Description
Mill claims that “It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.” Why does he think this is true?Additionally, explain how this can be used in defending the claim that his view presents an objective and universal measure for thinking about morality.
I need a through explaination of these question.
Explanation & Answer
Attached. Please let me know if you have any questions or need revisions.
Running head: MILL CLAIMS PHILOSOPHY
Mill's Philosophy
Student's Name
Instructor's Name
Institution Affiliation
Course Title
Date
1
MILL CLAIMS PHILOSOPHY
2
Mill's Philosophy
Mill argued that "it is better to be a dissatisfied human than a satisfied pig" because of the
superiority quality he gives to a human being. Most contemporary utilitarian share this notion of the
human species to the superior value of normal life. In making this statement, Mill was defending the
principle of utilitarianism, which he explains that actions are right if it tends to promote happiness to
the greatest number of people (Mill, 2016). Therefore, this quote's concept lies in understanding Mill's
argument regarding human motivation and the nature of happiness.
Mill thinks he is right because of his belief that the human conception of happiness cannot be
satisfied by pleasures alone. He strongly suggests that comparing human life to an animal degrades the...
Review
Review
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!