Course Code NRS-429VN Class Code NRS-429VN-IO1272 Criteria Content Percentage 100.0% Approved Topic, Associated Population and Health Disparity 10.0% Evidence-Based Approaches to Optimize Health for Population 10.0% Proposal for Health Education for FamilyCentered Health Promotion 10.0% Resources and Organizations for Proposed Education Plan 5.0% Interdisciplinary Health Professional Involvement 5.0% Presentation of Content 40.0% Layout 5.0% Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title CLC - Health Promotion and Community Resource Teaching Project Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Topic and associated population selected is not approved; topic and associated population are not relevant to the scope of the assignment. Topic and associated population are omitted. Evidence-based approaches to optimize health for this population are not presented. A proposal for health education for a family-centered health promotion to address the issue for the target population is omitted. The proposal is not supported by evidence-based practice. Resources and organizations to support the proposed education plan are omitted. Interdisciplinary health professionals important to the health promotion are not included. The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Sources are not documented. Total Points 160.0 Less than Satisfactory (75.00%) Approved topic and associated population are partially presented. It is unclear how the topic adversely affects the selected population. Health disparities are partially described, or are not relevant to selected population. There are significant inaccuracies. Evidence-based approaches to optimize health for this population are partially presented; some approaches presented are not evidence-based, or are not relevant for this population. Explanation of how these approaches minimize health disparity is incomplete, or are not relevant for the affected population. There are significant inaccuracies. A proposal for health education for a family-centered health promotion to address the issue for the target population is partially presented. The proposal is not entirely relevant to the target population. The proposal requires more support relevant to evidence-based practice. There are significant inaccuracies. One health-related organization for the selected topic is presented. The profile is incomplete, or it is unclear how the organization is relevant to the focus topic. Two resources (national or local) are presented. It is unclear how the resources are supposed to be used, or how the resources are relevant to the focus topic. At least one significant interdisciplinary health professional is presented. It is unclear how the professional important to the health promotion, and what the role of the professional would be. Support for the suggested member is needed. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (79.00%) Approved topic and associated population are summarized. A general correlation of how the topic adversely affects the selected population is presented. Relevant health disparities are summarized. There are some inaccuracies. More evidence or rationale is needed for support. Evidence-based approaches to optimize health for this population are summarized; it is unclear how some approaches presented are relevant for this population. A general explanation of how these approaches minimize health disparity is presented. There are some inaccuracies. More evidence or rationale is needed for support. A proposal for health education for a family-centered health promotion to address the issue for the target population is presented. It is generally supported by evidence-based practice; there are some inaccuracies, or some areas need more support using evidence-based practice. Overall, the proposal is relevant to the target population. A general profile for a health-related organization relevant to the selected topic is summarized. Two relevant resources (national or local) are presented, and there is a general explanation for how the resources are supposed to be used by the patient or provider. Some significant interdisciplinary health professionals are presented. A summary of their role and importance to the health promotion is provided. Some support for the suggested members is needed. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (89.00%) Approved topic and associated population are described. A correlation of how the topic adversely affects the selected population is established and discussed. Relevant health disparities are discussed. There are minor inaccuracies. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support. Evidence-based approaches to optimize health for this population are discussed. Explanation of how these approaches minimize health disparity is presented. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support. A proposal for health education for a family-centered health promotion to address the issue for the target population is presented. It is supported by evidence-based practice and relevant to the target population. There are minor inaccuracies. A general profile for a health-related organization relevant to the selected topic is presented. Two relevant resources (national or local) are presented, and there is an explanation for how the resources are supposed to be used by the patient or provider. Key interdisciplinary health professionals are presented A discussion of their role and importance to the health promotion is provided. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) Comments Approved topic and associated population are thoroughly described. A strong correlation of how the topic adversely affects the selected population is established and discussed in detail. Relevant health disparities are clearly presented and discussed. Strong evidence and compelling rationale is offered for support. Evidence-based approaches to optimize health for this population are discussed, and approaches are accurately represented and highly relevant to the population. Explanation of how these approaches minimize health disparity is well-developed. Strong evidence and rationale are provided throughout. An understanding of the importance of A well-developed proposal for health education for a familycentered health promotion to address the issue for the target population is presented. It is strongly supported by evidencebased practice and highly relevant to the target population. The ability to apply evidence-based practice to health education for a target population is clearly demonstrated. A general profile for a health-related organization relevant to the selected topic is well presented. Two relevant resources (national or local) are presented, and there is a clear explanation for how the resources are supposed to be used by the patient or provider. All significant interdisciplinary health professionals are presented. A clear discussion of their role and importance to the health promotion is provided. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned Interdisciplinary health professionals • Primary care physician • Podiatrist • Dietician • Ophthalmologist Endocrinologist • Nephrologist • Nurse Primary care physician, dietician and podiatrist role Primary care doctor, monitor diabetes symptoms, perform regular checkups, blood test, prescribe medication and refer a specialist to help monitor your treatment. Dietician help provide right diet to help control your blood sugar to stay healthy. Podiatrist monitor your feet for any serious infections that could lead to gangrene and amputation. Nurses assist the doctors ,take orders and help teach the client how to regularly check their blood sugar and how to safely take care and manage the disease. • Ophthalmologist check for potentially serious eye conditions such as cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy • Endocrinologist specialist who diagnoses, treats, and manages pancreatic diseases and help client bring their blood glucose levels under control. • Nephrologist manage kidney disease, also administer human dialysis treatment for proper kidney functioning .
Purchase answer to see full attachment