Description
Constitutional Rights
Research, review and analyze Korb v. Raytheon, 707 F.Supp. 63 (D.Mass. 1989). Based on your research and the case, write a 5–6 page paper in which you:- Analyze and evaluate each case independently by providing the following (about two paragraphs per case):
- Facts of the case.
- Issues.
- Rule.
- Analyze and explain the challenges with freedom of speech.
- Analyze and explain any challenges with freedom of information.
- Analyze and explain any challenges with employment law.
- Analyze and discuss the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense.
- Analyze and discuss any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case.
- Provide at least four additional court cases that support your analysis.
- Assess how the U.S. Constitution and legal system addresses critical issues and challenges faced by public officials.
- Analyze and evaluate each case independently by providing the following (about two paragraphs per case):
- By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution's policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.
Explanation & Answer
Attached. Please let me know if you have any questions or need revisions.
Running Head: BUSINESS QUESTIONS
1
Business Questions
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Instructor
Course
Date
2
BUSINESS QUESTIONS
Business questions
Question 1: Analyze and evaluate each case independently by providing the following (about
two paragraphs per case):
• Facts
of the case.
• Issues.
• Rule.
Korb was the vice president of Raytheon organization. Raytheon is a corporation with the
mandate to develop military equipment. Korb was allowed by the employer to work with the
committee for national security (CNS), which was an organization meant to inform the
community concerning the issues of national security. The remarks that Korb made to the CNS
press were against the employer’s code of conduct. Due to Korb's statements, Raytheon decided
to terminate Korb's employment contract since he acted against what the organization expected
him to do.
Korb then sued the employer for wrongful termination in Massachusetts law court. The
foundation for Korb and his allegations over the employer was the Massachusetts state civil
rights statute and the first amendment of the U.S. As a result, the employer moved this case to
the Boston federal district court. After Raytheon moved the case to Korb amended the complaint
and decided to remove the references he had created to refer the case to the constitution.
The organization hired Korb to serve as the representative and spokesperson in some of
the company's areas. The vice president failed and spoke against the corporation interest.
Although he believed that he was acting neutral from the approach he made, the employer did
not believe in his abilities to address most of the company's operations.
3
BUSINESS QUESTIONS
The belief in acting privately and addressing the employer's issues did not want the
community to learn was not accepted positively by all. According to Korb, he intended to let the
press know that the Raytheon lobbyist supported the reduction of defence spending. According
to the employer, the financial stake he had for not addressing the respective position made him
capable of the respective position.
In the nation, no policy prohibits the employer from l...
Review
Review
