Alabama a & M University Effects of Performance Enhancing Substances on Athletes Paper

User Generated

Ec3obff

Business Finance

Alabama A & M University

Description

Topic : – The effects of performance enhancing substances on Athletes vs Natural performance enhancing methods on athletes

Rubric attached, guidelines are clear. APA format, sources must be from scholarly sources, no websites or untrusted sources

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Scholarly Ethical Issue Final Paper Guidelines Topic : – The effects of performance enhancing substances on Athletes vs Natural performance enhancing methods on athletes Why – I am interested in this topic because I am a sports enthusiast and I am also a youth soccer coach. Personally, I have seen some athletes first hand go down the route of using substances to enhance performance and I want to be able to keep the youth safe from that and educate them Questions to consider answering – How many athletes actually use performance enhancing substances and what are the long term negative effects on ones body when using any unnatural substances General Instruction: Based on your topic area of choice, you will select a total of 3-5 scholarly journal articles that relate to a philosophical/ethical dimension in sport. In your paper, briefly summarize each article (300 words each). Following these summaries, you will write TWO page critical analysis of the ideas presented in the journal articles as it relates to what you learned in class. It will be useful in this assignment to concentrate your articles within an area of interest to you. This paper is to be no less than FOUR pages in final length format, double spaced, with a cover page AND APA format reference page (title and reference pages are not included in the four total pages). I have provided an outline for APA format in the document titled “Final Scholarly Paper_APA Format Outline” Part 1: Article Summaries In approximately 300 words, you will summarize each article you selected while referencing the authors in APA format. These scholarly articles must be from appropriate peer reviewed journals (e.g., Journal of the Philosophy of Sport; Journal of Sport and Social Issues). Articles from a website (e.g., ESPN), videos, PowerPoint slides, or news article are NOT credible sources for the purpose of this paper. Summaries should include purpose, important literature from their review, methods (when applicable), results (when applicable), discussion, critical analyses, limitations, and conclusions. When applicable as described in parentheses above refers to research studies that have been conducted, otherwise you may find other scholarly reviews or critical analyses from the peer reviewed journal. Part 2: Critical Analysis In a minimum of TWO pages, you will critically reflect on the outlined scholarly articles above using APA in-text citations to support your purpose of the paper. What is the purpose of your paper? Why are the scholarly references important relative to the purpose of your paper? Use in text citations from the scholarly references to support your purpose and reasoning for including the work cited. Provide an ethical and/or moral assessment of the topic(s) you selected relative to the purpose of your paper. Part 3: Reflection on Personal Interests and/or Experience In a paragraph or two, consider the content/ topic selected and reflect on your own interest and/ or experiences. Why did you select this topic? What is the meaning for selecting this topic? Provide a conclusion to the scholarly paper. Assignment Rubric Criteria Article Summaries (3 pt. total) Critical Analysis (3 pt. total) Reflections on Interests and Experiences (2 pt. total) Outstanding Competent Unsatisfactory Clearly outlines purpose, important literature from their review, methods (when applicable), results (when applicable), discussion, critical analyses, limitations, and conclusions of 3-5 articles. Clearly describes the purpose of the paper and synthesizes articles in meaningful ways relative to the purpose. Critically analyzes the articles grounded in ethical and/or moral perspectives. Critiques at least three considerations, concerns, or issues regarding ethics or morality. Minimally describes each article and/or summary is missing 3 or more of the components listed to the left. Does not provided information and/or is missing a considerable amount of information for each article summary. Describes the purpose but lacks sufficient or appropriate critical analysis and meaningful synthesis. Critically analyzes the articles grounded in ethical and/or moral perspectives. Critiques less than three considerations, concerns, or issues regarding ethics or morality. Reflections are vague, unclear, and/or does not make meaningful connections. Does not provide appropriate critical analysis, meaningful synthesis, or ground the purpose in ethical and/or moral perspectives. Reflections are thoughtfully and fully developed with clear and meaningful connections to one’s own self. Reflections are not addressed in the paper. Written Writing is clear and APA Organization and style has minor or no errors. APA format (1 pt. total) Use of Credible Sources (1 pt. total) Uses 3-5 articles from credible peer reviewed journals. Writing has stylistic, grammatical, or organizational issues OR there are significant errors in APA usage. Cites some credible sources but includes other non-credible sources. Writing has significant stylistic, grammatical, or organizational issues AND there are significant errors in APA usage. Does not use credible sources or has less than 3 sources. *Note. These points add up to the total point value of the assignment (i.e., 10 points).
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.Hello,These are the articles used for the assignment.

The Effects of Performance Enhancing Substances on Athletes vs. Natural Performance
Enhancing Methods on Athletes
Part 1: Article Summaries (900 Words)
Smith, A. C., & Stavros, C. (2020). Exploring the progressive use of performance enhancing
substances by high-performance athletes. Substance use & misuse, 55(6), 914-927.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2019.1711412 (300 Words)
Loland, S. (2018). Performance-enhancing drugs, sport, and the ideal of natural athletic
performance. The American journal of bioethics, 18(6), 8-15.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2020.1761868 (300 Words)
Russell, J. S., & Browne, A. (2018). Performance-enhancing drugs as a collective action
problem. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 45(2), 109-127.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2018.1440355 (300 Words)
Part 2: Critical Analysis (600 Words)

Part 3: Reflection on Personal Interests and/or Experience (300 Words)

View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.Hello, Part 1 is complete as attached.Parts 2 and 3 are underway and will be ready before the agreed deadline.

1

The Effects of Performance Enhancing Substances on Athletes vs. Natural Performance
Enhancing Methods on Athletes

Student Name
University
Course
Professor Name
Date

2
The Effects of Performance Enhancing Substances on Athletes vs. Natural Performance
Enhancing Methods on Athletes
Part 1: Article Summaries
Smith, A. C., & Stavros, C. (2020). Exploring the progressive use of performance enhancing
substances by high-performance athletes. Substance use & misuse, 55(6), 914-927.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2019.1711412
The purpose of this article is to understand factors that compel athletes to accelerate their use
of performance enhancing substances. The authors acknowledge the significant of PES to
professional athletes (Smith & Stavros, 2020). Many take the drugs in different qualitative and at
different times. This article has been objective in understanding the reasons for accelerated use of
PES evidenced in modern-day sport.
This article provides useful information for understanding social and psychological
dynamics attributed to maximized performance. The authors have been specific in identifying
essential variables for data gathering and information analysis. For instance, the literature distances
itself away from drugs banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency WADA established in 1999
(Smith & Stavros, 2020). This is critical in ensuring credibility and legality of the content acquired
from the literature. Additionally, literature from this article is vital for understanding varying
performances among athletes. The main methods used in acquiring data presented in the article
includes macro life course-based approach. This framework entails special narratives from retired
athletes with previous experience on PES (Smith & Stavros, 2020). Data gathered from identified
participants is deemed relevant, practical, and consistent with modern-day use of performance
enhancing substances. This method integrates a thematically coded analysis to present ultimate
findings for analysis.
Ideally, the results of the article note that athletes escalate their use of PES. For instance,
some athletes engage in the practice to meet specific records implying greater success than rivals
(Smith & Stavros, 2020). Others use performance enhancing substances to increase the urgency of
maximizing one’s athletic capabilities. This article will be useful for understanding why athletes
escalate PES practice as narrated by the participants. This will be crucial in understanding which
product is common during this period (Smith & Stavros, 2020). Most essentially, the information
will be key in providing ethical sporting guidelines to upcoming soccer professionals regarding
natural performance enhancing methods.

3
Loland, S. (2018). Performance-enhancing drugs, sport, and the ideal of natural athletic
performance. The American journal of bioethics, 18(6), 8-15.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2020.1761868
The main purpose of this article is to evaluate the justifications put forwards for performance
enhancing drugs (PED). In essence, this is a particular category of PES banned by WADA (Loland,
2018). This purpose entails the understanding of doping with reference to fairness in sports and
bodily caused by the drugs. This literature will be important for understanding how PES products
are restricted in global competition (Loland, 2018). Drugs that enhance or maximize an athlete’s
performance can results in serious medical effects among athletes engaging in the practice. PEDs are
fundamental in optimizing physiological capabilities that ensure consistent success among
professional athletes. This results in increase collection of medals acquired at the expense of genuine
athletes representing their countries.
The article generally applies a qualitative method of understanding natural versus artificial
performance enhancing behavior (Loland, 2018). In essence, the approach gathers useful
information that combines biological knowledge as referenced in sports rules and guidelines. For
instance, the article strives to understand how anti-doping regulations relate with fairness in athletics
as some sportspeople get away using PEDs. These substances record significant performance
decrease when athletes cease engaging in the practice. Results from the article acknowledges that
artificial PES are critical to one’s health. In addition, the author has been useful in presenting critical
social factors which should be used for determining PEDs. For instance, the article integrates a
moral perspective of making the choice on which substance abuse athletes should be permitted to
(Loland, 2018). In essence, this would result in an unfair sport which demoralizes established global
sports.
In conclusion, the author has been objective in understanding factors that determine PED. As
acknowledged before, PES contains products which are prohibited and athletes found of breaching
WADA rules can be banned (Loland, 2018). The article is limited in its applicability and improving
fairness in sports.

Russell, J. S., & Browne, A. (2018). Performance-enhancing drugs as a collective action
problem. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 45(2), 109-127.
https://doi.org/10.1...


Anonymous
Great! 10/10 would recommend using Studypool to help you study.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags