information system design

Question Description

Answer the following questions (please copy the question’s text before each of your answers) and submit them to your professor for grading. 

1. Assume that at Pine Valley Furniture products are composed of components, products are assigned to salespersons, and components are produced by vendors. Also assume that in the relation PRODUCT (Prodname, Salesperson, Compname, Vendor), Vendor is functionally dependent on Compname and Compname is functionally dependent on Prodname. Eliminate the transitive dependency in this relation and form 3NF (third normal form) relations.

2. Transform the E-R diagram of Figure 8-3 into a set of 3NF relations. Make up a primary key and one or more non-keys for each entity.

3. Transform the E-R diagram of Figure 9-21 into a set of 3NF relations.

4. Consider the list of individual 3NF relations below. These relations were developed from several separate normalization activities.

PATIENT(Patient_ID, Room_Number, Admit_Date, Address)

ROOM(Room_Number, Phone, Daily_Rate)

PATIENT(Patient_Number, Treatment_Description, Address)

TREATMENT(Treatment_ID, Description, Cost)

PHYSICIAN(Physician_ID, Name, Department)

PHYSICIAN(Physician_ID, Name, Supervisor_ID)

(a) Merge these relations into a consolidated set of 3NF relations. State whatever assumptions you consider necessary to resolve any potential problems you identify in the merging process. (b) Draw an E-R diagram for your answer to part “a”.

5. Consider the following 3NF relations about a sorority or fraternity:

MEMBER(Member_ID, Name, Address, Dues_Owed)

OFFICE(Office_Name, Officer_ID, Term_Start_Date, Budget)

EXPENSE(Ledger_Number, Office_Name, Expense_Date, Amt_Owed)

PAYMENT(Check_Number, Expense_Ledger_Number, Amt_Paid)

RECEIPT(Member_ID, Receipt_Date, Dues_Received)

COMMITTEE(Committee_ID, Officer_in_Charge)

WORKERS(Committee_ID, Member_ID)

(a) Foreign keys are not indicated in these relations. Decide which attributes are foreign keys and justify your decisions. (b) Draw an E-R diagram for these relations, using your answer to part “a”. (c) Explain the assumptions you made about cardinalities in your answer to part “b”. Explain why it is said that the E-R data model is more expressive or more semantically rich than the relational data model.

6. Consider the following functional dependencies:

Applicant_ID --> Applicant_Name

Applicant_ID --> Applicant_Address

Position_ID --> Position_Title

Position_ID --> Date_Position_Opens

Position_ID --> Department

Applicant_ID + Position_ID --> Date_Applied

Applicant_ID + Position_ID + Date_Interviewed --> (Nothing)

(a) Represent these attributes with 3NF relations. Provide meaningful relation names. (b) Represent these attributes using an E-R diagram. Provide meaningful entity and relationship names.

7. Suppose you were designing a file of student records for your university’s placement office. One of the fields that would likely be in this file is the student’s major. Develop a coding scheme for this field that achieves the objectives outlined in Chapter 10 for field coding.

8. Suppose you created a file for each relation in your answer to question “3” above. If the following queries represented the complete set of accesses to this database, suggest and justify what primary and secondary key indices you would build.

(a) For each PART in Item_Number order list in Vendor_ID, sequence all the vendors and their associated prices for that part. (b) List all PART RECEIPTs, including related PART fields for all the parts received on a particular day. (c) For a particular VENDOR, list all the PARTs and their associated prices that VENDOR can supply.

Final Answer

Duke University

Return customer, been using sp for a good two years now.

Thanks as always for the good work!

Excellent job


Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors