CRJ 551 Saint Leo University Suppression of Evidence Discussion

User Generated

wo1211

Writing

crj 551

Saint Leo University

CRJ

Description

Distinguish the use of a suspect’s statement as substantive evidence at trial from its use to impeach the testimony of the suspect at trial. Although there is a legal difference, does the jury comprehend the limited use of a suppressed statement when admitted to impeach? Does the fact that statements taken unlawfully may be used to impeach the defendant keep a defendant from exercising a constitutional right to testify at their trial? Explain your responses.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached. Please let me know if you have any questions or need revisions.

Running head: SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE

Suppression of Evidence
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation

1

SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE

2
Suppression of Evidence

A suspect's statement can be used as substantive evidence in a trial provided the person
who made the statement presents for testifying or being cross-examined. The process helps to
authenticate the statement. It m...

Similar Content

Related Tags