First, let me start off by saying that I have just been burned on likeplum. I now only have a day deadline because the person that I selected last week for this project stated that they could complete it. When I received the sample work it was incomplete (not all questions were answered) and it did not even sound like my native language (English). Please ensure that you answer every single questions. There are multiple questions for each problem.Complete all questions listed below. Clearly label your answers.  1. What impact will an unanticipated increase in the money supply have on the real interest rate, real output, and employment in the short run? How will expansionary monetary policy affect these factors in the long run? .  2. How rapidly has the money supply (M1) grown during the past twelve months? State the rate of growth (use http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h6/) and the most recent release, use the seasonally adjusted figures. Calculate the rate of growth across the year by taking the (new amount of M1- old amount of M1)/old amount of M1). Given the state of the economy, should monetary authorities increase or decrease the growth rate of money? Explain why.  3. Is stability in the general level of prices through time important? Why or why not? Should price stability be the goal of monetary policy? Explain your responses.  4. Compare and contrast the impact of an unexpected shift to a more expansionary monetary policy under rational and adaptive expectations. Are the implications of the two theories different in the short run? Are the long-run implications different? Explain.

 HUMANITIES ART MUSEUM VISIT REPORT NOT PLAGIARISM Paint to write the report:   Author: Michiel Daniel   Name of the Paint: Four Gods Dispossessed   Year of the Paint: 1985   Watercolor on Paper This report is not a research paper.  You are to put your own observations and thoughts in your own words to evaluate a work of art.  If you do use statements or ideas from any other source, including the museum’s notes about the work, you MUST tell (document) where the information is from in a properly-formatted MLA citation. In the first paragraph, provide, in sentence form, the facts:  the name of the work, the artist, the date (or period if date is not specific), the medium in which it is done, and approximate size.  What style is it? The second paragraph is to be a detailed description of the work.  Present in words  exactly what you see.  Include significant aspects of the painting.  What is the subject?  How is it composed (arranged)?  Describe characters, setting (surroundings, location, background, etc.), objects, colors, light/shadow.  All these contribute to meaning. Here is where the material from the text's Introduction will be useful.  In the third paragraph, go into the content (meaning).  That is, what is the artist saying?  Determine the theme.  Look for iconography and symbolism.  What is the mood (feeling) it projects?  Are there social, political, moral, and/or religious implications?  (All of these may not be present in the work.)  What might be its relation to the time and place of its making?  What do you believe was the purpose of the work?  These are very important points because they are the reason for the painting's creation.  Think carefully. The fourth paragraph will be comparative in nature.  Choose a work in your textbook (from any chapter) which you see as sharing similarities with the one you have been analyzing.  Again, provide the name of it and the artist, its date, and the page number it is on so the reader can find it easily.  Apply the same evaluation criteria here.  (There is no need to go into a lengthy description of it since it is available to the reader.)  Tell how they are alike.  What reminds you of the museum work?  There may be several things: the subject, the theme, the period from which it comes, the artistic style, how the work is composed (arranged), iconography, symbolism, meanings, purposes, and so on.  Whatever the relationships you see, explain them in detail. The fifth paragraph is your personal response to the museum work.  Art engages not only the eye, but feelings and emotions and intellect as well.  Your task here is to show in words how this piece affected you.  Why did you choose it in the first place?  What did you like about it?  What was your aesthetic response to it?  (Look up the term aesthetics so you know exactly what you are describing.)  What specifically stimulated your feelings about it?  Maybe the story it tells, or artistic style, or symbolic images, or meaning, just to suggest a few possibilities.  Perhaps your own life experiences or associations brought memories that made you relate to it.  Or does it speak to your life now, or does it take you out of the here and now to another time and place?  Whatever motivated your selection, now is the chance to be subjective in your appraisal of the work.

two files45.docxsets.docx