By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assignment criteria:Competency 1: Transformation: Facilitate a change process that effectively involves patients, communities, and professionals in the improvement and delivery of health care and wellness. Write a clear, one sentence problem statement for a proposed project.Develop evidence-based recommendations and conclusions.Competency 2: Execution: Translate strategy to develop and maintain optimal organizational performance in health care settings. Identify key performance indicators and outcome measures for the proposed projectSummarize key findings from your review of current and relevant authoritative literature.Analyze performance data and trends.Competency 3: People: Create an organizational climate that values and supports employees and colleagues in health care settings. Present a concise, substantive project overview to stakeholders that is supported by authoritative sources.InstructionsUse the Data Review Project Report Presentation Template linked in the Resources, to design your presentation and ensure that you include all required content.Problem statement.Performance indicators examined and units of measurement.Key findings from the literature.Data presentation.Data analysis.Evidence-based recommendations.Conclusion.References.Include a minimum of two data displays (for example, pie chart, graph, spreadsheet, and process map) with descriptive titles, performance indicators examined, and units of measurement.Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your presentation addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Data Review Project Report Presentation Scoring Guide to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.Write a clear, one sentence problem statement for a proposed project. State the issue in the form of a problem, and add a citation.Identify key performance indicators and outcome measures for the proposed project. Are the performance indicators appropriate and relevant for examining the problem?Explain how each performance indicator that relates to the problem will be measured.Be precise in explaining how the outcome will be measured.Summarize key findings from your review of current and relevant authoritative literature. Provide sufficient breadth and depth in the summary to adequately cover the selected topic.Analyze performance data and trends. Present your visual data displays, along with a concise analysis.Describe the significant findings, trends, and any new insights evident from the data summaries.Develop evidence-based recommendations and conclusions. With regard to the problem you are examining, you are encouraged to: Explore government agencies, accrediting bodies, scholarly journals, and similar authoritative sources for insights on meeting industry standards.Review best practices literature for insights into how to solve the problem.Review current literature for assessment, compliance, and other contemporary tools that directly measure and address the problem.Present your results and findings, recommendations, and leadership insights.Include a minimum of two evidence-based recommendations from the current (within the past 3–5 years) authoritative sources.Most importantly, your conclusion should include a clear statement about how the project added value and was aligned with, the organization.Present a concise, substantive project overview to stakeholders that is supported by authoritative sources. Be clear and focused in your presentation.Address the anticipated needs and concerns of your audience.Apply best practices to the design and development of your presentation materials.Support your main points, arguments, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.Be sure to format citations and references using APA style.

Clinical Assignment: Quality Improvement Final Project (Medical Errors). This is the final project (Putting it all together for the final Quality Improvement Project). You will find attached the 3 Parts previously completed by you.Goal:To assess a clinical issue that is the focus of the Quality Improvement Project.Evaluate the clinical project.Putting it all together for the final Quality Improvement Project.Content Requirements:A description of the clinical issue to be addressed in the project.A SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis for the project. Analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to the quality improvement process.An outline of the action plan for the project.An assessment of clinical issue that is the focus of the quality improvement project.Discuss stakeholders and decision makers who need to be involved in the quality improvement project.Discuss resources including budget, personnel and time needed for the quality improvement project.Discuss potential strategies for implementation and evaluation.Submission Instructions:The paper is to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.The final project is to be 8 - 12 pages in length and formatted per current APA, excluding the title, abstract and references page.Incorporate a minimum of 9 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET on Sunday.Grading Rubric Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.Final Essay/Paper RubricCriteriaRatingsPointsIdentification of Main Issues/ProblemsDistinguished - 10 points Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.Excellent - 8 pointsIdentifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.Fair - 6 pointsIdentifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.Poor - 4 pointsIdentifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.10 pointsAnalysis and Evaluation of Issues/ProblemsDistinguished - 10 pointsPresents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.Excellent - 8 pointsPresents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.Fair - 6 pointsPresents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.Poor - 4 pointsPresents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.10 pointsDemonstrates a Conceptual UnderstandingDistinguished - 10 pointsProvides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.Excellent - 8 pointsProvides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.Fair - 6 pointsProvides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.Poor - 4 pointsProvides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.10 pointsUse of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/LiteratureDistinguished - 10 pointsEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.Excellent - 8 pointsEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.Fair - 6 pointsIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.Poor - 4 pointsIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.10 pointsWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting GuidelinesDistinguished - 10 pointsDemonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.Excellent - 8 pointsDemonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.Fair - 6 pointsDemonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.Poor - 4 pointsDemonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.10 pointsTotal Points 50

 Content Root Cause Analysis Now that you have completed a Gemba Walk and have gathered information about the organization and identified opportunities to eliminate inefficiencies, reduce waste, improve a product, or streamline a process, it is time to take a closer look at these problems and get to the root cause of why they are happening. Additional Resources For more information about how to use 5 Whys or a Fishbone diagram to conduct a root cause analysis, check out the following links: 5 Whys: Getting to the Root of a Problem Quickly Cause and Effect Analysis: Identifying the Likely Causes of Problems Assignment Instructions Create either a 5 Whys or a Fishbone diagram for each of the two short-term opportunities and the one long-term opportunity you identified during your Gemba Walk. Work through each step of the 5 Whys or Fishbone processes to find the root cause(s) of each problem.