Science Question

Science

NR 449

Broward Community College

Question Description

I need a 3 pages paper in APA format, follow the first paper with the same articles. I need a discussion post related to the paper. Please read everything and follow the guidelines. I need the discussion post on Tuesday, please.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

So, the paper is related to this TOPIC: NURSE BURNOUT DURING A PANDEMIC The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic. So, follow this clinical problem to do the paper: CLINICAL PROBLEM OF INTEREST FOR THE TOPIC IS. How nurses burnout during this pandemic? This paper is related to the word and the articles I sent please go over them before you start the paper. Also, I sent the guidelines for the paper which is a pdf link please follow every step in the guidelines. Question related to the paper you only answer this question after the paper is done writing. Give one example of a data collection method used in one of the studies identified in your Week 5 project. What variable was this method used to measure? AS WE ALREADY KNOW THE PROJECT IS NURSE BURNOUT DURING A PANDEMIC SO THE PURPOSE OF WEEK 5 PAPER IS TO INTEPRET THE TWO ARTICLES IDENTIFIED AS MOST IMPORTANT TO THE TOPIC. Please follow the guidelines and the papers I sent. This part is a discussion paper, I need it on Tuesday. The Analyzing Published Research paper is the second of three related assignments in this course. It is due in Week 5. The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic. Researchers depend on valid data to be able to draw conclusions that may impact clinical practice. To do so, they need to select an appropriate measurement strategy that will have minimal potential for error. Results are more valid and credible if the measurement error is reduced. Without accurate and consistent data, the researchers may come to the wrong conclusion (Houser, 2018). Give one example of a data collection method used in one of the studies identified in your Unit 5 project. What variable was this method used to measure? NR449 Evidence-Based Practice RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines Purpose The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic. Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes. CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8) CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs 4 and 8) Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment. Total points possible: 200 points Preparing the assignment 1. Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions. 2. Please make sure you do not duplicate articles within your group. 3. The paper will include the following: a. Clinical Question (30 points/15%) 1. Describe the problem: What is the focus of your group’s work? 2. Significance of problem: What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations. 3. Purpose of the paper: What will your paper do or describe? ***Please note that although most of these questions are the same as you addressed in paper 1, the purpose of this paper is different. You can use your paper 1 for items 1 & 2 above, including any faculty suggestions for improvement provided as feedback. b. Evidence Matrix Table: Data Summary (Appendix A) - (60 points/30%) Categorize items in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article. 1. References (recent publication within the last 5 years) 2. Purpose/Hypothesis/Study Question(s) 3. Variables: Independent (I) and Dependent (D) 4. Study Design 5. Sample Size and Selection 6. Data Collection Methods 7. Major Findings (Evidence) c. Description of Findings (60 points/30%) Describe the data in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article. 1. Compare and contrast variables within each study. 2. What are the study design and procedures used in each study; qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method study, levels of confidence in each study, etc.? 3. Participant demographics and information. 4. Instruments used, including reliability and validity. 5. How do the research findings provide evidence to support your clinical problem, or what further evidence is needed to answer your question? 6. Next steps: Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work. d. Conclusion (20 points/10%) Review major findings in a summary paragraph. 1. Evidence to address your clinical problem. 2. Make a connection back to all the included sections. NR449_RUA_Analyzing_Published_Research_Guidelines_Sept20_v2 1 NR449 Evidence-Based Practice RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines 3. Wrap up the assignment and give the reader something to think about. e. Format (30 points/15%) 1. Correct grammar and spelling 2. Include a title and reference page 3. Use of headings for each section: o Problem o Synthesis of the Literature − Variables − Methods − Participants − Instruments − Implications for Future Work 4. Conclusion 5. Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines 6. Include at least two (2) scholarly, current (within 5 years) primary sources other than the textbook 7. 3-4 pages in length, excluding appendices, title and reference pages For writing assistance (APA, formatting, or grammar) visit the APA Citation and Writing page in the online library. Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned. 2 NR449_RUA_Analyzing_Published_Research_Guidelines_Sept20_v2 2 NR449 Evidence-Based Practice RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment. Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available) Clinical Question (30 points/15%) 1. 2. 3. Required criteria Describe the problem: What is the focus of your group’s work? Significance of problem: What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations. Purpose of the paper: What will your paper do or describe? Evidence Matrix Table: Data Summary (Appendix A) (60 points/30%) Highest Level of Performance High Level of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present in paper 30 points 26 points 24 points 11 points 0 points Includes 3 Includes 2 Includes 1 requirements for requirements for requirement for section. section. section. 60 points 56 points 47 points Present, yet includes no required criteria. 25 points No requirements for this section presented. 0 points Required criteria Includes 7 Includes 6 Includes 5 Includes 4 or less No requirements Categorize items in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and requirements for requirements for requirements for requirements for for this section reference list entries for each article. section. section. section. presented. section. 1. References (recent publication within the last 5 years) 2. Purpose/Hypothesis/Study Question(s) 3. Variables: Independent (I) and Dependent (D) 4. Study Design 5. Sample Size and Selection 6. Data Collection Methods 7. Major Findings (Evidence) Description of Findings (60 points/30%) 60 points 53 points 47 points 23 points 0 points Required criteria Includes 6 Includes 5 Includes 4 Includes 3 or less No requirements Describe the data in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations requirements for requirements for requirements for requirements for for this section and reference list entries for each article. section. section. section. section. presented. 1. Compare and contrast variables within each study. 2. What are the study design and procedures used in each study; qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method study, levels of confidence in each study, etc.? 3. Participant demographics and information. NR449_RUA_Analyzing_Published_Research_Guidelines_Sept20_v2 3 NR449 Evidence-Based Practice RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available) 4. 5. 6. Required criteria Review major findings in a summary paragraph. 1. Evidence to address your clinical problem. 2. Make a connection back to all the included sections. 3. Wrap up the assignment and give the reader something to think about. Format (30 points/15%) 4. 5. 6. 7. High Level of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present in paper 20 points 18 points 15 points 8 points 0 points Present, yet includes no required criteria. No requirements for this section presented. Instruments used, including reliability and validity. How do the research findings provide evidence to support your clinical problem, or what further evidence is needed to answer your question? Next steps: Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work. Conclusion (20 points/10%) 1. 2. 3. Highest Level of Performance Includes 3 Includes 2 Includes 1 requirements for requirements for requirement for section. section. section. 30 points Required criteria Correct grammar and spelling Include a title and reference page Use of headings for each section: o Problem o Synthesis of the Literature ▪ Variables ▪ Methods ▪ Participants ▪ Instruments ▪ Implications for Future Work Conclusion Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines Includes at least two (2) scholarly, current (within 5 years) primary sources other than the textbook 3-4 pages in length excluding appendices, title and reference pages 26 points 23 points 11 points 0 points Includes 8 Includes 7 Includes 6 Includes 5 or less No requirements requirements for requirements for requirements for requirements for for this section section. section. section. section. presented. Total Points Possible = 200 points NR449_RUA_Analyzing_Published_Research_Guidelines_Sept20_v2 4 NR449 Evidence-Based Practice RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines Appendix A EVIDENCE MATRIX TABLE Article References 1 (SAMPLE ARTICLE) Smith, L. (2013). What should I eat? A focus for those living with diabetes. Journal of Nursing Education, 1(4), 111-112. Purpose Hypothesis Study Question(s) How do educational support groups effect dietary modifications in patients with diabetes? Variables Independent(I) Dependent(D) D-Dietary modifications I-Education Study Design Quantitative Sample Size & Selection Data Collection Methods N- 18 Convenience sample-selected from local support group in Pittsburgh, PA Focus Groups Major Finding(s) Support and education improved compliance with dietary modifications. 1 2 3 4 5 NR449_RUA_Analyzing_Published_Research_Guidelines_Sept20_v2 5 ...
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

This question has not been answered.

Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!

Similar Questions
Related Tags