NYU Week 5 Holistic Worldview Analysis

User Generated

xnz19

Health Medical

PUB 655

New York University

PUB

Description

IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING WORD LIMIT REQUIREMENTS:

Please note that each and every assignment has its own word limit.

Participatory learning and action (PLA) tools are used to engage communities in a process of shared decision making around their strengths and assets. Action steps are often identified by the group to make social, economic, or environmental changes in their community. Select and practice one of the following participatory learning and action tools:

  • Community asset map
  • Holistic worldview analysis
  • Appreciative inquiry interview
  • Problem tree analysis (also called diagramming)
  • Photovoice

Guides on how to facilitate the tools are described in the community
engagement and PLA resources in the Topic Materials. Identify an individual or
group of individuals with whom you are currently working as part of your job,
service, volunteerism, or family. Review the selected tool and become familiar
with the process and purpose of the tool prior to facilitating it with your
selected individual or group.

In a 1,000-1,250-word essay, discuss the following:

  • What tool did you select and why did you select it instead of the other options?
  • What cultural insight did you learn based on the individual or group you selected? Include a brief description of the individual or group you engaged for this
    assignment.
  • What challenges did you identify in facilitating the tool?
  • Discuss how the participants responded to the tool regarding their participation and shared decision making. Consider how PLA tools are focused on building the
    capacity of people versus projects or programs.
  • A Health in All Policies approach, which include economic and environmental
    factors, is important in addressing the interconnectedness of health factors to
    support holistic transformation. Discuss how this community engagement approach through such a tool is useful for assessing a Health in All Policies approach. In addition, consider how this approach is effective in reducing health
    disparities by addressing economic and environmental issues through community
    mobilization and assets. Review the website and introductory report on "Health
    in All Policies," by the American Public Health Association (APHA), and "What
    You Need to Know About Health in All Policies," by the World Health
    Organization (WHO), located in the Topic Materials for additional insight.


Read Chapter 5 in For the Love of God: Principles and Practice of Compassion in Missions.

URL:

http://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/wipf-and-stock/2017/for-the-love-of-god_principles-and-practice-of-compassion-in-missions_1e.php

Read "Connecting Communities and Complexity: A Case Study in Creating the Conditions for Transformational Change," by Durie and Wyatt, from Critical Public Health (2013).

URL:

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbl&AN=RN330816879&site=eds-live&scope=site

Read "Cultural Humility: Measuring Openness to Culturally Diverse Clients," by Hook, Davis, Owen, Worthington, and Utsey, from Journal of Counseling Psychology (2013).  

URL:

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.338261279&site=eds-live&scope=site

Read "Reflections on Cultural Humility," by Waters and Asbill, from American Psychological Association CYF News (2013).

URL:

http://www.apa.org/pi/families/resources/newsletter/2013/08/cultural-humility.aspx

Read "Tyranny/Transformation: Power and Paradox in Participatory Development," by Christens and Speer, from Forum: Qualitative Social Research (2006).

URL:

http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/91/189

Read "A Basic Guide to ABCD Community Organizing," by McKnight, located on the DePaul University website.

URL:

https://resources.depaul.edu/abcd-institute/publications/publications-by-topic/Documents/A%20Basic%20Guide%20to%20ABCD%20Community%20Organizing(3).pdf

Read "Wholistic Worldview Analysis: Understanding Community Realities," by Jayakaran (2007), located on the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) website.

URL:

http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G02908.pdf

Read "Participatory Analysis for Community Action (PACA) Training Manual," from the Peace Corps Information Collection and Exchange, Publication No. M0053(2007), located on the Peace Corps website.

URL:

http://files.peacecorps.gov/multimedia/pdf/library/PACA-2007.pdf

Read "Empowering Communities: Participation Techniques for Community-Based Programme Development: Volume 2: Participant's Handbook," by De Negri, Thomas, Ilinigumugabo, Muvandi, and Lewis(1998), located on the Participatory Methods website.

URL:

http://www.participatorymethods.org/sites/participatorymethods.org/files/Empowering%20communities_de%20Negri.pdf

Read "Generic Processes of Appreciative Inquiry," located on The Center for Appreciative Inquiry website.

URL:

https://www.centerforappreciativeinquiry.net/more-on-ai/the-generic-processes-of-appreciative-inquiry/

Watch "Appreciative Inquiry," by Townsin (2013), located on the YouTube website.

URL:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzW22wwh1J4

Read "Ten Seed Technique," by Jayakaran, located on the Dr. Ravi Jayakaran website.

URL:

http://ravijayakaran.com/home.htm

Read "Toolkit," from the Asset-Based Community Development Institute, located on the DePaul University website.

URL:

https://resources.depaul.edu/abcd-institute/resources/Pages/tool-kit.aspx

Read "Open Questions," by Goetzman, located on the Global Learning Partners, Inc. website.
 

URL:

https://online.nph.net/media/documents/TeachtheWord/open-questions.pdf

Read "Section 20: Implementing Photovoice in Your Community," in Chapter 3 of the Community Tool Box website. 

URL:

https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/assessing-community-needs-and-resources/photovoice/main

Read the Health in All Policies page of  the American Public Health Association website, and download and read the PDF, “An Introduction to Health in All Policies: A Guide for State and Local Governments.”

URL:

https://www.apha.org/topics-and-issues/health-in-all-policies

Read "What You Need to Know About Health in All Policies," located on the World Health Organization (WHO) website.

URL:

http://www.who.int/social_determinants/publications/health-policies-manual/key-messages-en.pdf

Explore the Best Practices in Global Health Missions website.

URL:

http://www.bpghm.org/

Explore the Global CHE Network website.  

URL:

https://www.chenetwork.org/


Unformatted Attachment Preview

Course Code PUB-655 Class Code PUB-655-O500 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) Tool Selected and Rationale 10.0% Participants Described and Cultural Insight Provided 15.0% Challenges in Facilitation of the Tool 15.0% Effectiveness of PLA Tool Related to Shared Decision Making and Building Capacity 15.0% Health in All Policies (C:1.2) 15.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Benchmark - Participatory Learning and Action Tools Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Participatory learning and action (PLA) tool and rationale are not present. Participants described and cultural insight are not present. Challenges in facilitation of the tool are not present. Effectiveness of PLA tool related to shared decision making and building capacity is not present. Health in All Policies is not present. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 200.0 Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Participatory learning and action (PLA) tool and rationale indicate less than satisfactory search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. Participants described and cultural insight indicate less than satisfactory reflection. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. Challenges in facilitation of the tool are not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. Effectiveness of PLA tool related to shared decision making and building capacity indicates less than satisfactory reflection. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. Health in All Policies indicates less than satisfactory reflection. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (79.00%) Participatory learning and action (PLA) tool and rationale indicate adequate search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. Participants described and cultural insight indicate adequate reflection. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. Challenges in facilitation of the tool are communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. Effectiveness of PLA tool related to shared decision making and building capacity indicates adequate reflection. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. Health in All Policies indicates adequate reflection. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (87.00%) Participatory learning and action (PLA) tool and rationale indicate sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. Participants described and cultural insight indicate sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. Challenges in facilitation of the tool are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. Effectiveness of PLA tool related to shared decision making and building capacity indicates sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. Health in All Policies indicates sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) Participatory learning and action (PLA) tool and rationale indicate outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. Participants described and cultural insight indicate outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. Challenges in facilitation of the tool evidenced outstanding depth and are addressed with supporting details. Effectiveness of PLA tool related to shared decision making and building capacity indicates outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. Health in All Policies indicates outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Comments Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached. Please let me know if you have any questions or need revisions.

COMMUNICATION

1
Holistic Worldview Analysis

Often, Participatory Learning and Action, PLA tools tend to engage the society in a
mutual decision-making process concerning their assets and strengths to make economic, social,
and environmental changes impacting their health (de Brún et al., 2017).
Selected Tool and Selection Rationale
Cultural Insights Learned from the Selected Group
Challenges Identified in Facilitating the Holistic Worldview Analysis Tool
How Participants Responded to Holistic Worldview Analysis
A Health in All Policies Approach and Holistic Worldview Analysis Tool

COMMUNICATION

2
References

American Public Health Association, APHA (2021). Health in All Policies. For Science. For
Action. For Health. https://www.apha.org/topics-and-issues/health-in-all-policies

Choy, Y. K. (2018). Cost-benefit analysis, values, wellbeing, and ethics: an indigenous
worldview analysis. Ecological Economics, 145, 1-9.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yee_Keong_Choy/publication/323487077_Costbenefit_Analysis_Values_Wellbeing_and_Ethics_An_Indigenous_Worldview_Analysis/l
inks/5baad7c8a6fdccd3cb733544/Cost-benefit-Analysis-Values-Wellbeing-and-EthicsAn-Indigenous-Worldview-Analysis.pdf
de Brún, T., O’Reilly-de Brún, M., van Weel-Baumgarten, E., Burns, N., Dowrick, C., Lionis,
C., & MacFarlane, A. (2017). Using Participatory Learning & Action (PLA) research
techniques for inter-stakeholder dialogue in primary healthcare: an analysis of
stakeholders’ experiences. Research involvement and engagement, 3(1), 1-25.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/hex.12598

Krainyukov, S. V. (2019). Influence of modern information technologies on the
worldview. Social Psychology and Society, 10(4), 23-41.
https://psyjournals.ru/en/social_psy/2019/n4/Krainyukov.shtml

World Health Organization, WHO. (2017). Health in all policies: a training manual. World
Health Organization. http://www.who.int/social_determinants/publications/healthpolicies-manual/key-messages-en.pdf

COMMUNICATION

3


HEALTH AND MEDICAL

1

Holistic Worldview Analysis

Name
Institutional Affiliation
Instructor
Course title
Date

HE...


Anonymous
Really great stuff, couldn't ask for more.

Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags