CJS 315 University of Phoenix Amendments and Bill of Rights Paper

User Generated

YVYL88

Law

CjS 315

University of Phoenix

CJS

Description

Assignment Content

  1. Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you describe the key elements of the rights guaranteed by the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments and their impact on criminal procedure by the courts and police officers.
    Include an explanation of how the Bill of Rights applies to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
    Submit your assignment.

    Helpful Hints
    1. Do not quote any of these Amendments verbatim. It increases the amount of your paper that is comprised of quoted material and lessens the amount you actually write on your own. If you quote extensively, I won't know if you actually understand the material or are just good at cutting and pasting. Instead of quoting the amendments, spend you time in just explaining what rights each Amendment contains.
    2. Don't just list the rights these Amendments contain; EXPLAIN them.
    3. Do not discuss the Eighth Amendment here. It is not part of this assignment4. In regards to the Fourteenth Amendment, all I am looking for is how this Amendment was used to incorporate the Bill of Rights so that they also apply to the states.
    4. In regards to the Fourteenth Amendment, all I am looking for is how this Amendment was used to incorporate the Bill of Rights so that they also apply to the states.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached. Please let me know if you have any questions or need revisions.

Running Head: AMENDMENTS AND BILL OF RIGHTS

AMENDMENTS AND BILL OF RIGHTS
Name
Institution Affiliation

1

AMENDMENTS AND BILL OF RIGHTS

2

The fourth amendment

The 4th amendment protects individuals from irrational seizures and searches by the
authorities. Nevertheless, this amendment isn't an assurance against every seizure and search, but
just the ones considered to be irrational under the constitution. Whether a certain kind of search is
viewed as rationally based on the law is resolved by harmonizing two essential interests
(Baradaran, 2013). On the scale's first side is the imposition on a person's 4th amendment rights.
The second side contains the genuine government welfares like public safety. The degree to which
this amendment safeguards a person relies, to some extent, on the site of the seizure or search.

Seizures and searches within a house short of a warrant are presumably irrational.
Nevertheless, there are various exceptions. Searching without a warrant might be legal if a police
officer receives a search consent, if a legal arrest is part of the search, a credible reason to search
and urgent situations, and if the objects are visible. Suppose a police officer observes uncommon
behavior, which prompts him to conclude that illegal activity might be happening. In that case, the
poli...

Similar Content

Related Tags