Description
what is professional presence in your own words?
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
The urge to succeed no matter what and perform at your best in the workforce.
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Just what I needed…Fantastic!
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Business Law F-IRAC 2 questions
Ive uploaded a file for help. Just answer the 2 questions. 2 questions both are to use good F-IRAC form. Remember in the ...
Business Law F-IRAC 2 questions
Ive uploaded a file for help. Just answer the 2 questions. 2 questions both are to use good F-IRAC form. Remember in the case of FIRAC we add a fuller fact summary prior to starting the IRAC. This is used to provide you enough facts to build your analysis. If a fact is given to you it is there for a reason.Sometimes however, facts can be summarized by an expression rather than specifics – for example extensive studies rather than every study. But then know you will need to go back to the original fact pattern for details to use in the Analysis: Each question is worth 150 pointsFacts:ISSUE:RULE:ANALYSIS:CONCLUSION: Question 1Consider Due Process & Equal Protection, Privileges and ImmunitiesThe state of Sand Crabs, facing the southern border of our country, has experienced an increase in crime, and a deterioration of effective policing. Most of the crime increase involves crimes of theft, robbery, burglary. Almost all have been crimes of violence without resulting arrests. Residents and businesses alike have been victimized. It has also been documented that over the years there has been an increase in illegal border crossings. Police have literally been under attack. There has been a 32% increase of officers injured during active crime deployment in the last 18 months. This has resulted in several full disability severances for female officers. At the same time, the State Police force has experienced increased numbers of civil law suits and federal investigation attributed in a rise in the shooting of criminal suspects by a largely young officer base. Many senior officers claim that these young, limited English speaking officers lack patience when responding to crime scenes and do not understand local culture. Rising temperatures have made out-door patrols a grueling operation.In response to these conditions, a group of state legislators are developing a bill, which will be introduced into the legislature with full hearing, to increase state police forces. It limits member of the state police force to male citizens of the United States who are over the age of 20 years and who have lived in the state for 12 months.You are asked, using F-IRAC, to review the Constitutional issues of this proposal.Question 2 Consider Commerce Clause, Dormant Commerce Clause, SupremacyPreemption issuesGolden is a privately-owned company engaged in the business of disposing toxic waste generated by mining companies. Golden operates pursuant to a license issued by the state of Alpha. This license authorizes Golden to contract with miners to provide the following services: (i) collection of toxic waste at mine sites, and (ii) transportation of that waste to Golden's disposal station, which is in Alpha, three miles from the border with the state of Beta.In accordance with the authority granted by its license for the past 10 years Golden has contracted to provide services to miners in Alpha. Recently, Golden expanded its business to serve the miners in Beta and emerging battery businesses across the border in Beta.Shortly after Golden extended its services to the Beta miners and plants, the residents of the town from which the toxic waste disposal station operates started complaining about the rash of skin irritations, and increased illness.Prior to Golden's expansion of service to the State of Beta miners and the battery business, the U.S. Congress has passed legislation promulgating standards for safe disposal of toxic materials including batteries.The residents petitioned the State of Alpha to close Golden's disposal station. Golden objected. The Commissioner held open hearings. Following the hearings, the state issued an order that the use of Golden's disposal station would be limited to toxic waste from Alpha miners only. The Beta miners and battery businesses were barred from disposing of their toxic waste through Golden.Both Golden and the State of Beta have filed suit against State of Alpha seeking to rescind the order. Develop a F-IRAC for the constitutional legal issues.
GC 2010 New York University Ethics Leadership Interview Discussion
the specific requirement in the picture leadership interview , I will provide my interview essay here and please revise it ...
GC 2010 New York University Ethics Leadership Interview Discussion
the specific requirement in the picture leadership interview , I will provide my interview essay here and please revise it and make sure that the interview meet the requirement.
Saudi Electronic University Module 13 Typologies of Followership Discussion
Dear,one page discussion,please Avoid plagiarism,include referencediscussion details included in attached file
Saudi Electronic University Module 13 Typologies of Followership Discussion
Dear,one page discussion,please Avoid plagiarism,include referencediscussion details included in attached file
Discuss the following
PART 1 See discussion requirements under Week 1 discussion above. CONFIRMATION BIASI regretfully apologize for the exten ...
Discuss the following
PART 1 See discussion requirements under Week 1 discussion above. CONFIRMATION BIASI regretfully apologize for the extended instruction, but I could not avoid it! And please watch the Movie Moments, too! The absolute biggest obstacle to critical thinking is 'confirmation bias.'There are many definitions and most mention the searching for information confirming our beliefs: you must know that that is not intentional – most often not even conscious! We are, by and large, unaware of being biased.There are many errors we commit during even one single day. 'Why the errors,' you may ask, and the short answer is that we (have to) use shortcuts when we form opinions because it would be impossible to research and study each and every decision, judgment, and opinion before we form them -- and that would be most of the time unnecessary anyway.The most serious errors in thinking we tend to commit are usually due to 'confirmation bias.' If people would not be biased they could come to an agreement or a compromise after careful deliberations, considering that that would be in their best interest -- but it rarely happens: from big government vs. small government to term limits to ‘who is “the” racist’ (as if it could be only one group), affirmative action, the death penalty, abortion, euthanasia, gay marriage, drug laws, republicans versus democrats, liberals vs. conservatives, labor unions, taxes, health care law, gun control, animal rights, 'vaccination issues,' 'a women's place is in the kitchen' (or not!), jobless benefits, environmental protection, wars, education, evolution, school prayer, police powers, 'living wages,' drinking age, alternative medicine, GMOs (genetically modified crops), speed limit, government data collection… just to name a few.The basis of conflict often is the subjective nature of our decisions. Disagreements, disputes, screaming matches, physical fights, lawsuits, and war between nations are all there to prove in a very real and painful way that at least one party must be wrong in each conflict/disagreement while strongly believing just the opposite (but in most cases, both are -- even if not always equally. How can that happen?Our book mentions cognitive bias and discusses actual examples of it in various chapters (briefly and well): Pgs. 6, 102-104, 109, 110, 116, 123, 145, 312-314, and 348-349, but it does not define it clearly. Confirmation bias is the UNCONSCIOUS tendency to confirm our already existing leanings, propensities, beliefs, and prejudices, or hasty decisions.We are not only ignorant of our biases but are also often unable to recognize them even when they are pointed out to us! We will rather believe that those who call us biased are biased, mistaken, and/or malicious (please check out 'fundamental attribution error').We often commit the following errors related to confirmation bias:Selective scrutiny: accepting data/argument without much scrutiny from sources or for proposals we like but with much scrutiny from the ones we do not like (example: buying a new car)Selective recall: remembering events that support our opinion and not those that contradict itPattern seeking: seeing 'proof' that 'something is going on' because of certain 'mysterious' coincidences (see Movie Moment #1).Affirming the question: when people are asked if they are happy with their social life, almost 70% would answer yes and about 20% no, but if the question is asked the other way, asking them if they are unhappy with their social life, then approx. 70% would respond yes to that question as well (in each instance, people think about reasons they may be happy -- or unhappy -- and find enough reasons to say, yes, they are.Avoiding cognitive dissonance: accepting certain ideas because they are consistent with our existing worldview/opinion or rejecting others because they are not -- instead of working through the issues themselves (which can be very difficult and/or unsettling)Demanding 'yes or no answers:' (seeing in black and white) being convinced that there must be absolutely good solutions, perfect (or perfectly rotten) people, or believing that someone who 'opposes' a 'bad' person is necessarily a 'good' person (as if we have never heard of gangs warring over turf, killing each other, for example). We often justify our (faulty) judgment by pointing out that the alternative is less than perfect as well.The above issues are but the tip of the iceberg, so to speak, when it comes to confirmation bias (yes, there is an enormous amount of research about it). YOUR ASSIGNMENTPlease read the pages in the book on confirmation bias and research it on the internet -- and then, please describe an occasion that happened lately when you caught yourself falling into confirmation bias but after all ended up correcting yourself. Please do not forget: lying, cheating, consciously twisting the facts or torturing reasoning are NOT confirmation bias (they are just not the best behavior); however, strongly and often passionately believing that we are correct when all the evidence contradicting it is in front of our nose is the consequence of confirmation bias. Part 1- Your initial post: State your answers backed by the evidence you found. This 'initial post' has to be at least 300 words and is due by midnight on Wednesday.Part 2- Your response to two students: These comments have to be at least 200 words and are due on two different days. https://youtu.be/JhjUJTw2i1M PART 2 Critical Review-Evaluating Scientific Reports in the Media - Assignment It is important that you learn how to critically review research. In our society today, we are exposed to so much information and so many studies. Some of that information is excellent, some is useful, and some is very, very bad. How can you determine what information is useful and what is dangerous? One way is to take a course like Critical Thinking; however, the facts that I give you will be outdated all too soon. The most important thing you will learn from this course -- and from your college education -- is how to evaluate the information critically that is presented to you. Critical thinking involves asking five questions: who, what, when, where, how.Find and read an article in the media or a video clip that reports the results of a scientific study. You must include the link to the website. It is essential that the article you review would either argue for something or present a theory or idea with supporting evidence for its claims or conclusion. News items, even if they are about scientific discoveries are not suited for this assignment because news items report the news (naturally) and provide no theory or arguments and supporting evidence that could be criticized based on its strengths/weaknesses. Explanations/educational articles (such as WebMD explaining to us what certain conditions are) not good for our purposes either because they teach us something, telling us what is what, and thus do not provide supporting evidence that could be criticized. Teaching/explaining are very different from arguing! Please keep this in mind when you choose an article! Discuss how accurately did the mass media report the study? Answer the above five questions about the article (Who, What, When, Where, and How). Refer to page 353 of your text and be sure to cover all the highlights discussed. Do NOT use entertainment or sports articles for your review. The articles must be research-based and must include claims/conclusions and supporting evidence, which are to be criticized!. Directions:You will write a one-page critical review of the article. The review should answer each of the five questions. You must cite your source. If it is a website, please make sure you put the entire web address. Remember you are evaluating critically, not just summarizing. See the examples below the grading rubric:Week 4: Critical ReviewPoint ValueAdequately covers and answers the 5 questions, plus the summary section (10 points per section) 60 pointsChooses a scholarly/research article that presents a claim/idea/conclusion + supporting evidence that can be evaluated based on the strength/weakness of that evidence 20 pointsMeets the required word minimum (150 words) and posts word count 10 pointsFollows APA formatting with parenthetical citations and referencing 10 pointsTotal: 100 points
ART 3477 RC Hampton Board of Cultural Affairs Request for Grant Memorandum
Scenario You
have been asked to be on the town’s board of Cultural Affairs. When you
step into your new role, you qu ...
ART 3477 RC Hampton Board of Cultural Affairs Request for Grant Memorandum
Scenario You
have been asked to be on the town’s board of Cultural Affairs. When you
step into your new role, you quickly realize that the organization is
in trouble; the other board members have been on the board for a long
time and haven’t done much in recent years. They explain that there is
no money in the budget. You
hear about a grant opportunity. Every year, a wealthy resident of your
town, Mr. Brown, offers a grant of $10,000 to one local organization. In
the past, he has never given this grant to an arts organization
because, in the words of another board member, “Mr. Brown does not think
the arts are important.” If
you can change Mr. Brown’s mind about the importance of the arts in
your community, you might just get the grant and be able to revitalize
the town’s cultural arts scene! Write the grant proposal summary for review by a few board members to be sure you are on the right track for the grant. Instructions Compose this document in the format of a letter to Mr. Brown. Your letter should include: two to three paragraphs using persuasive language.concisely written paragraphs using bullet-points if possible.a beginning paragraph that immediately captures the reader's attention, using a story, surprising fact, or insightful quote.a complete but brief synopsis of the details in the proposal.the reason for the proposal and how the grant money will be used. Gr
Similar Content
Assignment Two
ToolsCorp Corporation is a fictitious company that does not exist anywhere. For the purpose of this course, it is located ...
MGT 311 SEU Operations Management Discussion
Demonstrate the concept of operations functions, supply chain strategy and issues required for a new production design. E...
Ethical Issues, Organizational Behavior, management homework help
Ethical Issues After completing this week's assigned readings', read the case “How Should Managers Handle Tough Manageme...
FITM Leadership Approach non profit organization Paper
Each student will select a (current serving) C.E.O./President of a business or other non-profit organization and profile t...
Case Study in business
Instructions and assigned reading is attached below....
MGT 301 Saudi Electronic University CH15 Culture and Diversity at The Workplace Paper
Read the assignment carefullyvery important to me the guarantee for the quality of contents and no plagiarism ,, reference...
Retirement
a. Record the transactions on the books of the Employees’ Retirement Fund. b. Prepare a Statement of Changes in Net Asse...
Paper Ford Company
Ford Motor Company has a complex management structure that has integrated the ownership and the management. This can be se...
Cost Management Class Notes_207732487-Ethics-Class-Notes
uploads/services/161584/Cost Management Class Notes_207732487-Ethics-Class-Notes.pdf...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Death Of A Salesmen
by Arthur Miller
Twelve Years A Slave
by Solomon Northrup
To Kill a Mockingbird
by Harper Lee
The Color Purple
by Alice Walker
Girl in Translation
by Jean Kwok
The Trial
by Franz Kafka
The Outsiders
by S.E. Hinton
The Nightingale
by Kristin Hannah
Crime and Punishment
by Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Business Law F-IRAC 2 questions
Ive uploaded a file for help. Just answer the 2 questions. 2 questions both are to use good F-IRAC form. Remember in the ...
Business Law F-IRAC 2 questions
Ive uploaded a file for help. Just answer the 2 questions. 2 questions both are to use good F-IRAC form. Remember in the case of FIRAC we add a fuller fact summary prior to starting the IRAC. This is used to provide you enough facts to build your analysis. If a fact is given to you it is there for a reason.Sometimes however, facts can be summarized by an expression rather than specifics – for example extensive studies rather than every study. But then know you will need to go back to the original fact pattern for details to use in the Analysis: Each question is worth 150 pointsFacts:ISSUE:RULE:ANALYSIS:CONCLUSION: Question 1Consider Due Process & Equal Protection, Privileges and ImmunitiesThe state of Sand Crabs, facing the southern border of our country, has experienced an increase in crime, and a deterioration of effective policing. Most of the crime increase involves crimes of theft, robbery, burglary. Almost all have been crimes of violence without resulting arrests. Residents and businesses alike have been victimized. It has also been documented that over the years there has been an increase in illegal border crossings. Police have literally been under attack. There has been a 32% increase of officers injured during active crime deployment in the last 18 months. This has resulted in several full disability severances for female officers. At the same time, the State Police force has experienced increased numbers of civil law suits and federal investigation attributed in a rise in the shooting of criminal suspects by a largely young officer base. Many senior officers claim that these young, limited English speaking officers lack patience when responding to crime scenes and do not understand local culture. Rising temperatures have made out-door patrols a grueling operation.In response to these conditions, a group of state legislators are developing a bill, which will be introduced into the legislature with full hearing, to increase state police forces. It limits member of the state police force to male citizens of the United States who are over the age of 20 years and who have lived in the state for 12 months.You are asked, using F-IRAC, to review the Constitutional issues of this proposal.Question 2 Consider Commerce Clause, Dormant Commerce Clause, SupremacyPreemption issuesGolden is a privately-owned company engaged in the business of disposing toxic waste generated by mining companies. Golden operates pursuant to a license issued by the state of Alpha. This license authorizes Golden to contract with miners to provide the following services: (i) collection of toxic waste at mine sites, and (ii) transportation of that waste to Golden's disposal station, which is in Alpha, three miles from the border with the state of Beta.In accordance with the authority granted by its license for the past 10 years Golden has contracted to provide services to miners in Alpha. Recently, Golden expanded its business to serve the miners in Beta and emerging battery businesses across the border in Beta.Shortly after Golden extended its services to the Beta miners and plants, the residents of the town from which the toxic waste disposal station operates started complaining about the rash of skin irritations, and increased illness.Prior to Golden's expansion of service to the State of Beta miners and the battery business, the U.S. Congress has passed legislation promulgating standards for safe disposal of toxic materials including batteries.The residents petitioned the State of Alpha to close Golden's disposal station. Golden objected. The Commissioner held open hearings. Following the hearings, the state issued an order that the use of Golden's disposal station would be limited to toxic waste from Alpha miners only. The Beta miners and battery businesses were barred from disposing of their toxic waste through Golden.Both Golden and the State of Beta have filed suit against State of Alpha seeking to rescind the order. Develop a F-IRAC for the constitutional legal issues.
GC 2010 New York University Ethics Leadership Interview Discussion
the specific requirement in the picture leadership interview , I will provide my interview essay here and please revise it ...
GC 2010 New York University Ethics Leadership Interview Discussion
the specific requirement in the picture leadership interview , I will provide my interview essay here and please revise it and make sure that the interview meet the requirement.
Saudi Electronic University Module 13 Typologies of Followership Discussion
Dear,one page discussion,please Avoid plagiarism,include referencediscussion details included in attached file
Saudi Electronic University Module 13 Typologies of Followership Discussion
Dear,one page discussion,please Avoid plagiarism,include referencediscussion details included in attached file
Discuss the following
PART 1 See discussion requirements under Week 1 discussion above. CONFIRMATION BIASI regretfully apologize for the exten ...
Discuss the following
PART 1 See discussion requirements under Week 1 discussion above. CONFIRMATION BIASI regretfully apologize for the extended instruction, but I could not avoid it! And please watch the Movie Moments, too! The absolute biggest obstacle to critical thinking is 'confirmation bias.'There are many definitions and most mention the searching for information confirming our beliefs: you must know that that is not intentional – most often not even conscious! We are, by and large, unaware of being biased.There are many errors we commit during even one single day. 'Why the errors,' you may ask, and the short answer is that we (have to) use shortcuts when we form opinions because it would be impossible to research and study each and every decision, judgment, and opinion before we form them -- and that would be most of the time unnecessary anyway.The most serious errors in thinking we tend to commit are usually due to 'confirmation bias.' If people would not be biased they could come to an agreement or a compromise after careful deliberations, considering that that would be in their best interest -- but it rarely happens: from big government vs. small government to term limits to ‘who is “the” racist’ (as if it could be only one group), affirmative action, the death penalty, abortion, euthanasia, gay marriage, drug laws, republicans versus democrats, liberals vs. conservatives, labor unions, taxes, health care law, gun control, animal rights, 'vaccination issues,' 'a women's place is in the kitchen' (or not!), jobless benefits, environmental protection, wars, education, evolution, school prayer, police powers, 'living wages,' drinking age, alternative medicine, GMOs (genetically modified crops), speed limit, government data collection… just to name a few.The basis of conflict often is the subjective nature of our decisions. Disagreements, disputes, screaming matches, physical fights, lawsuits, and war between nations are all there to prove in a very real and painful way that at least one party must be wrong in each conflict/disagreement while strongly believing just the opposite (but in most cases, both are -- even if not always equally. How can that happen?Our book mentions cognitive bias and discusses actual examples of it in various chapters (briefly and well): Pgs. 6, 102-104, 109, 110, 116, 123, 145, 312-314, and 348-349, but it does not define it clearly. Confirmation bias is the UNCONSCIOUS tendency to confirm our already existing leanings, propensities, beliefs, and prejudices, or hasty decisions.We are not only ignorant of our biases but are also often unable to recognize them even when they are pointed out to us! We will rather believe that those who call us biased are biased, mistaken, and/or malicious (please check out 'fundamental attribution error').We often commit the following errors related to confirmation bias:Selective scrutiny: accepting data/argument without much scrutiny from sources or for proposals we like but with much scrutiny from the ones we do not like (example: buying a new car)Selective recall: remembering events that support our opinion and not those that contradict itPattern seeking: seeing 'proof' that 'something is going on' because of certain 'mysterious' coincidences (see Movie Moment #1).Affirming the question: when people are asked if they are happy with their social life, almost 70% would answer yes and about 20% no, but if the question is asked the other way, asking them if they are unhappy with their social life, then approx. 70% would respond yes to that question as well (in each instance, people think about reasons they may be happy -- or unhappy -- and find enough reasons to say, yes, they are.Avoiding cognitive dissonance: accepting certain ideas because they are consistent with our existing worldview/opinion or rejecting others because they are not -- instead of working through the issues themselves (which can be very difficult and/or unsettling)Demanding 'yes or no answers:' (seeing in black and white) being convinced that there must be absolutely good solutions, perfect (or perfectly rotten) people, or believing that someone who 'opposes' a 'bad' person is necessarily a 'good' person (as if we have never heard of gangs warring over turf, killing each other, for example). We often justify our (faulty) judgment by pointing out that the alternative is less than perfect as well.The above issues are but the tip of the iceberg, so to speak, when it comes to confirmation bias (yes, there is an enormous amount of research about it). YOUR ASSIGNMENTPlease read the pages in the book on confirmation bias and research it on the internet -- and then, please describe an occasion that happened lately when you caught yourself falling into confirmation bias but after all ended up correcting yourself. Please do not forget: lying, cheating, consciously twisting the facts or torturing reasoning are NOT confirmation bias (they are just not the best behavior); however, strongly and often passionately believing that we are correct when all the evidence contradicting it is in front of our nose is the consequence of confirmation bias. Part 1- Your initial post: State your answers backed by the evidence you found. This 'initial post' has to be at least 300 words and is due by midnight on Wednesday.Part 2- Your response to two students: These comments have to be at least 200 words and are due on two different days. https://youtu.be/JhjUJTw2i1M PART 2 Critical Review-Evaluating Scientific Reports in the Media - Assignment It is important that you learn how to critically review research. In our society today, we are exposed to so much information and so many studies. Some of that information is excellent, some is useful, and some is very, very bad. How can you determine what information is useful and what is dangerous? One way is to take a course like Critical Thinking; however, the facts that I give you will be outdated all too soon. The most important thing you will learn from this course -- and from your college education -- is how to evaluate the information critically that is presented to you. Critical thinking involves asking five questions: who, what, when, where, how.Find and read an article in the media or a video clip that reports the results of a scientific study. You must include the link to the website. It is essential that the article you review would either argue for something or present a theory or idea with supporting evidence for its claims or conclusion. News items, even if they are about scientific discoveries are not suited for this assignment because news items report the news (naturally) and provide no theory or arguments and supporting evidence that could be criticized based on its strengths/weaknesses. Explanations/educational articles (such as WebMD explaining to us what certain conditions are) not good for our purposes either because they teach us something, telling us what is what, and thus do not provide supporting evidence that could be criticized. Teaching/explaining are very different from arguing! Please keep this in mind when you choose an article! Discuss how accurately did the mass media report the study? Answer the above five questions about the article (Who, What, When, Where, and How). Refer to page 353 of your text and be sure to cover all the highlights discussed. Do NOT use entertainment or sports articles for your review. The articles must be research-based and must include claims/conclusions and supporting evidence, which are to be criticized!. Directions:You will write a one-page critical review of the article. The review should answer each of the five questions. You must cite your source. If it is a website, please make sure you put the entire web address. Remember you are evaluating critically, not just summarizing. See the examples below the grading rubric:Week 4: Critical ReviewPoint ValueAdequately covers and answers the 5 questions, plus the summary section (10 points per section) 60 pointsChooses a scholarly/research article that presents a claim/idea/conclusion + supporting evidence that can be evaluated based on the strength/weakness of that evidence 20 pointsMeets the required word minimum (150 words) and posts word count 10 pointsFollows APA formatting with parenthetical citations and referencing 10 pointsTotal: 100 points
ART 3477 RC Hampton Board of Cultural Affairs Request for Grant Memorandum
Scenario You
have been asked to be on the town’s board of Cultural Affairs. When you
step into your new role, you qu ...
ART 3477 RC Hampton Board of Cultural Affairs Request for Grant Memorandum
Scenario You
have been asked to be on the town’s board of Cultural Affairs. When you
step into your new role, you quickly realize that the organization is
in trouble; the other board members have been on the board for a long
time and haven’t done much in recent years. They explain that there is
no money in the budget. You
hear about a grant opportunity. Every year, a wealthy resident of your
town, Mr. Brown, offers a grant of $10,000 to one local organization. In
the past, he has never given this grant to an arts organization
because, in the words of another board member, “Mr. Brown does not think
the arts are important.” If
you can change Mr. Brown’s mind about the importance of the arts in
your community, you might just get the grant and be able to revitalize
the town’s cultural arts scene! Write the grant proposal summary for review by a few board members to be sure you are on the right track for the grant. Instructions Compose this document in the format of a letter to Mr. Brown. Your letter should include: two to three paragraphs using persuasive language.concisely written paragraphs using bullet-points if possible.a beginning paragraph that immediately captures the reader's attention, using a story, surprising fact, or insightful quote.a complete but brief synopsis of the details in the proposal.the reason for the proposal and how the grant money will be used. Gr
Earn money selling
your Study Documents