How does the distinction between per se and per accidens causes help to clarify the argument for the divine informer?
When Aquinas in this talks about this can't go on to infinity he means that an infinite regress can't exist in itself. Something that is always active must be responsible for things that are in motion.
Content will be erased after question is completed.
Enter the email address associated with your account, and we will email you a link to reset your password.
Forgot your password?