COMPS help, writing homework help

timer Asked: Nov 13th, 2016
account_balance_wallet $40

Question Description

Part 1
Using Gelso (2006), Harlow (2009), Stam, H. (2007, 2010), Wacker (1999), and five additional peer-reviewed articles from your specialization, discuss scholarly views on the nature and types of theory. Compare and contrast at least three views of what constitutes a theory, including the view you will use in Part 3 of this question. Be sure to distinguish theory from related concepts, such as hypothesis, paradigm, model, and concept.

Part 2
Using Ellis & Levy (2008), Harlow, E. (2009), and five additional peer-reviewed articles, review the scholarly literature on the relationship between theory and research and the ways research (quantitative and qualitative) can contribute to theory. Discuss at least three ways research can contribute to theory.

Part 3
Pick a theory (in one of the views of what constitutes a theory that you identified in Part 1) of current interest directly related to the topic area of your dissertation. A theory is currently of interest if there are articles published on it in the past five years. Using at least 10 published, peer-reviewed research articles:

1. Explain how the theory adds or may add to our understanding of your field and/or research topic.

2. Discuss and analyze the literature on two areas of controversy or unanswered questions related to the theory.

10 pages in all

Tutor Answer

School: Duke University



Running Head: DISCUSION

Institution Affiliation




In this paper, the hypothetical systems for Reliability growth designing examination are

talked about. In the paper the nature and sorts of hypotheses and a correlation and differentiating
perspectives of what constitutes hypothesis, incorporating the perspectives basic in the field of
dependability building, in presented. The distinction amongst hypothesis and related ideas, for
example, theory, paradigm, model, and ideas are surveyed. The origination of a hypothesis and
its association with research are likewise examined. Quantitative and subjective strategies for
research are investigated, and their commitments to hypothesis are surveyed. The commitments,
discussions, and crevices in the recognized hypothesis will likewise be examined.
Literature Review
As indicated by Isac-Maniu (2010) Reliability growth hypothesis got from the area of
demography and adjusted the fundamental thought utilized there, particularly the rise in the rate
of mortality that is the proportion between the quantity of perished people and also the quantity
of those who survive in the meantime. As indicated by Isaic-Maniu (2010) in Reliability growth
idea when the passing rate turns into the danger or disappointment rate, in the context in which
the people (living creatures) are supplanted by items, for example, parts, subassemblies of a
framework. Dependability hypothesis clarifies disappointment in three unique districts, for
example, newborn child mortality, helpful life, and destroy disappointments. These three areas
characterize the bathtub bend of dependability. In his point of view, Roesch (2014) displayed
bathtub bend to gauge disappointments in every area.
Isaic-Maniu (2010) clarified Reliability growth as item disappointment because of an
item, a procedure, and an administration to encounter unfavorable working conditions more
eminently when the planned capacity are not executed securely and cost successfully. In any



case, dependability capacities diminish after some time because of destroy. As per Isaic-Maniu,
Reliability growth capacities diminish so that the dependability of thing will lessen clear time.
Interestingly, Reliability growth can be clarified as a methods for enhancing the best in class in
the field, having as a main priority that there is nothing which can be termed flawless, and also
the contrast between an inconsistent item with a powerful item is "simply" in the perception that
there will be a level of the never-zero likelihood of disappointment (Suhir, 2014)
Reliability growth seeks to guarantee item execution for an expected timeline without
disappointment. Thaduri, Verma, Gopika, Gopinath, and Kumar (2014) contended that
customary Reliability growth with consistent disappointment modes and a known process no
longer gives precise period to disappointment. The disappointment qualities ought to take into
consideration the material science of disappointment. Thaduri et al. clarified that the material
science of disappointment describes the way of the disappointment. While Ma, He, and Wu
(2014) contended that the present dependability process is fundamentally centered on item plan
and does not have a decent information of Reliability growth affirmation in the assembling
procedure, hence the Reliability growth process must incorporate assembling. Dependability
manages all parts of the procedure of disappointment, attempting to develop a given formulaic–
mathematical approach for this irregular wonder (Isaic-Maniu, 2010).

Framework dependability development (change) expectation concentrates on general framework
Reliability growth however needs clear approach to precisely appraise the guarantee life of basic
parts. Vervenne and Deconinck (2011) proposed another technique for anticipating framework
Reliability growth start with the assurance of the given single point component(s) basic to


framework dependability. While, Wei, Lin, Luo, Yang, and Konson (2014) built up a strategy to
foresee framework Reliability growth of numerous segments and their connections.
Examining different complex wonders permits analysts to clarify and anticipate
occasions. This investigation will analyze discoveries identified with research and hypothesis,
look into commitments to hypothesis, and Reliability growth hypothesis.
What makes up a comprehensive theory?
A theory is a hypothesis created with the intent to test the connections among factors to
give legitimate clarifications. A theory ought to clarify why the factors or develops are required
to identify with or impact each other (Gelso, 2006). As per Gelso (2006), a few speculations are
never refuted nor completely affirmed. There is a misconception concerning what makes up a
hypothesis (Gelso, 2006), in light of the fact that the term hypothesis has a few implications
(Harlow, 2009). Fundamentally, then, "a hypothesis is an announcement of the presumed
correlation that does exist between and among factors" (Gelso, 2006, p. 2). Corley and Gioia

(2011) depicted hypothesis as an affirmation of thoughts demonstrating interdependence between
those thoughts that gave the illuminations concerning how and why such a marvel happened.
As indicated by Corley and Gioia (2011) it gets to be evident that analyst ought to direct
a more open discourse amongst specialist and hypothetical commitments that both get from and
advise hone. While Stam (2010) noticed that hypothesis as an orderly representation of a
legitimate issue commun...

flag Report DMCA

Excellent job

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags
Study Guides

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors