Use the “Inside Out” approach from chapter 10 of Apologetics at the Cross to respond to the following statement posted to you by a secular friend: “My biggest problem with Christianity is, for one, that Christians seem so intolerant and judgmental. And secondly, their sexual ethic seems to suppress basic human desires and our freedom to live fulfilled lives.” Remember to start inside their own plausibility structures and work to the explanatory power of the gospel. Make sure you thoroughly study the notes pertaining to this method as well as Keller’s section on A and B beliefs. Your essay must reflect, clearly explicate, and apply the central components of the “Inside Out” model as you engage your secular friend. Pay close attention to having a clear organization and relevant scholarly/academic sources, which must be used effectively. There must be at least 3 scholarly/academic references, used in addition to Apologetics at the Cross and the Bible. Do not simply string quotes together as this is not an effective way to persuade a friend. Lastly, although you are contemplating and interacting with a hypothetical scenario concerning how a conversation would go, avoid writing out an actual dialogue in the paper. You can make comments about how a conversation might begin or how it might progress, but do not write as if you are dialoging with your friend in the paper. Your paper must be 1,000-1,200 words. Submit your paper as Microsoft Word document with both prompts addressed. Essay 2 must use Times New Roman, 12-point font, follow current Turabian format.

The objective of this Assignment is to provide you with a private place to think on the page; “thinking on the page” is a phrase used to describe writing as a form of thinking. Some of us process our thoughts out loud as we describe them to others. In an academic environment, you will be asked to record your ideas in writing or “thinking on the page” to show the new knowledge that you’ve acquired through reading and listening to the resources and completing the assignments. The journal is not a formal type of writing and only you and your Instructor will see the journal entry.The weekly journals will be used to develop a personalized academic writing plan that will fit into the Week 6 Personal Success Plan Assignment.Each journal must be at least three paragraphs long, but you are allowed to write as much as you would like. These entries are meant to be free writing, but you should revise before submitting. Your journal entries will be graded on participation and do not have rubrics.To prepare for writing your Journal entry:Review the Montante article in the Week 3 Learning ResourcesReview the Academic Writing Expectations Checklist to guide your writingReview sample journal entries posted in an Announcement.Assignment Instructions:Think about the material you encountered in the course this week, and describe one aspect of the classroom resources (Assignments, Discussions, or assigned readings) that surprised you. Make sure to describe why the material interested you as a thinker.Set a timer (on the stove, a clock or on your phone) and write for ten minutes without stopping. The prompts will remain the same each week, but you will reflect about a different aspect of each week’s resources.Post an entry that addresses each of the following:Observe. Describe the week’s content and resources to a person who has not seen/heard or observed it.Process. Answer the question: “What does this content/topic mean?”Reflect. Answer the question: “What is the value in understanding this?”