Description
This week’s discussion is about Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), focusing on the brief case study TOMS Puts Its Right Foot Forward, (p. 102). internationa management cultural, strategy, and behavior. Fred luthans tenth edition.
As a leader, Blake Mycoskie’s decision to make the “One for One” philosophy the central tenet for his organization brings Corporate Social Responsibility to the forefront of the company.
Thinking about the goals of the case, if you were to start a company with the “One for One” philosophy, as a leader, what decisions would you make to combine commercial objectives with social goals to improve the impact of corporate social responsibility efforts? How might the two conflict?
Embed course material concepts, principles, and theories, which require supporting citations along with two scholarly peer-reviewed references supporting your answer.
Explanation & Answer
Attached. Please let me know if you have any questions or need revisions.
1
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Name
Institution
Course
Instructor
Date
2
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) enables organizations to be accountable for their
business and stakeholders at the same time, creating a positive impact on society and the
economy. TOMS company used the "One for One" philosophy to build a Corporate Social
Responsibility, allowing it to serve the community and grow its business. Through the "One for
One" philosophy, Mycoskie built a for-profit organization that focused on alleviating poverty in
the community. This strategy allowed it to be accountable for its business as well as the
community it served. Therefore, organizations that wish to adopt the "One for One" philosophy
should make appropriate decisions to combine commercial objectives and social goals to
strengthen corporate social responsibility.
Suppose an organization combines commerc...
Review
Review
