Description
Topic : – The effects of performance enhancing substances on Athletes vs Natural performance enhancing methods on athletes
Rubric attached, guidelines are clear. APA format, sources must be from scholarly sources, no websites or untrusted sources
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.Hello,These are the articles used for the assignment.
The Effects of Performance Enhancing Substances on Athletes vs. Natural Performance
Enhancing Methods on Athletes
Part 1: Article Summaries (900 Words)
Smith, A. C., & Stavros, C. (2020). Exploring the progressive use of performance enhancing
substances by high-performance athletes. Substance use & misuse, 55(6), 914-927.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2019.1711412 (300 Words)
Loland, S. (2018). Performance-enhancing drugs, sport, and the ideal of natural athletic
performance. The American journal of bioethics, 18(6), 8-15.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2020.1761868 (300 Words)
Russell, J. S., & Browne, A. (2018). Performance-enhancing drugs as a collective action
problem. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 45(2), 109-127.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2018.1440355 (300 Words)
Part 2: Critical Analysis (600 Words)
Part 3: Reflection on Personal Interests and/or Experience (300 Words)
View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.Hello, Part 1 is complete as attached.Parts 2 and 3 are underway and will be ready before the agreed deadline.
1
The Effects of Performance Enhancing Substances on Athletes vs. Natural Performance
Enhancing Methods on Athletes
Student Name
University
Course
Professor Name
Date
2
The Effects of Performance Enhancing Substances on Athletes vs. Natural Performance
Enhancing Methods on Athletes
Part 1: Article Summaries
Smith, A. C., & Stavros, C. (2020). Exploring the progressive use of performance enhancing
substances by high-performance athletes. Substance use & misuse, 55(6), 914-927.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2019.1711412
The purpose of this article is to understand factors that compel athletes to accelerate their use
of performance enhancing substances. The authors acknowledge the significant of PES to
professional athletes (Smith & Stavros, 2020). Many take the drugs in different qualitative and at
different times. This article has been objective in understanding the reasons for accelerated use of
PES evidenced in modern-day sport.
This article provides useful information for understanding social and psychological
dynamics attributed to maximized performance. The authors have been specific in identifying
essential variables for data gathering and information analysis. For instance, the literature distances
itself away from drugs banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency WADA established in 1999
(Smith & Stavros, 2020). This is critical in ensuring credibility and legality of the content acquired
from the literature. Additionally, literature from this article is vital for understanding varying
performances among athletes. The main methods used in acquiring data presented in the article
includes macro life course-based approach. This framework entails special narratives from retired
athletes with previous experience on PES (Smith & Stavros, 2020). Data gathered from identified
participants is deemed relevant, practical, and consistent with modern-day use of performance
enhancing substances. This method integrates a thematically coded analysis to present ultimate
findings for analysis.
Ideally, the results of the article note that athletes escalate their use of PES. For instance,
some athletes engage in the practice to meet specific records implying greater success than rivals
(Smith & Stavros, 2020). Others use performance enhancing substances to increase the urgency of
maximizing one’s athletic capabilities. This article will be useful for understanding why athletes
escalate PES practice as narrated by the participants. This will be crucial in understanding which
product is common during this period (Smith & Stavros, 2020). Most essentially, the information
will be key in providing ethical sporting guidelines to upcoming soccer professionals regarding
natural performance enhancing methods.
3
Loland, S. (2018). Performance-enhancing drugs, sport, and the ideal of natural athletic
performance. The American journal of bioethics, 18(6), 8-15.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2020.1761868
The main purpose of this article is to evaluate the justifications put forwards for performance
enhancing drugs (PED). In essence, this is a particular category of PES banned by WADA (Loland,
2018). This purpose entails the understanding of doping with reference to fairness in sports and
bodily caused by the drugs. This literature will be important for understanding how PES products
are restricted in global competition (Loland, 2018). Drugs that enhance or maximize an athlete’s
performance can results in serious medical effects among athletes engaging in the practice. PEDs are
fundamental in optimizing physiological capabilities that ensure consistent success among
professional athletes. This results in increase collection of medals acquired at the expense of genuine
athletes representing their countries.
The article generally applies a qualitative method of understanding natural versus artificial
performance enhancing behavior (Loland, 2018). In essence, the approach gathers useful
information that combines biological knowledge as referenced in sports rules and guidelines. For
instance, the article strives to understand how anti-doping regulations relate with fairness in athletics
as some sportspeople get away using PEDs. These substances record significant performance
decrease when athletes cease engaging in the practice. Results from the article acknowledges that
artificial PES are critical to one’s health. In addition, the author has been useful in presenting critical
social factors which should be used for determining PEDs. For instance, the article integrates a
moral perspective of making the choice on which substance abuse athletes should be permitted to
(Loland, 2018). In essence, this would result in an unfair sport which demoralizes established global
sports.
In conclusion, the author has been objective in understanding factors that determine PED. As
acknowledged before, PES contains products which are prohibited and athletes found of breaching
WADA rules can be banned (Loland, 2018). The article is limited in its applicability and improving
fairness in sports.
Russell, J. S., & Browne, A. (2018). Performance-enhancing drugs as a collective action
problem. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 45(2), 109-127.
https://doi.org/10.1...