PMJ 3301 Colorado State Global Module 6 Quality Methodologies Comparison Essay

User Generated

Qveglq1000

Engineering

PMJ 3301

Colorado State University Global Campus

PMJ

Description

Option #2: Quality Methodologies Comparison

Some of the more common quality and improvement methodologies and standards include Lean, Six Sigma, total quality management (TQM), and ISO 9000.

For this assignment, summarize each of the methodologies and standards and then compare and contrast all of these methodologies and standards through an analysis of the following questions:

  • What are some of the common tools or techniques for each methodology?
  • What types of industries would be a good fit for each of these methodologies?
  • Based on these methodologies, which do you think is the easiest to pair with project management or total quality management programs within an organization for continuous improvement?

Your 2-to-3-page paper must be well written, follow the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.) for writing and style, and have at least two outside references (in addition to your textbook). Be sure to properly organize your writing and include an introduction, headings / subheadings for the body of your work, analysis and recommendations, conclusion, and list of references. APA 7 Format

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached. Please let me know if you have any questions or need revisions.

: QUALITY METHODOLOGIES
COMPARISON
by HAL Lab

Submission date: 18-Jan-2021 04:08PM (UTC-0500)
Submission ID: 1489700509
File name: OPTION_2_QUALITY_METHODOLOGIES_COMPARISON.docx (21.22K)
Word count: 1117
Character count: 6107

: QUALITY METHODOLOGIES COMPARISON
ORIGINALITY REPORT

8

%

SIMILARITY INDEX

7%

0%

6%

INTERNET SOURCES

PUBLICATIONS

STUDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

1

Submitted to Colorado State University, Global
Campus

5%

Student Paper

2
3
4

2%

www.coursehero.com
Internet Source

1%

bullmed.ch
Internet Source

1%

www.businessperspectives.org
Internet Source

Exclude quotes

Off

Exclude bibliography

On

Exclude matches

Off


Running Head: OPTION #2: QUALITY METHODOLOGIES COMPARISON

Option #2: Quality Methodologies Comparison
Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
Date:

1

OPTION #2: QUALITY METHODOLOGIES COMPARISON

2

Table of Contents
Option #2: Quality Methodologies Comparison ...................................................................................... 3
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 3
Comparisons ................................................................................................................................................ 3
Lean .............................................................................................................................................................. 3
Six Sigma ..................................................................................................................................................... 4
Total quality management ......................................................................................................................... 5
ISO 9000...........

Related Tags