After identifying different forms of positive communication and learning how to engage in positive relationships and supportive interactions in this module, you will now be reflecting on the importance of these interactions between children and parents as well as professional communication and your role as an ECE educator.Key Area of Practice for Module 05: Professional CommunicationsReflect on how your would encourage positive communication between children and their parents as well as your professional communication with families after reflecting on what you observed is the assigned videos for this assignment. Be prepared to explain how the activities you observed match or vary from the principles described in this module, and why.To complete this assignment, first watch all of the videos in the playlist below.Infants:Reading an Infant's ExpressionsStretching the Infant's ReachTwo-year-olds:Owens Falls AgainFather Gives Son Swimming LessonBen Shoots PoolThree-year-olds:Video Documentation for ParentsFour-year-olds:Helping with HomeworkMilena Builds a Story with Her MomFive-year-olds:Sink or Float ExplainedMixed ages:Discussion Starters-a CD (Choose 4 of the 8 to view)Next, answer the following questions, In your written responses, be sure to use complete sentences as well as proper punctuation and grammar.Reflect on this module's key area of practice. Share specific examples of what this looked like in the videos.Share an example of how you plan to use this key area of practice in your work with young children and families.Briefly share one "a-ha"moment or a key take away from the videos.Download the template containing these questions below.

****This discussion board question has two Parts to answerPart IThe information that you will need for the discussion can be found in Case 13d, p. 49; Case 20, p. 121; and Case 15, p. 96 of Thinking Critically About Ethical Issues. For one of these cases, identify the parties and the moral issue(s) at stake, keeping an eye out for similarities that it shares with the other cases. Concentrate on identifying which universal moral duties are at stake; also assess how the principle of respect for persons applies to the cases.Case 13d. An airline pilot goes for his medical checkup. The doctor discovers that he has developed a heart murmur. The pilot has only a month to go before he is eligible for retirement. The doctor knows this and wonders whether, under these unusual circumstances, she is justifies in withholding the information about the pilot's condition.Case 20.When Sally's father was gravely ill, he called her to his bedside and said,"I'd always hoped i'd see you graduate from college and go on to become a physicist, but I know death is near. Promise me one thing, that you'll keep on studying hard and become a physicist." Sally was deeply moved. "I will, she responded; "I swear to you I will." Her father died shortly thereafter. Now it is two years later, and Sally is ready to graduate from college. But she will not become a physicist. She has decided to go to law school.Case 15. A woman learns that her son-in-law fathered an illegitimate child several years before he met her daughter. (He and his wife have been happily married for ten years. They are childless) She is sure her daughter is not awate of this and has reason to doubt that she would ever find out about it by herself. The woman feel obliged to tell her, however, and does so. Part IIIn this week's module, we saw that Kant took the notion of a will that is not subjected to a chain of predetermining causes as the lynchpin of his moral system. Kant recognized that it is because we happen to be to some extent free to choose our courses of action that it makes any sense at all to speak of praising or blaming us for those actions. However, we also saw that Kant admitted there to be a faculty of choice by which our desires and beliefs—the things that we experience ourselves as having and that are caused by prior events—shape and cause the decisions we make. What this means therefore is that, according to Kant, human choice is problematic because it is capable of being viewed from two separate and seemingly incompatible perspectives, simultaneously:1. As part of a chain of causes and so, being determined by it. (a thesis in metaphysics known as Determinism)2. As standing outside a chain of causes (a metaphysical thesis known as the Free Will thesis)Provide a description of human choice that can be seen to exemplify both of the above perspectives. (Note you may either choose to describe a different human choice or action for each of the two perspectives, or describe the same choice from the standpoint of both perspectives at once). Do you think it is possible, as Kant did, to view human choice and action as being both free and caused, or was Kant mistaken, and are these positions mutually exclusive?Textbook used: Ethical Choices 2nd Edition (Richard Burnor & Yvonne Raley)