Description
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
Really helped me to better understand my coursework. Super recommended.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
45 questions about the course: "Successful Negotiation: Essential Strategies and Skills"
Hi, there are 45 questions I need answers please, about the course:Successful Negotiation: Essential Strategies and Skills ...
45 questions about the course: "Successful Negotiation: Essential Strategies and Skills"
Hi, there are 45 questions I need answers please, about the course:Successful Negotiation: Essential Strategies and Skillsby University of Michiganwhich can be found on Coursera.
8 pages
Detailed Agenda For Kaizen Or Work
The human resource department head will assign a code for review that it is matched to an appraiser who will spearhead the ...
Detailed Agenda For Kaizen Or Work
The human resource department head will assign a code for review that it is matched to an appraiser who will spearhead the processes and associated ...
5 pages
Assignment 2 Article Critique
Why did the authors select binary logistic regression in the research? Usually, the binary logistic regression is applied ...
Assignment 2 Article Critique
Why did the authors select binary logistic regression in the research? Usually, the binary logistic regression is applied when an analyst seeks to ...
Introduction: As healthcare administrators, there are a number of legal and ethical issues that may need your consideration. Review the following case study and address the questions that follow: From 1930 to 1960, about 5,000 patients at Michael Reese Ho
Introduction: As healthcare administrators, there are a number of legal and ethical issues that may need your considerati ...
Introduction: As healthcare administrators, there are a number of legal and ethical issues that may need your consideration. Review the following case study and address the questions that follow: From 1930 to 1960, about 5,000 patients at Michael Reese Ho
Introduction: As healthcare administrators, there are a number of legal and ethical issues that may need your consideration. Review the following case study and address the questions that follow: From 1930 to 1960, about 5,000 patients at Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center, located in Chicago, Illinois, were treated with x-ray therapy for some benign conditions of the head and neck. Among them was Joel Blaz, now a citizen of Florida, who received this treatment for infected tonsils and adenoids while he was a child in Illinois from 1947 through 1948. He has suffered various tumors, which he now attributes to this treatment. Blaz was diagnosed with a neural tumor in 1987. In 1974, Michael Reese set up the Thyroid Follow-Up Project to gather data and conduct research among the people who had been subjected to the x-ray therapy. In 1975, the program notified Blaz by e-mail that he was at increased risk of developing thyroid tumors because of the treatment. In 1976, someone associated with the program gave him similar information on a phone call and invited him to return to Michael Reese for evaluation and treatment at his own expense, which he declined to do. Dr. Arthur Schneider was placed in charge of the program in 1977. In 1979, Schneider and Michael Reese submitted a research proposal to the National Institutes of Health stating that a study based on the program showed “strong evidence” of a connection between x-ray treatments of the sort administered to Blaz and various sorts of tumors: thyroid, neural, and others. In 1981, Blaz received but did not complete or return a questionnaire attached to a letter from Schneider in connection with the program. The letter stated that the purpose of the questionnaire was to “investigate the long-term health implications” of childhood radiation treatments and to “determine the possible associated risks.” It did not say anything about “strong evidence” of a connection between the treatments and any tumors. In 1996, after developing neural tumors, Blaz sued Michael Reese’s successor, Galen Hospital in Illinois, and Dr. Schneider, alleging, among other things, that they failed to notify and warn him of their findings and that he might be at a greater risk of neural tumors in a way that might have permitted their earlier detection and removal or other treatment. There is a clear duty to warn the subject of previously administered radiation treatments when there is a strong connection between those treatments and certain kinds of tumors. The harm alleged, neural and other tumors would here be reasonably foreseeable as a likely consequence of the failure to warn and was in fact foreseen by Schneider. A reasonable physician, indeed any reasonable person, could foresee that if someone was warned of “strong evidence” of a connection between treatments to which he or she had been subjected and tumors, he or she would probably seek diagnosis or treatment and perhaps avoid these tumors, and if he or she was not warned, then he or she probably would not seek diagnosis or treatment, increasing the likelihood that he or she would suffer from such tumors. Other things being equal, therefore, a reasonable physician would warn the subject of the treatments. Tasks: Discuss the preventative measures that should be taken to prevent recurrence of such cases. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format. Your initial posting should be addressed at 300–500 words. Submit your document to this Discussion Area by the due date assigned. Be sure to cite your sources using APA format.
RE: SOCW6311 - Assignment: Drafting a Process Evaluation(wk9)
Due 04/25/2019The steps for process evaluation outlined by Bliss and Emshoff (2002) may seem very similar to those for con ...
RE: SOCW6311 - Assignment: Drafting a Process Evaluation(wk9)
Due 04/25/2019The steps for process evaluation outlined by Bliss and Emshoff (2002) may seem very similar to those for conducting other types of evaluation that you have learned about in this course; in fact, it is the purpose and timing of a process evaluation that most distinguish it from other types of evaluation. A process evaluation is conducted during the implementation of the program to evaluate whether the program has been implemented as intended and how the delivery of a program can be improved. A process evaluation can also be useful in supporting an outcome evaluation by helping to determine the reason behind program outcomes.There are several reasons for conducting process evaluation throughout the implementation of a program. Chief among them is to compare the program that is being delivered to the original program plan, in order to identify gaps and make improvements. Therefore, documentation from the planning stage may prove useful when planning a process evaluation.For this Assignment, you either build on the work that you completed in Weeks 6, 7, and 8 related to a support group for caregivers, or on your knowledge about a program with which you are familiar. Review the resource “Workbook for Designing a Process Evaluation”.Submit a 4- to 5-page plan for a process evaluation. Include the following minimal information: Please us 2 other APA peer-reviwed references)A description of the key program elementsA description of the strategies that the program uses to produce changeA description of the needs of the target populationAn explanation of why a process evaluation is important for the programA plan for building relationships with the staff and management7-8 Broad questions to be answered by the process evaluation7-8 Specific questions to be answered by the process evaluationA plan for gathering and analyzing the informationReferencesBliss, M.J., &Emshoff, J.G. (2002) Workbook for designing a process evaluation. Retrieved from http://beta.roadsafetyevaluation.com/evaluationguides/info/workbook-for-designing-a-process-evaluation.pdfMan-Son-Hing, M., Laupacis, A., O’Rourke, K., Molnar, F. J., Mahon, J., Chan, K. B., & Wells, G. (2002). Determination of the clinical importance of study results. Journal of general internal medicine, 17(6), 469–476.
"Musical Artist" written assignment?
Choose a musical artist (from any music era) and provide a 1-2 page summary of the background or history of the artist. Ne ...
"Musical Artist" written assignment?
Choose a musical artist (from any music era) and provide a 1-2 page summary of the background or history of the artist. Next, pick one of his or her main works (songs or compositions) and explain:The meaningThe musical elementsThe contribution that this piece has had to the development of musicIf possible, find a way to listen to the piece so that you can comment on your reaction to the work.Thank you!
Similar Content
BIMD 250 University of Washington Website Analysis and Redesign Thesis Paper
You've been hired to redesign the website and create the concept for a mobile app for UW Bothell. As part of this, conside...
New Bulgarian University Definition of Ideology Essay
Essay:What is ideology? What is your ideology?...
What is the relation of justice to the moral view that Thoreau maintains?
What is the relation of justice to the moral view that Thoreau maintains?...
Cal State San Marcos Data Collection Methods Questionnaires Discussion
Write a brief description on which method(s) you are choosing for your research proposal and why that is the method of cho...
EUD 499 Ashford University Week 5 Program Learning Outcome Discussion 2
EDU 499 Week 5 Discussion 2
Program and Course Reflection
Program Learning Outcomes
PLO1: Include the text of the program ...
How many engines (EOQ) should Harley load onto each truck in order to minimize annual truck transportation and cycle inventory holding cost
Harley Davidson Motorcycle Company is considering purchasing
engines from a supplier in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Engines w...
Anatomy And Physiology Questions.edited
If a patient’s hand is badly infected, why do you think it might be a good idea to immobilize...
Stokeholders Equity
From the year 2013 there has been gradual improvements in the use of technology and techniques to minimize costs. The uses...
can_one_really_survive_without_a_s...
...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
45 questions about the course: "Successful Negotiation: Essential Strategies and Skills"
Hi, there are 45 questions I need answers please, about the course:Successful Negotiation: Essential Strategies and Skills ...
45 questions about the course: "Successful Negotiation: Essential Strategies and Skills"
Hi, there are 45 questions I need answers please, about the course:Successful Negotiation: Essential Strategies and Skillsby University of Michiganwhich can be found on Coursera.
8 pages
Detailed Agenda For Kaizen Or Work
The human resource department head will assign a code for review that it is matched to an appraiser who will spearhead the ...
Detailed Agenda For Kaizen Or Work
The human resource department head will assign a code for review that it is matched to an appraiser who will spearhead the processes and associated ...
5 pages
Assignment 2 Article Critique
Why did the authors select binary logistic regression in the research? Usually, the binary logistic regression is applied ...
Assignment 2 Article Critique
Why did the authors select binary logistic regression in the research? Usually, the binary logistic regression is applied when an analyst seeks to ...
Introduction: As healthcare administrators, there are a number of legal and ethical issues that may need your consideration. Review the following case study and address the questions that follow: From 1930 to 1960, about 5,000 patients at Michael Reese Ho
Introduction: As healthcare administrators, there are a number of legal and ethical issues that may need your considerati ...
Introduction: As healthcare administrators, there are a number of legal and ethical issues that may need your consideration. Review the following case study and address the questions that follow: From 1930 to 1960, about 5,000 patients at Michael Reese Ho
Introduction: As healthcare administrators, there are a number of legal and ethical issues that may need your consideration. Review the following case study and address the questions that follow: From 1930 to 1960, about 5,000 patients at Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center, located in Chicago, Illinois, were treated with x-ray therapy for some benign conditions of the head and neck. Among them was Joel Blaz, now a citizen of Florida, who received this treatment for infected tonsils and adenoids while he was a child in Illinois from 1947 through 1948. He has suffered various tumors, which he now attributes to this treatment. Blaz was diagnosed with a neural tumor in 1987. In 1974, Michael Reese set up the Thyroid Follow-Up Project to gather data and conduct research among the people who had been subjected to the x-ray therapy. In 1975, the program notified Blaz by e-mail that he was at increased risk of developing thyroid tumors because of the treatment. In 1976, someone associated with the program gave him similar information on a phone call and invited him to return to Michael Reese for evaluation and treatment at his own expense, which he declined to do. Dr. Arthur Schneider was placed in charge of the program in 1977. In 1979, Schneider and Michael Reese submitted a research proposal to the National Institutes of Health stating that a study based on the program showed “strong evidence” of a connection between x-ray treatments of the sort administered to Blaz and various sorts of tumors: thyroid, neural, and others. In 1981, Blaz received but did not complete or return a questionnaire attached to a letter from Schneider in connection with the program. The letter stated that the purpose of the questionnaire was to “investigate the long-term health implications” of childhood radiation treatments and to “determine the possible associated risks.” It did not say anything about “strong evidence” of a connection between the treatments and any tumors. In 1996, after developing neural tumors, Blaz sued Michael Reese’s successor, Galen Hospital in Illinois, and Dr. Schneider, alleging, among other things, that they failed to notify and warn him of their findings and that he might be at a greater risk of neural tumors in a way that might have permitted their earlier detection and removal or other treatment. There is a clear duty to warn the subject of previously administered radiation treatments when there is a strong connection between those treatments and certain kinds of tumors. The harm alleged, neural and other tumors would here be reasonably foreseeable as a likely consequence of the failure to warn and was in fact foreseen by Schneider. A reasonable physician, indeed any reasonable person, could foresee that if someone was warned of “strong evidence” of a connection between treatments to which he or she had been subjected and tumors, he or she would probably seek diagnosis or treatment and perhaps avoid these tumors, and if he or she was not warned, then he or she probably would not seek diagnosis or treatment, increasing the likelihood that he or she would suffer from such tumors. Other things being equal, therefore, a reasonable physician would warn the subject of the treatments. Tasks: Discuss the preventative measures that should be taken to prevent recurrence of such cases. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format. Your initial posting should be addressed at 300–500 words. Submit your document to this Discussion Area by the due date assigned. Be sure to cite your sources using APA format.
RE: SOCW6311 - Assignment: Drafting a Process Evaluation(wk9)
Due 04/25/2019The steps for process evaluation outlined by Bliss and Emshoff (2002) may seem very similar to those for con ...
RE: SOCW6311 - Assignment: Drafting a Process Evaluation(wk9)
Due 04/25/2019The steps for process evaluation outlined by Bliss and Emshoff (2002) may seem very similar to those for conducting other types of evaluation that you have learned about in this course; in fact, it is the purpose and timing of a process evaluation that most distinguish it from other types of evaluation. A process evaluation is conducted during the implementation of the program to evaluate whether the program has been implemented as intended and how the delivery of a program can be improved. A process evaluation can also be useful in supporting an outcome evaluation by helping to determine the reason behind program outcomes.There are several reasons for conducting process evaluation throughout the implementation of a program. Chief among them is to compare the program that is being delivered to the original program plan, in order to identify gaps and make improvements. Therefore, documentation from the planning stage may prove useful when planning a process evaluation.For this Assignment, you either build on the work that you completed in Weeks 6, 7, and 8 related to a support group for caregivers, or on your knowledge about a program with which you are familiar. Review the resource “Workbook for Designing a Process Evaluation”.Submit a 4- to 5-page plan for a process evaluation. Include the following minimal information: Please us 2 other APA peer-reviwed references)A description of the key program elementsA description of the strategies that the program uses to produce changeA description of the needs of the target populationAn explanation of why a process evaluation is important for the programA plan for building relationships with the staff and management7-8 Broad questions to be answered by the process evaluation7-8 Specific questions to be answered by the process evaluationA plan for gathering and analyzing the informationReferencesBliss, M.J., &Emshoff, J.G. (2002) Workbook for designing a process evaluation. Retrieved from http://beta.roadsafetyevaluation.com/evaluationguides/info/workbook-for-designing-a-process-evaluation.pdfMan-Son-Hing, M., Laupacis, A., O’Rourke, K., Molnar, F. J., Mahon, J., Chan, K. B., & Wells, G. (2002). Determination of the clinical importance of study results. Journal of general internal medicine, 17(6), 469–476.
"Musical Artist" written assignment?
Choose a musical artist (from any music era) and provide a 1-2 page summary of the background or history of the artist. Ne ...
"Musical Artist" written assignment?
Choose a musical artist (from any music era) and provide a 1-2 page summary of the background or history of the artist. Next, pick one of his or her main works (songs or compositions) and explain:The meaningThe musical elementsThe contribution that this piece has had to the development of musicIf possible, find a way to listen to the piece so that you can comment on your reaction to the work.Thank you!
Earn money selling
your Study Documents