Description
1st deal.. regarding the legalization of cannabis for recreational purposes in the states of Washington and Colorado. It also contains a question regarding the potential impact that such legalization may have on employers' substance abuse policies.
discuss issues that may be raised in employment law and substance abuse policies with respect to the legalization of recreation and medical cannabis.
Add other topics like including contracts, protections against discrimination, regulatory oversight of business, or any other topic that you feel might apply to the questions asked.2nd deal..
PowerPoint presentation (or other presentation format of your choice) that discusses the specific legal and practical bases for your argument in support or opposition to the merger.
Consult these articles and feel free to conduct your own research as well:
- The Rising Monopoly of Monsanto-Bayer
- The $66 Billion Bayer-Monsanto Merger Just Got a Green Light—but Farmers Are Terrified
- Pros and Cons of Mergers
Explanation & Answer
Here you go
Bayer-Monsanto merger
Student’s Name
Course name
Professors name
Institutional Affiliation
Date
Practical basis
• I oppose the merger because:
• The merger will continue in the production of toxic.
• There will be a bigger merger of two companies that looks at
increasing crop yields using cancerous chemicals without regard to
human health (Galambos et al., 2007).
• It crashes the small-scale farmers by forcing them to purchase farm
products from the newly merged company.
• The environment will be affected through the use of agrochemicals
(Jayaraman et al., 2020).
• The merger will also be a threat to our climate due to the increase of
industrial agriculture which heavily relies on fossil fuel.
Legal basis
• On a legal basis, the merger is illegal under the antitrust laws in the
•
•
•
•
•
European Union and the united states.
Antitrust laws protect customers from predatory corporate practices.
In a free-market economy, there should be fair competition but the BayerMonsanto merger goes against these rules (Treviño & Nelson, 2021).
The enforcers in the US and the EU strive to avoid mergers which would
potentially undermine consumers by dramatically enhancing firms' market
power, and taking advantage of competition.
Antitrust laws deal with a variety of dubious business practices, not limited
to bid-rigging, market distribution, pricing, and monopolies.
Under EU competition regulations, the proposed merger between Bayer
and Monsanto must be stopped, as it restricts competition: it concentrates
an already very tightly bundled agriculture sector even more.
References.
• References
• Galambos, L., Hikino, T., & Zamagni, V. (2007). The global
chemical industry in the age of the petrochemical revolution. Cambridge
[etc.: Cambridge University Press.
• Jayaraman, S., De, M. K., & Nestle, M. (2020). Bite back: People
taking on corporate food and winning.
University of California Press.
Oakland, California:
• Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2021). Managing business ethics:
Straight talk about how to do it right. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
The 2nd deal,paper format
Running head: BAYER MONSANTO MERGER
Bayer Monsanto merger
Student’s name
Course name
Professor’s name
University affiliation
Date
1
2
BAYER MONSANTO MERGER
Bayer Monsanto merger
On a practical basis, the merger will continue in the production of toxic agrochemicals
that are not good for people. There are ...
Review
Review
