Description
Distinguish the use of a suspect’s statement as substantive evidence at trial from its use to impeach the testimony of the suspect at trial. Although there is a legal difference, does the jury comprehend the limited use of a suppressed statement when admitted to impeach? Does the fact that statements taken unlawfully may be used to impeach the defendant keep a defendant from exercising a constitutional right to testify at their trial? Explain your responses.

Explanation & Answer

Attached. Please let me know if you have any questions or need revisions.
Running head: SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE
Suppression of Evidence
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
1
SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE
2
Suppression of Evidence
A suspect's statement can be used as substantive evidence in a trial provided the person
who made the statement presents for testifying or being cross-examined. The process helps to
authenticate the statement. It m...
