examples.

Basic - Identifies two crime issues and minimally explains how each policing model would address the issues. The explanation is somewhat supported by examples.

Below Expectations - Identifies two crime issues and attempts to explain how each policing model would address the issues; however, the explanation is not sufficiently supported by examples.

Non-Performance - The identification of two modern crime issues and explanation of how each policing style would address the identified issues are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Explains Which Policing Style is More Practical and Effective for Today’s World

Total: 3.50

Distinguished - Thoroughly explains which policing style is more effective or if a combination of styles is most practical and effective for today’s world. The explanation is supported by specific and relevant details.

Proficient - Mostly explains which policing style is more effective or if a combination of styles is most practical and effective for today’s world. The explanation is supported by relevant details.

Basic - Minimally explains which policing style is more effective or if a combination of styles is most practical and effective for today’s world. The explanation is somewhat supported by details.

Below Expectations - Attempts to explain which policing style is more effective or if a combination of styles is most practical and effective for today’s world; however, the explanation is not sufficiently supported by details.

Non-Performance - The explanation of which style of policing is more practical and effective for today’s world is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Describes How Both Style s Need to Change and/or be Implemented in the Future to Create Successful Supervision

Total: 1.50

Distinguished - Thoroughly describes how both policing styles need to change and/or be implemented in the future to create successful supervision.

Proficient - Describes how both policing styles need to change and/or be implemented in the future to create successful supervision. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally describes how both policing styles need to change and/or be implemented in the future to create successful supervision. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to describe how both policing styles need to change and/or be implemented in the future to create successful supervision; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The description of how both policing styles need to change and/or be implemented in the future is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Reading: Relationship to Text

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Analyzes texts for scholarly significance and pertinence within and across the various disciplines, assessing them according to their contributions and consequences.

Proficient - Utilizes texts in the context of scholarship to expand a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and to raise and discover significant inquiries.

Basic - Employs texts with the intent and expectation of increasing knowledge.

Below Expectations - Approaches texts only within the context of assignment.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Context and Purpose for Writing

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Proficient - Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.

Basic - Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident, but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Below Expectations - Organization and presentation of content is extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

APA Formatting

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.

Basic - Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Page Requirement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.

Proficient - The paper closely meets the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.

Basic - The paper meets over half of the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.

Below Expectations - A fraction of the page requirement is completed.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Source Requirement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
(997)
School: UCLA
PREMIUM TUTOR

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

8 Reviews


Summary
Quality
Communication
On Time
Value
Five Star Tutor
Dec 6th, 2016
" Outstanding Job!!!! "
SjSurvivor143
Nov 21st, 2016
" Thanks for the help. "
Joemoe
Nov 8th, 2016
" <3 it, thanks for saving me time. "
tinytim47
Oct 30th, 2016
" Wow this is really good.... didn't expect it. Sweet!!!! "
pmallory
Oct 25th, 2016
" Totally impressed with results!! :-) "
mixedballz
Oct 16th, 2016
" excellent work as always thanks for the help "
kiln82
Oct 3rd, 2016
" awesome work thanks "
darnay
Sep 24th, 2016
" The best tutor out there!!!! "
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1823 tutors are online

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors