Write a 1,400-word minimum strategic implementation plan in which you include the following: - APPLE Create an implementation plan including:ObjectivesFunctional tacticsAction itemsMilestones and deadlinesTasks and task ownershipResource allocationRecommend any organizational change management strategies that may enhance successful implementation.Develop key success factors, budget, and forecasted financials, including a break-even chart.Create a risk management plan including contingency plans for the identified risks. Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

The first attached file is the problem set11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

This work has to be based on Managers in the healthcare environment. or Future healthcare managers, executive manager. ONLY NEED TO FINISH ASSIGNMENT 1 Notes (week 1-6) are attached and must be used for completion of this assignment UK English is required for this assignment Solid academic(business) writing and Harvard style required MUST FOLLOW ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA___________________________________________________________________________________________________Length 1,000 wordsFor this assignment you will have to prepare a paper that critically discusses how organisations apply the strategic use of IS/IT to achieve IS/IT-enabled innovation.For the purposes of this assignment and this unit, IS/IT innovation should not focus on Apps, mobile devices, social media or similar aspects. If you are unsure, then consult your tutor.Some aspects and issues you may discuss in your paper could include (but are not limited to):Discuss at least 5 examples of the use of IS/IT for innovation.Highlight some success factors or some lessons learned (i.e. what went wrong?) for your examples. Discuss the impacts of internal factors (e.g. organisational, individual, and management factors) and external factors (e.g., market, industry, social, economic, technological and political/policy factors) on the success (or the failure) of IS/IT enabled innovation.Suggest recommendations and guidelines for helping organisations succeed in their efforts of embarking on using IS/IT for innovation with good explanation and discussion.Title pageTable of contentsIntroductionMain body of report with suitable headings and subheadingsConclusionsReference listAppendices (if relevant). You should apply relevant knowledge discussed in your unit. You should prepare for this assignment by reviewing the literature (i.e. by using ProQuest 5000 and Science Direct databases and searching the World Wide Web (i.e. via Google). You should show evidence that you have read at least 10 references, which should be published after January 2013, in the literature (including references from academic and professional publications) to prepare this assignment. A variety of references are expected including books, refereed journals, case studies, newspapers, magazines and electronic references.Format for Assignment 1You will be marked on communication as well as content. This is done to emphasise the importance of aiming for effective communication as well as good content – not only here in a university assignment, but also in your day-to-day work. After all, if you do not communicate and present your ideas well, it is much harder to have your ideas accepted by busy colleagues or executives.Your assignment should contain:References: Harvard Referencing Style is required in this subject. Marking criteria for Assignment 1The following specific marking criteria will be used for marking Assignment 1: Category Specific criteria Maximum marks MC 1: Content – clear understanding of issues (15 marks) Critically discuss at least 4 examples of organisational attempts at achieving IS/IT enabled innovation. 3.75 Critically discuss the success factors and lessons learned 3.75 Critically discuss the impacts of internal and external factors on the success (or the failure) of IS/IT enabled innovation 3.75 Suggest recommendations and guidelines for helping organisations succeed in their efforts of embarking on using IS/IT for innovation with good explanation and discussion 3.75 Category Specific criteria Maximum marks MC 2: Use of multiple sourcesof information and Referencing (3 marks) Good research effort evidenced by at least 8 references from a variety of sources; Good integration of references into your discussion; Proper practice of in-text citation and provision of all the cited references in the reference list via applying Harvard Referencing Style 3 MC 3: Quality, Communication and Presentation (2 Marks) Use of study materials; Use of proper terminology; Good structure of the report; Professionally formatted and presented; Being able to clearly express ideas; Clarity of communication with good flow, reasoning and argument; Concise but not over simplifying; Spelling and grammar (use of Spell-Checker!) 2 Total marks 20