Review the list of major historical events listed below and select one to examine for this assignment.The Pure Food and Drug ActThe Harrison ActProhibitionEnd of ProhibitionThe Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control ActWrite a 750-1,050-word paper about the selected historical event. Include the following in your presentation:A description of the eventThe history of the law(s) related to the drugThe impact of the drug on society to include how the legal status of the drug has impacted societyA description of how an understanding of the history and legality of the drug from the event has impacted the counseling professionA minimum of two scholarly referencesPrepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.1Unsatisfactory0.00%2Less than Satisfactory74.00%3Satisfactory79.00%4Good87.00%5Excellent100.00%70.0 %Content 10.0 %Historical EventEssay omits or incompletely describes the selected historical event. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Essay inadequately describes the selected historical event and/or the discussion is not historically accurate. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.Essay adequately describes the selected historical, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.Essay clearly describes the selected historical event, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.Essay expertly describes the selected historical event, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.20.0 %Law(s) Related to the DrugEssay omits or incompletely describes of the law(s) related to the drug from the selected event. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Essay inadequately describes the law(s) related to the drug from the selected event and/or the discussion is not historically accurate. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.Essay adequately describes the law(s) related to the drug from the selected event, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.Essay clearly describes the law(s) related to the drug from the selected event, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claim. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.Essay expertly describes the law(s) related to the drug from the selected event and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.20.0 %Impact of Drug on SocietyEssay omits or incompletely describes the impact of the drug on society including how the legal status of the drug has impacted society. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Essay inadequately describes the impact of the drug on society including how the legal status of the drug has impacted society. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.Essay adequately describes the impact of the drug on society including how the legal status of the drug has impacted society, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.Essay clearly describes the impact of the drug on society including how the legal status of the drug has impacted society, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claim. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.Essay expertly describes the impact of the drug on society including how the legal status of the drug has impacted society, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.20.0 %History and Legality Impact on Counseling ProfessionEssay omits or incompletely describes how an understanding of the history and legality of the drug from the selected event has impacted counseling profession. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Essay inadequately describes how an understanding of the history and legality of the drug from the selected event has impacted counseling profession. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.Essay adequately describes how an understanding of the history and legality of the drug from the selected event has impacted counseling profession, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.Essay clearly describes how an understanding of the history and legality of the drug from the selected event has impacted counseling profession, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claim. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.Essay expertly describes how an understanding of the history and legality of the drug from the selected event has impacted counseling profession, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 7.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 8.0 %Argument Logic and ConstructionStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage

Provide the full DSM-5 diagnosis for the client. Remember, a full  diagnosis should include the name of the disorder, ICD-10-CM code,  specifiers, severity, and the Z codes (other conditions that may need  clinical attention). Keep in mind a diagnosis covers the most recent 12  months. Explain the diagnosis by matching the symptoms identified in the case to the specific criteria for the diagnosis. Describe the assessment(s) you would use to validate her diagnosis, clarify missing information, or track her progress. Summarize how you would explain the diagnosis to the client. Explain how you would engage her in treatment, identifying potential cultural considerations related to substance use. Describe your initial recommendations for her treatment and explain why you would recommend MAT or ABT. Identify specific resources to which you would refer her. Explain  why you would recommend these resources based on her diagnosis and other  identity characteristics (e.g., age, sex, gender, sexual orientation,  class, ethnicity, religion, etc.).