Length: Power Point 6-12 Slides with 150–200 words in notes section. Must be grammatically correct and plagiarism free. Must include in-text citations and reference slide.   Respond to the following scenario with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. Be substantive and clear, and use research to reinforce your ideas.Apix is considering coffee packaging as an additional diversification to its product line. Here’s information regarding the coffee packaging project:Initial investment outlay of $40 million, consisting of $35 million for equipment and $5 million for net working capital (NWC) (plastic substrate and ink inventory); NWC recoverable in terminal yearProject and equipment life: 5 yearsSales: $27 million per year for five yearsAssume gross margin of 50% (exclusive of depreciation)Depreciation: Straight-line for tax purposesSelling, general, and administrative expenses: 10% of salesTax rate: 35%Assume a WACC of 10%.Should the coffee packaging project be accepted? Why or why not? Compute the project’s IRR and NPV.In addition, answer the following questions: Do you believe that there was sufficient financial information to make a solid decision on what to do?Was there further financial information that you required that was not provided to you?What financial figure do you believe was the determinant to your decision and why?How would you be able to apply this particular financial information to other situations?Discuss risk methodologies used in capital budgeting.========================================================================Note: For this assignment, you must calculate the IRR and NPV as you did last week in your spreadsheet with new numbers. You do not need to turn in the spreadsheet, though you can include a screenshot in your PPT. In any case you must complete the calculations.The most important slides are #4 and #8. You must provide a correct NPV for the new project.You must come to the correct conclusion in slide #8.You must include speaker notes of 150 words per slide, 2-8.Use this information:Apix is considering coffee packaging as an additional diversification to its product line. Here’s information regarding the coffee packaging project:Initial investment outlay of $40 million, consisting of $35 million for equipment and $5 million for net working capital (NWC) (plastic substrate and ink inventory); NWC recoverable in terminal yearProject and equipment life: 5 yearsSales: $27 million per year for five yearsAssume gross margin of 50% (exclusive of depreciation)Depreciation: Straight-line for tax purposesSelling, general, and administrative expenses: 10% of salesTax rate: 35%Assume a WACC of 10%.Compute the project’s IRR and NPV.In addition, answer the following questions:Do you believe that there was sufficient financial information to make a solid decision on what to do?Was there further financial information that you required that was not provided to you?What financial figure do you believe was the determinant to your decision and why?How would you be able to apply this particular financial information to other situations?Discuss risk methodologies used in capital budgeting.Organize your PPT as below:PowerPoint, 9 slides.|  Slide 1: Titles. 5/5 |  Slide 2: Overview of Apix. Summary of company's assets, total profit, cash flow from operating activities, cash flow from investing and financing. 10/10|  Slide 3: Summary of last week’s expansion project. Provide previous spreadsheet results. Disuss them. 10/10 |  Slide 4: Provide your new NPV and IRR calculations and results for the coffee packaging project. Discuss what has changed. 50/50 |  Slide 5: Do you believe that there was sufficient financial information to make a solid decision on what to do? Was there further financial information that you required that was not provided to you? What financial figure do you believe was the determinant to your decision and why? 10/10 |  Slide 6: How would you be able to apply this particular financial information to other situations? Discuss risk methodologies that are used in evaluating capital budgeting. 10/10 |  Slide 7: What is the biggest risk for the company, and what can be done to minimize the risk? 10/10 |  Slide 8: Summary: Make a recommendation. Should the coffee packaging project be accepted as an additional diversification to its product line? Why or why not? 50/50 | Slide 9: References. 5/5|  Speaker Notes of 150 words per slide. 40/40  

Case 9-1. Just One Little SlipCharlene Fisher is a market analyst for the Top Cat Apparel Company, a women’s boutique clothing store with shops in several southwestern states. She joined the company in early 2007 at the corporate office located in Memphis, Tennessee. Charlene previously lived in Richmond, Virginia and worked as a market analyst for a major retailer for 5 years. She was looking for a better job when she found Top Cat's advertisement for a market analyst. After a telephone interview with Alan Jordan, Top Cat’s human resources manager, she was invited to interview with Ron McCoy, the vice president, in Memphis. At the end of the interview, Mr. McCoy offered her the position and said that she would later receive written confirmation of the offer's terms. Within a week, Charlene received a letter of confirmation from Vice President McCoy, detailing the terms of compensation and stating that she would be offered an employment contract from year to year as long as her work performance was satisfactory. She also received a booklet containing the company’s benefit plans as well as a copy of the employee handbook for all new employees. Charlene accepted the offer and moved to Memphis from Richmond, though the moving expenses cost her considerably.As a market analyst at Top Cat, Charlene’s primary function was to anticipate fashion trends and provide the shop managers with purchase recommendations about the type, brand, and quantity of clothing they should have in their store inventories. Her performance was annually rated as being very good during the first 3 years of her employment with the company and therefore her contract was extended each year with a salary increase. Charlene recently made a costly forecasting error by recommending the purchase of a large number of coats that didn’t sell very well in most stores. Tom Long, her manager, informed Charlene that the top management folks were very unhappy with her decision to recommend the coat purchase and the company has decided not to renew her contract.Charlene asked for a meeting with Mr. Long and Human Resources Manager, Alan Jordan, to appeal the company’s decision not to renew her employment contract, which she considers the same as a discharge for poor work performance. She claims that her job performance should not be based upon one mistake since her performance evaluations have been consistently very good. Charlene feels that since this one error is not a typical example of her work performance throughout her employment with the company, her termination is too severe. She believes that she should have an opportunity to show that she learned from this mistake and that a similar incident will not likely occur again. Charlene points out a statement in the company’s employee handbook that asserts employees will only be discharged for just or sufficient cause. Charlene feels that some lesser form of discipline should be considered in her case. Mr. Jordan informs her that the decision has already been made by upper management and they are not willing to reconsider this decision. He explains that Top Cat Apparel Company is an at-will employer andher employment can be terminated for any reason as long as the decision is not based upon some discriminatory or illegal grounds. Charlene decides to sue the company for wrongful discharge and breach of contract.Assignment Questions1. Does Charlene have a good argument that she is a contractual employee and that the company has a relationship with her that is controlled by either express or implied terms? Explain your answer.2. What reasons would you expect the employer to claim in defense of their action? Thoroughly explain your answer.3. What are the factors or questions that should be considered in order to determine if Charlene Fisher was afforded due process by the company in their decision to not continue her employment?