SIM 422 American Sentinel Evaluating a Quantitative Research Design Discussion
Activity 2Evaluating a Quantitative Research Study Examine the study- Harris, M. F., Chan, B. C., Laws, R. A., Williams, A. M., Davies, G. P., Jayasinghe, U. W., … Milat, A. (2013). The impact of a brief lifestyle intervention delivered by generalist community nurses (CN SNAP trial). BMC Public Health, 13(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-375In this assessment, you will evaluate the study according to research design methods, procedures and study results, for example, see Evaluating a Quantitative Study LoBiondo-Wood,& Haber (2018).Suggested ReadingChapter 7 & 8 LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2018). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice.(9th ed) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.Astroth, K. S., & Chung, S. Y. (2018). Focusing on the fundamentals: Reading quantitative research with a critical eye. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 45(3), 283-287. Retrieved from http://americansentinel.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.americansentinel.idm.oclc.org/docview/2063390700?accountid=169658Additional Instructions:All submissions should have a title page and reference page.Utilize a minimum of two scholarly resources.Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria.Adhere to APA compliance guidelines.Adhere to the chosen Submission Option for Delivery of Activity guidelines.Submission Options:Choose One:Instructions:Paper4 to 6-page paper. Include title and reference pages.Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation8 to 10 slides. Add title and reference slides.Follow Rules of 7.Other media (Prezi, etc.) presentation8 to 10 slides with speaker notes. Add title and reference slides.Follow Rules of 7.Video Presentation5 to 8-minute video presentation.Attach reference page or include in video.Professional appearance and background.Video submissions must include a script in Word format, submitted through Turnitin for an Originality Report.TableTable with appropriate columns and headers.Include title and reference pages.Graphs or other illustrationsGraphs or illustrations with appropriate labels. Include title and reference pages.PosterPoster utilizing any applicable poster template. Include visual graphics/images/other formats for visual appeal. Include appropriate title and references on poster.Note: Title and reference pages/slides do not count towards the count requirements. Evidenced-Based Practice- Evaluating a Quantitative Research StudyDescription: The baccalaureate graduate nurse will demonstrate an understanding of the basic elements of the research process and models for applying evidence to clinical practice.Course Competencies: 1) Examine the relationships among theory, practice, and research. 2) Interpret research findings using the elements of the research process. 3) Differentiate between ethical and legal precepts that guide research conduct and protect human subjects. 4) Integrate reliable evidence from multiple ways of knowing, to inform practice and make clinical judgments. 5) Evaluate data from relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery of care to culturally and ethnically diverse populations. 6) Collaborate with health team members to collect, interpret, synthesize and disseminate evidence to improve patient outcomes in complex health care environments.QSEN Competency: 3) Evidence-Based Practice BSN Essential IIIAreaGold MasterySilver ProficientBronze AcceptableAcceptable Mastery not DemonstratedEvaluatesresearch designof study using allof thecomponents ofthe evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluatesmethods/procedure, and results ofthe study usingall of thecomponents ofthe evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Discusses the importance of research, how the study contributes to EBP and applicability of the specific study to clinical Practice in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018)Evaluatesresearch designof study using allof thecomponents ofthe evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluatesmethods/procedure, and results ofthe study usingall of thecomponents ofthe evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Discusses the importance of research, how the study contributes to EBP and applicability of the specific study to clinical Practice in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018)Evaluatesresearch designof study using(75%)components ofthe evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluatesmethods/procedures and results ofthe study using(75%)components ofthe evaluation inLoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Discusses the importance of research and how the study may contribute to EBP in general but not how the specific study contributes tocurrent clinical Practice in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018).Evaluates research design of study using some (50% or less) components of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018).Evaluates methods/procedu res and results of the study using some (50% or less) components of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Provides simple definitions of research and evidence but does not delve into the relationship among research, evidence-basedpractice and improvingPractice in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018)Does not address sectionDoes not address sectionDoes not address section APA, Grammar, Spelling, and PunctuationNo errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.One to three errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.Four to six errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.Seven or more errors in APA, Spelling, and Punctuation.ReferencesProvides two or more references.Provides two references.Provides one references.Provides no references.