Business Finance
criminal justice, law homework help

Question Description

Please see attached

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Welcome to the final exam! Please WRITE SUBSTANTIVE ESSAYS! This means SEVERAL PARAGRAPHS for each answer, with citations in bluebook format. Write your essays in Word or another program and copy them into the exam. Each essay must be a minimum of 500 words in length. In addition, you are required to combine all four of your essays into one Word document 1.What are the two rationales for the crime of attempt? Provide an example of each. 2. Discuss and define the crimes of arson and criminal mischief. Give examples. 3. According to the felony murder rule, unintentional deaths that occur during the commission of another felony are murders. The law varies widely, due mainly to efforts to limit the rule in a number of ways. One of the limitations involves the crimes to which the rule applies. Explain this limitation. Provide some examples of crimes that would qualify for the felony murder rule. 4. Discuss some of the new ways that computers and the internet have made it possible for criminal to commit old crimes. Provide examples of how the law has changed to accommodate these new forms of old crimes. ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Final Answer

Attached.

Criminal Justice Final Exam

Student Name
Student ID

Course ID
Instructor

Question One
There are two rationales for the crime of attempt. These are; dangerous acts (actus reus)
and dangerous persons (mens rea). The dangerous acts as a rationale of a crime of attempt try to
look at how close the defendants came to accomplishing the crime. It also pays keen attention on
the objectives to prevent harm from dangerous conduct. In this regard, it is important to use
proximity tests to determine how close the intended crime was so as to make it be counted as a
criminal act. Some of the proximity test used include physical proximity. This shows the
dangerous proximity test 1 . In the dangerous proximity test, there are some elements that must be
determined. For instance, it is vital to find out how dangerously close was criminal to
committing the crime; it also focuses on the exact actions that the criminal have to do in order to
carry out their objective2 .
Dangerous persons as a rationale of crimes of attempt look keenly at how fully
defendants have established their criminal determination. It also aims at neutralizing people.
The indispensable element test determines whether the person has received everything that they
need to order to accomplish the crime. Unequivocality (res ipsa loquiter) test explains that the act
speaks for itself 3 . It should also determine that anyone who saw them were able to determine that
they were preparing to commit a crime. When the defendants have gone too far to committing
the intended crime, they will commit it, and there are very minimal chances that they will turn
back. Under MPC substantial test, actus reus of attempt is checked using two elements; (1) the
significant steps that the criminal has taken towards completing the crime. (2) Steps that toughly

1 JOEL SAMAHA, STUDY G UIDE (Cengage
2 Id.
3

Learning 2013).

NICOLA LACEY ET AL., RECONSTRUCTING CRIMINAL LAW: TEXT AND MATERIALS: TEXT AND
MATERIALS (LexisNexis UK, 3d ed. 2003).

incorporate the defendant’s criminal intention 4 . From this, it should be noted that preparation is
not an attempt to commit a crime. This is why most states have already enacted laws that
penalize preparation separately from an attempt to commit a crime.
For example, in the case of People v. Rizzo, it was reported that Rizzo, who was the
defendant and his three friends were driving around the town and looking for someone whom
they could rob but they got arrested. They were tried and charged with attempted robbery. In this
case, this was attempt actus reus because the acts were tending to the execution of the crime. The
crime was so near to being completed because there are very high chances that the crime would
have been committed had they had not been interfered with.
An example of mens rea includes the case of People v. Kimball in which Kimball, the
defendant was working at the Alpine Party Store where he went to women at the cash registry
and demanded money from them. He then claimed it was a joke. When the court did an
investigation on the matter, enough eviden...

Ellah (1054)
Rice University

Anonymous
The tutor was pretty knowledgeable, efficient and polite. Great service!

Anonymous
Heard about Studypool for a while and finally tried it. Glad I did caus this was really helpful.

Anonymous
Just what I needed… fantastic!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors