Assigned Readings:Chapter 17. Employee Stakeholders and Workplace IssuesChapter 18. Employee Stakeholders: Privacy, Safety, and HealthChapter 19. Employment Discrimination and Workplace DiversityInitial Postings: Read and reflect on the assigned readings for the week. Then post what you thought was the most important concept(s), method(s), term(s), and/or any other thing that you felt was worthy of your understanding in each assigned textbook chapter.Your initial post should be based upon the assigned reading for the week, so the textbook should be a source listed in your reference section and cited within the body of the text. Other sources are not required but feel free to use them if they aid in your discussion.Also, provide a graduate-level response to each of the following questions:Research and describe how U.S. companies have employed the doctrine of employment-at-will during the global economic recession. Evaluate how this response compared to non-U.S. companies’ treatment of labor during the recession and how different responses to labor have impacted the U.S. and global economy. Finally, address in your written response how flexible labor policies affect the U.S.’s ability cope with a recession.Visit the Newsroom at www.eeoc.gov. Review a recent press release which involves a harassment and / or discrimination claim. You should summarize the facts of the case, including the parties involved and the issues at hand. You also should note any federal laws which apply to the situation and what the outcome is / will be / should be based on the application of such laws to the case. Finally, using what you learn from the case, provide suggestions to management on how to handle a similar case in the future. [Your post must be substantive and demonstrate insight gained from the course material. Postings must be in the student's own words - do not provide quotes!] [Your initial post should be at least 450+ words and in APA format (including Times New Roman with font size 12 and double spaced). Post the actual body of your paper in the discussion thread then attach a Word version of the paper for APA review]Submitting the Initial Posting:Your initial posting should be completed by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. EST. Response to Other Student Postings: Respond substantively to the post of at least two peers, by Friday, 11:59 p.m. EST. A peer response such as “I agree with her,” or “I liked what he said about that” or similar comments are not considered substantive and will not be counted for course credit.[Continue the discussion through Sunday,11:59 p.m. EST by highlighting differences between your postings and your colleagues' postings. Provide additional insights or alternative perspectives]Evaluation of posts and responses: Your initial posts and peer responses will be evaluated on the basis of the kind of critical thinking and engagement displayed. The grading rubric evaluates the content based on seven areas:Content Knowledge & Structure, Critical Thinking, Clarity & Effective Communication, Integration of Knowledge & Articles, Presentation, Writing Mechanics, and Response to Other Students

case study you will respond to a series of questions for that specific case study using the Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification Code of Ethics, Ethics from The American Counseling Association your text and your own insight, present the following about a case in the form of a reaction paper. • Identify the major issues from the case. Accurate interpretation of the facts of the case is required. • Apply standards and concepts from assigned readings to the case • Explain how this case is relevant to your work as a counseling professional? The paper must be APA format using proper grammar and spelling. Double check your work to make sure it is free from errors. Case Study BOBBob is a licensed clinical counselor who has operated a small group practice in a suburban office building for twenty years. He is well recognized for his expertise in working with clients with complex problems who require long term counseling. One day he receives a telephone call from another counselor (Ted) working in the same neighborhood. Bob does not know Ted. Ted tells Bob that he is currently in the office with a woman named Nancy who has come to see him to discuss her depression. Ted proceeds to tell Bob that Nancy has just accused him of sexual misconduct and that Ted wants him to explain what happened when Nancy came to see Bob. Ted tells Bob that nothing he can say will dissuade him from reporting Bob to the licensing board but that he still wants to hear what he has to say. Ted goes on to tell Bob that his actions have been totally unprofessional and that he has traumatized this woman. Bob is shocked and first tries to ascertain that this is not a crank call and to clarify that Ted is indeed a licensed professional. The information Ted shares clarifies that he is a licensed clinical social worker and that he has Nancy's permission to make this phone call. As he listens to Ted describe Nancy and the comments she has made to Ted, Bob realizes that he does not even recognize the woman to whom Ted is referring. Bob asks Nancy to describe his physical appearance, but her description could fit many men and is not very helpful. Next Bob asks if Nancy would be willing to speak with him on the phone because he still has no memory of seeing Nancy. As soon as they begin the conversation Nancy realizes that she does not recognize Bob's voice. After a few more exchanges Nancy comes to seriously doubt whether she has identified the right counselor. Ted mumbles a few words about getting more information and calling back later and hangs up. Bob is so upset by this conversation that he cannot sleep that night and immediately consults with a colleague. Bob then tries to figure out how to follow up with Ted who falsely accused him of a serious violation. (Bob later learns that Nancy had seen another counselor in a nearby building with the first name of Robert). Bob comes to you for consultation. How would you advise him regarding his interaction with Ted and what about Nancy and his knowledge about the other counselor? Use a CODE of Ethics to support your response. Respond to the following questions for this case study: Is there an ethical issue in the case?Summarize what the ethical issues is.If so, did the professional act in a manner consistent with current standards and principles? CRC Code of Ethics and Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice of the American Counseling Association (2014)Identify the CODES from the CRC / ACAIf not, what other courses of action would be more ethical?Identify what model you used to come to your decision and what is the basis for that judgment?Resolution: Which of those potentially ethical responses is most consistent with the ethical ideals of the profession?Resolution: What competing values may interfere with the professional implementing the ethical decision? How can colleagues and supervisors help the professional to act ethically?If the professional fails to act responsibly and his or her misconduct is reported to a disciplinary body, what kind of action should that body take in this kind of case?Summarize your findings.This paper does not have to be a certain length. Just please include all of the info. I normally have a page and a half for my case studies.Here is the length to the Code of Ethics. Please include the code when answering the questions. https://www.counseling.org/resources/aca-code-of-ethics.pdf