​Research case of texas vs. Johnson (1989) do you agree with the verdict?explain

History
Tutor: None Selected Time limit: 1 Day

Research case of texas vs. Johnson (1989) do you agree with the verdict? explain. 

Nov 20th, 2014

The case of Texas v. Johnson ruled that the burning of the flag was a crime based on a Texas statute that prevented the desecration of a sacred object. However Mr. Johnson appealed to the Supreme court and they agreed to hear his case. The Supreme court found that flag burning constitutes free speech (or "symbolic speech"). 

I do not agree with this verdict namely because of the status we give our flag. It represents freedom and equality, and is even considered by some to be a banner of hope. Burning the flag does not represent free speech but rather an ignorance of what that flag really stands for. And the rights it gives to the person who so callously torches it under the guise of the first amendment. 


Good luck!

Nov 21st, 2014

Did you know? You can earn $20 for every friend you invite to Studypool!
Click here to
Refer a Friend
...
Nov 20th, 2014
...
Nov 20th, 2014
Dec 9th, 2016
check_circle
Mark as Final Answer
check_circle
Unmark as Final Answer
check_circle
Final Answer

Secure Information

Content will be erased after question is completed.

check_circle
Final Answer