English Composition II: Reflection, English homework help

User Generated

ZbqreaXengbf

Humanities

Description

Hello

I need help to write a reflection essay, answering the following questions:

A. What peer review feedback did you choose to incorporate concerning your argument and why?
B. What challenges did you face in developing your argument? What could you have done differently?
C. What peer review feedback did you choose to incorporate concerning your exploration of the issue and
why?
D. What peer review feedback did you choose to incorporate concerning your effective source
integration and why?
E. How did your incorporation of sources support your claim? What challenges did you face throughout
the writing process?

I have attached attached the rubric for guidance with this assignment. I have also included all my classmate feedback's as well

Guidelines for Submission: Your reflective essay must be 1-2 pages in length (plus a cover page if written in APA format) and must be written in MLA or APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Include at least four references from your final persuasive essay cited in MLA or APA format.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Assignment 3 Submission: Reflection First of all, take a deep breath and pat yourself on the back—you worked through the writing and research process to develop a persuasive essay. This is no easy feat, and you did it. Well done! Now, there is just one more assignment that needs to be completed in the course, and it's an important one. Reflection is a key component of any major project, including writing essays. It gives you an opportunity to look back at your progress in the course, as well as look towards future degree-specific courses. For this assignment, you will write a reflection that explores how you chose to incorporate feedback concerning your argument, exploration of the issue, and effective source integration into your persuasive essay as well as how your incorporation of resources supported your claim. Additionally, you will note any challenges you faced in incorporating resources and developing your argument throughout the writing process. Be sure to look over the assignment guidelines and rubric (Attached) to make sure you're fulfilling each aspect of the assignment. Constructing Your Reflection Answer the following questions to help you consider how you ultimately incorporated feedback from the Writing Workshop in Module 4 and how you handled any challenges during the writing process. Each response should be one fully developed paragraph in length (5-8 sentences). 1. What peer review feedback did you choose to incorporate concerning your argument and why? 2. What challenges did you face in developing your argument? What could you have done differently? 3. What peer review feedback did you choose to incorporate concerning your exploration of the issue and why? 4. What peer review feedback did you choose to incorporate concerning your effective source integration and why? 5. How did your incorporation of sources support your claim? What challenges did you face throughout the writing process? All my feedback’s for persuasive essay 1. Nice job. The revised paragraph is well-written and easy for readers to assimilate. The one thing I think you could do to further strengthen this paragraph would be to include one or two brief quotes or paraphrase from your research material. –Dineen Picerno 2. I really like the way that you revised your paragraph. While you did shorten your sentences, you also got to the point quicker and explained your ideas more clearly. You also corrected the few grammar mistakes that I had seen. The only thing that I think you need to do to this paragraph is to give an example or two of past and present business practices. That would give the reader a better idea of what your point is and how you are correct. Good luck with your paper! Danielle Rogers 3. I enjoyed reading your revision paragraph. I felt you did a much better job with clarification and detail. In the original I found myself confused during the first sentence, and in your revision it is short, understandable, and simple. In my opinion the revision could improve just a tad as far as readability and fluidity. One little suggestion I have is to maybe consider changing your sentences "Such was the case, long before the dawn of the computer and Internet age. Traditions were.." and instead merge them into "Long before the dawn of the Information Age, traditions were...". In my opinion the "Such was the case.." sentence is just kind of randomly injected there and it confused me while I was reading it. Also, your sentence that starts with "Security was a concern.." is a little difficult to understand initially, I didn't fully comprehend that sentence until I read further and understood what your paper is about. I would recommend, if that sentence is referencing the past or past business practices, using terms like "used to" "previously" and explain either how or why security was a different concern than today. I would suggest saying "previously security was such a concern that businesses had to.." or "Another concern for businesses was security, where companies previously had to.. 'enact extreme measures such as..' or 'be wary of dealing with certain people/practices' or 'have higher protective measures'." Anyways, I hope I helped and I enjoyed reading yours. Good luck with your paper! –Chelsey Welch 4. You did a good job; technology allows small businesses to reach new economic markets. Rather than just selling consumer goods or services in the local market, small businesses can reach regional, national and international markets. Retail websites are the most common way small businesses sell products in several different economic markets. Websites represent a low-cost option that consumers can access 24/7 when needing to purchase goods or services. Small business owners can also use Internet advertising to reach new markets and customers through carefully placed web banners or ads. –Isaac Aryeetey ENG 123: Assignment Three Guidelines and Rubric Overview The third final project for this course is the creation of a reflection. "Put the argument into a concrete shape, into an image, some hard phrase, round and solid as a ball, which they can see and handle and carry home with them, and the cause is half won." -Ralph Waldo Emerson In this assignment, you will write a reflection essay that explores how you chose to incorporate feedback concerning your argument, exploration of the issue, and effective source integration into your persuasive essay as well as how your incorporation of resources supported your claim. Additionally, you will note any challenges you faced in incorporating resources and developing your argument throughout the writing process. The final submission is due in Module Eight. In this assignment you will demonstrates your mastery of the following course outcomes: ENG-123-01: Develop stylistically appropriate writing that incorporates strategies for writing to a given audience, subject, and purpose ENG-123-02: Incorporate feedback from peer review for improving the quality and effectiveness of one's own writing ENG-123-03: Write informative introductions, coherent theses, well-developed, organized, and supported body paragraphs, and conclusions that are persuasive and supported by effective research ENG-123-04: Utilize appropriate research for developing a well-informed position through written composition Prompt For this essay, you identified an issue in your current major, a major you are interested in pursuing, or your field of work. You then established an argument and supported that argument with research and relevant evidence. In the third final project, you will reflect on how you chose to incorporate feedback concerning your argument, exploration of the issue, and effective integration of sources. Additionally, you will note any challenges you faced in incorporating resources and developing your argument throughout the writing process. Specifically the following Critical Elements must be addressed: Reflection A. What peer review feedback did you choose to incorporate concerning your argument and why? B. What challenges did you face in developing your argument? What could you have done differently? C. What peer review feedback did you choose to incorporate concerning your exploration of the issue and why? D. What peer review feedback did you choose to incorporate concerning your effective source integration and why? E. How did your incorporation of sources support your claim? What challenges did you face throughout the writing process? Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your reflective essay must be 1-2 pages in length (plus a cover page if written in APA format) and must be written in MLA or APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Include at least four references from your final persuasive essay cited in MLA or APA format. This assignment will be completed through the interactive activity provided in your MindEdge eLearning materials and then submitted through Blackboard. Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions. Critical Elements Reflection: Argument Reflection: Challenges Reflection: Exploration of the Issue Needs Improvement Not Evident Describes peer feedback that was incorporated into the argument in the final essay and justifies choice (85%) Describes peer feedback that was incorporated into the argument in the final essay but does not justify choice (55%) Does not describe peer feedback that was incorporated (0%) 10 Meets "Proficient" criteria and demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the reflection process (100%) Identifies challenges faced while developing argument and describes what could have been done differently (85%) Identifies challenges faced while developing argument but does not describe what could have been done differently (55%) Does not identify challenges faced while developing argument (0%) 30 Meets "Proficient" criteria and displays cogent connections to specific elements of essay (100%) Describes peer feedback that was incorporated into the exploration of the issue in the final essay and justifies choice (85%) Describes peer feedback that was incorporated into the exploration of the issue in the final essay but does not justify choice (55%) Does not describe peer feedback that was incorporated (0%) 10 Meets "Proficient" Describes peer feedback that Describes peer feedback that was Does not describe peer 10 Exemplary Proficient Meets "Proficient" criteria and displays cogent connections to specific elements of essay (100%) Va l u e Reflection: Effective Source Integration Reflection: Sources Articulation of Response criteria and displays cogent connections to specific elements of essay (100%) was incorporated into the effective integration of sources in the final essay and justifies choice (85%) incorporated into the effective integration of sources in the final essay but does not justify choice (55%) feedback that was incorporated (0%) Meets "Proficient" criteria and description is exceptionally clear and contextualized (100%) Describes how the incorporation of sources supported claim and explains challenges that were faced throughout the writing process (85%) Describes how the incorporation of sources supported claim and explains challenges that were faced throughout the writing process, but description lacks detail (55%) Does not describe how the incorporation of sources supported claim (0%) 30 Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format (100%) Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (85%) Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (55%) Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas (0%) 10 Earned Total 100%
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running Head: PEER REVIEW REFLECTION PAPER

Integrating Peer Review Feedback
Name
Instructor
Institutional Affiliation
Date

1

PEER REVIEW REFLECTION PAPER

2

The peers provided well informing feedback that was crucial in making my persuasive
paper better when incorporated. In this case, I chose to incorporate most of the suggestions of the
peers especially suggestion on the use of quotes and examples to bring out more clarity in my
arguments. I also chose to incorporate strong supporting sentences as suggested by some of my
peers in order to make the paper look better. I also consider merging some words which needed
support as suggested by my peers as this would make the reader fully comprehend the sentence
without much strain. Generally peer reviewed feedback created more sense to my rev...


Anonymous
Super useful! Studypool never disappoints.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags